It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
She will never be indicted. Royalty is above the law.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: AboveBoard
If Ms. Clinton is guilty of such an egregious crime, and he sat on the information while the FBI were looking into it in the hopes that he could screw with our elections...that's ok hunky dory because its Hillary? Cart her off to jail, I DON'T CARE. Screw with elections, and I care.
It does not excuse Assange but it also does not excuse Clinton if she did something illegal.
originally posted by: SudoNim
a reply to: Tempter
How could you possibly know what I'd wish? Stop trying to justify someone wishing terminal cancer on another human being.
I wouldn't wish that on anyone. This lack of morality seems to be a common trait among Trump supporters.
Anyone else see "trouble" coming his way very soon? Suicide, stroke, or heart attack. Let's place our bets.
the trouble i see coming for him, relates to his now obvious ties with russia, he has to answer those first, any impartiality is being shot to pieces, daily, he now comes across as a propagandist solely for the republican party.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: thepixelpusher
He sure used a lot of words to say nothing. Thousands of pages... why not just release them all? Oh, wait, he only wants to publish things that make the Clinton campaign look bad. Incidentally, he does make it clear that these documents are from the DNC, not the State Department. The FSB won't release those out of force of habit.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: AboveBoard
Assange would reply they are just leveling the playing field because one side is playing dirty and he's just revealing the truth. By their own words they are defeating themselves.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: thepixelpusher
He sure used a lot of words to say nothing. Thousands of pages... why not just release them all? Oh, wait, he only wants to publish things that make the Clinton campaign look bad. Incidentally, he does make it clear that these documents are from the DNC, not the State Department. The FSB won't release those out of force of habit.
Agreed. This is quite a show.
(How do we know that anything he releases is "pure?" How do we know it hasn't been altered? This is a real question. Perhaps there are forensics that can be done?)
He is absolutely interfering with the election, and the people that don't care here are blinded to it because it serves their own bias. I wish they would forget that it's about Hillary, put it into a neutral narrative and see that our election process is being interfered with not just by this weasel of a man, but by those who pull his strings.
People say "the ends justify the means" while failing to see that the "means" are a psyop and attack on our country. If she is NEVER "arrested" people here will believe fervently (because bias) that she DESERVED to be, even if there is NO REAL EVIDENCE.
The real goal may be to delegitimize a Clinton Presidency. We should think about that, because it is an attack on our Democracy, and an attempt to fan the flames of discontent that are already burning, and to sow disruption and further deadlock. Putin wins the new cold war.
originally posted by: carewemust
Assange also says that according to U.S. election laws, Bernie Sanders will replace Hillary on the November 8th ballot.