It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by drbryankkruta
Originally posted by Seekerof
as posted by drbryankkruta
NOW NOTE Condi should stand up for herself I am not saying she was wrong for telling the senator not to attack her characture by saying she is a liar, but it could have been done in better form.
Say what?
Your saying that Ms. Rice should have handled it better, all the while you condone the behavior of Senator Boxer?! Oh my....
Biased?
Here's how I saw it:
Absolutely not Boxer was way out of line , but she is not the one being intrusted with a position that on a daily baises Condi's behavior could be construed as an insult and result in political and peace difficulties, she needs more self control in such a sensitive position.
as posted by Kidfinger
Did you learn a new word in class? There is nothing'moot' about my point. She lied and senator Boxer pointed it out. I guess Condi should be unaccountable for her actions. OH, THATS RIGHT! Bush already said no one in his administration is going to be held accountable for ANYTHING having to do with the Iraq war......
Originally posted by Seekerof
First of all, Senator Boxer lost her semi-right to a "rebuttal" when she insinuated that Ms. Rice was a "liar".
Don't think so?
Next time you get the opportunity to formally question an individual, insinuate or call them a "liar" and see how much of an opportunity that you get for a "rebuttal," k?
seekerof
[edit on 19-1-2005 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Seekerof
as posted by Kidfinger
Did you learn a new word in class? There is nothing'moot' about my point. She lied and senator Boxer pointed it out. I guess Condi should be unaccountable for her actions. OH, THATS RIGHT! Bush already said no one in his administration is going to be held accountable for ANYTHING having to do with the Iraq war......
Proved that "lie" yet, Kidfinger?
Here, try this first:
We Bust Buffoon Babs Boxer on Her Blatant Iraq Lie
seekerof
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Too long the "position" has been dominated by "doves". Diplomacy does not work, ever. The action should be change or die......Peace through strength.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
She is a liar. I would have done worse had I been Boxer.
No matter how you put it, they all lied. And i find it insulting to my intelligence when they play semantics with the truth, which is why I basically ignore every offical statement, except as a refrence point, from any of the DC crowd.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Seekerof,
I did not attack your intelligence. And you did not prove me wrong.
Originally posted by soficrow
You go kidfinger!
...When our leaders act without morals OR manners - how can we even pretend either is important? And how can we raise our children to be good people?
Originally posted by marg6043
People get it, she will be appointed liar or not liar, poor public and international manners or not, she cares not, she has done well for the Bush Klan and she is for the pay off of the position.
She was appointed to her new position so she can do what the administration wants, and will not criticized like Mr. Power dared to do, and I do respect Mr. Power for that.
Miss Rice will be the "all" Mr. Bush may wish for.
Originally posted by drbryankkruta
yes but she is going to be their down fall mark my words if she stands up in a meeting with a sheik from a country where women have no rights, and does this to him , the war is afoot myfriend, Tact is a paramount concern in her position whether she is a yes man or not.
Originally posted by drbryankkruta
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Too long the "position" has been dominated by "doves". Diplomacy does not work, ever. The action should be change or die......Peace through strength.
Doc H
as I told you in another thread while I respect you as a friend your hardlined kill them all view is more harmful than good, geonocide or homicide to reach one goal only invites the same to come about on you yourself . Surely the vanity of violence has not totally escaped you my friend.
Originally posted by mwm1331
Bout time,
off topic remark comming
In reference to your new sig line -
While I have not heard of or verified the study mentioned one reason it may be seen as a vndicaton of the gop s that university professors are notorious for having great amounts of theoretical knowledge and less than a thimble full of practical knowledge. Think back to your college professors and ask yourself this.
How many of them have ever been anything more than professional students prior to becomming professors? How many have or could make it in the real world?
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by drbryankkruta
yes but she is going to be their down fall mark my words if she stands up in a meeting with a sheik from a country where women have no rights, and does this to him , the war is afoot myfriend, Tact is a paramount concern in her position whether she is a yes man or not.
Yes I agree with you her "vision for a better world" will include US domination and wars in the middle east.
That is why she is in the right position, but, she also has bigger plans for herself in the future, and what she doesn't know is that all this is going to come back to hunt her.
It was a time when I used to admired her tenacity and standing, and I read her biography and her dreams as she talked about it, but if Bush wag another war, in the middle east she being in Power position will hurt her future.
Some times the desire for power will make the most bright person blind.
[edit on 19-1-2005 by marg6043]