It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DNC Committee Rejects Amendments to Eliminate Superdelegates After Locking Sanders Delegates Out of the Room
DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz also appointed 25 members of the Rules Committee who are able to vote on each proposal.
The meeting of 187 rules committee members took place inside a small room at Philadelphia’s Wells Fargo Center that was apparently at capacity from the start, meaning that even leading national political reporters like the Washington Post’s David Weigel couldn’t get in.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Gumerk
At least they had enough votes to have a floor vote though!
originally posted by: Gumerk
Sanders delegates are locked out of the room at the convention? Jeez
Amendment to eliminate Superdelegates
DNC Committee Rejects Amendments to Eliminate Superdelegates After Locking Sanders Delegates Out of the Room
DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz also appointed 25 members of the Rules Committee who are able to vote on each proposal.
DNC kicks out most reporters at start of rules committee; they had not previously said that any part would be closed press.— daveweigel (@daveweigel) July 23, 2016
DNC rules committee has now voted:- NO to eliminating superdelegates- NO to reducing their power by 90%Bad start, #DNC. See you Monday.— Democracy Spring (@DemSpring) July 23, 2016
Why are they being forcibly removed?
BREAKING: Our outside group has been forcibly removed from the DNC! Registered and had delegates #DemsInPhilly pic.twitter.com/Tbwvp0JAn3— People For Bernie (@People4Bernie) July 23, 2016
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: mOjOm
There wasn't a criminal intention behind it.
That's my only guess. And I am not even joking
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Gumerk
I don't get it. Isn't it a crime or something to tamper with elections???
How is this allowed exactly???
Although I guess they locked Ron Paul out of the debates too so maybe nothing is illegal in politics anymore.
We should just give them all swords and put them in a room together and whoever makes it out alive wins.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: mOjOm
Hey, I agree with you, but the FBI director wouldn't.
Wasserman was simply extremely careless...
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: mOjOm
There wasn't a criminal intention behind it.
That's my only guess. And I am not even joking
Shouldn't locking delegates out of a vote be illegal though??
If so then there is criminal intent isn't there??
The intent to falsify a vote by locking out certain members from their lawful right to cast their vote???