Democrats controlling news media

a reply to: BlueAjah

These leaks are huge. I am sure a lot of you constantly see my comments talking about the social engineering going on. The media is a controlled propaganda piece, and as time goes on more and more information will come out proving that it is one big mind control show.

If you have opinions that line up with the mainstream narrative, stop for a minute and think. Are these opinions your own, or have you been influenced by the msm platforms?

This influence is so powerful that it sways the minds and opinions of everyone in the world. This leak is extremely important, because those of us that do not buy into it understand what Hillary is. She would not be in this position at all without the use of propaganda techniques at a very high level.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are the victim of social engineering.

originally posted by: Winstonian


If you support Hillary Clinton, you are the victim of social engineering.

I'm sure it's a technical point at best, in light of such absolutism, but what if we are simply against Mr. Trump and don't want to throw our vote away?

a reply to: Gryphon66

As usual I am sure my response to you will be skewed or misrepresented, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt yet again.

Do an experiment. Do a google search for Trump, and see how much positive information comes out of the mainstream media.

People widely dislike Trump based on the same exact type of social engineering. People LOVED Trump before he announced his presidential run. His words have been misconstrued and misused with sly editing and spin. The entire media is FOR HRC, while at the same time fervently AGAINST Trump. I would argue it is the same level of social engineering.

I dislike a lot of things that Trump has said or stands for, but they are not the same things everyone else HATES him for. I dislike some of his comments regarding libel laws. I dislike some of his over the top comments on handling terror.

Most people hate Trump because they are told he is racist, sexist, etc. etc., which is very clearly not the case. This is the result of social engineering. They did the exact same thing to Ron Paul. Ron was painted as a dangerous racist that would isolate us from the rest of the world.

If people dislike him for his policy which is very clearly and prominently displayed on his campaign page, then that is fine with me and shows people did their due diligence instead of listening to media spin and bias.

originally posted by: Winstonian
I dislike a lot of things that Trump has said or stands for, but they are not the same things everyone else HATES him for.

You can't just claim that to be true. What you're saying is that You dislike him for valid and logical reasons while everyone else dislikes him for other invalid reasons. But for one, you don't know why people dislike him. Maybe a few here and there but "Everybody"?? Also, you're claiming that your reasons are valid while others aren't but why???

I dislike him for those same reasons you do, but have some others as well that I can also support with solid evidence to show it being reasonable and not just emotions or brainwashing.

You don't get to decide what makes a valid reason to dislike him anymore than anyone else does. Also who's to say you're not just as brainwashed by media as anyone else is???

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
they both do it. faux news is an extension of the GOP

You know what?

Fox news reported way way way more about the ongoing Hillary email scandal... probably more than any other news network.

Constantly hammered for "anonymous sources close to the investigation"

Looking back with those 20/20 glasses will reveal to anyone that the VAST majority of what Fox news reported turned out to be absolutely correct.

I will no longer have nearly as much doubt about Fox News... at least they reported what the other were "influenced" or either not report or gloss over.

a reply to: mOjOm

This is such an intellectually dishonest tactic very commonly used by the left. Instead of really discussing what I am saying objectively, you rush to the "NOT ALL" excuse. Am I really ranting and raving here to the point that I look out of my mind? Do you really think that I mean EVERYONE in the literal sense?

How the heck are we supposed to have intellectual conversations on this site when people go about it in such an intellectually dishonest manner?

From now on, when I make a generalization , just pretend that I said "NOT ALL" before hand.

I would estimate that it is safe to say that the majority of people that dislike Trump believe he is racist, but #NOTALL.

Is that better?

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz steps down! The bitch is out!

www.politico.com...

originally posted by: Winstonian

And a quote from your post:

I dislike a lot of things that Trump has said or stands for, but they are not the same things everyone else HATES him for.

If you don't want me to think that's what you mean then don't say it that way.

Stop generalizing about how everything is always what the "left" does and maybe we can have an intelligent conversation. You generalize so much I don't think you realize when you're doing it.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Is this real life? Is this not illegal? Is this not an open doorway for some serious criminal investigations? And if not, why? The Democratic party is crap! Annihilate them and the two party system.

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
they both do it. faux news is an extension of the GOP

Is that supposed to be a joke??? You're comparing one single news station (FOX) being right leaning to how many that are owned by the left? ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Politico (check those emails...they are in there) and all the other smaller stations.

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
they both do it. faux news is an extension of the GOP

And while we are at it...how about some fun names for those stations as you call faux news?

ABC = All Bow to Clinton
CBS = Clinton Broadcasting Socialists
NBC = Nothing But Clinton
CNN = Clinton, Nothing Negative
Politico = I give up...but you get the point

And considering they are all bought by the liberals, maybe (or most likely) Fox is the only one telling the truth. Since they usually say the opposite and you only buy and pay a station when you want them to lie...it makes the most sense.

a reply to: mOjOm

You are right, I guess I just assumed that nuanced language skills were acceptable on ATS. I will be sure to type slowly and clearly.

Another example of violation of journalistic integrity:

WikiLeaks emails: Pro-Clinton CNN political commentator pre-checked op-ed with DNC

twitter.com...

WikiLeaks emails: Pro-Clinton CNN political commentator pre-checked op-ed with DNC

A sharp indictment of the Sanders people shouldn’t have shocked anyone familiar with Cardona, who is a committed Clintonite. CNN.com even dropped some italicized language at the top of the op-ed:

Editor’s Note: Maria Cardona, a political commentator for CNN, is a Hillary Clinton supporter and Democratic Party superdelegate. She is a principal at the Dewey Square Group, which does work for a super PAC supporting Clinton. The opinions expressed in this commentary are hers.

And, perhaps the Democratic National Committee’s. What CNN.com did not include in its disclaimer is that Cardona pre-checked a draft of the op-ed with the DNC. That revelation comes from the mass of emails released by WikiLeaks and indexed here. On the morning of May 18, Cardona sent a draft of the op-ed to the DNC under this subject line: “Subject: URGENT – DRAFT CNN OPED ON NV.” Her request was in the top line: “I want to make sure it is not to heavy handed. Please let me know asap! Thanks!!”

Sure enough, DNC spokesman Luis Miranda replied, ” It’s fine with me, but the Clinton campaign would probably ask you not to place it.” To which Cardona shot back, ” Ok, will check with them.” In an email to the Erik Wemple Blog, Cardona said she merely apprised the Clinton campaign that she was placing the op-ed. “In terms of CNN, I am not in the habit of telling folks who place my OpEds who I speak to as I am writing them. CNN hired me precisely because of my positions- past and present, my relationships and connections and my ability to talk to the right people as needed. And my opinions.” Furthermore, Cardona reports that she wanted to be “fair and balanced ” in her portrayal of events in Nevada, events about which the DNC was well-informed.

OMG..the red faces on Clinton News Network (CNN) this evening are priceless! Every anchor and reporter looks like they just pooped their pants and are trying to hide it!

Cant wait to see how the regular weekday CNN anchors, talking heads, and panel "experts" handle this. Think I might skip work tomorrow just to watch, and revel in their misery.

a reply to: BlueAjah
youtu.be...

What bothers me about as much as anything is the lack of original thought by the speech writers or the people who think they can lead a nation. Everything is scripted when they think they can get away with it.

Has anyone seen coverage of the pro Bernie anti DNC demonstrations in Philly today?

I watched videos on Facebook posted by Bernie supporters.

a reply to: Winstonian

So essentially anyone who agrees with your perspective is a free thinker and anyone who has a different opinion is a social robot.

That's a great position ... A bit megalomaniacal perhaps ... Airtight logic though as you have skewed your claims.

News flash ... Not everyone who dislikes Trump is mind controlled, socially engineered, befuddled by some NWO left wing sorcery ... Et al.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Another example of violation of journalistic integrity:

Good Find! It just confirms what we've all suspected for a very long time.

a reply to: olaru12

I knew a station producer here in Colorado,YOU are running an obstruction campaign or aren't aware (HOW you wouldn't know, I don't know or care)
THAT is why FOX is so popular and hated.

There is indeed a group of people that control everything we see, hear & read. Anybody who has ever googled the Illuminated is familiar with this. And they do indeed tend to lean left. But their identity is hidden from us with cartoony names like "The Illuminati"; They have built walls around your minds and ears so that you will never believe when they are called by their true name. Nevertheless; Here is a MINISCULE taste of they say about themselves, to themselves. STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH.

originally posted by: Joel Stein, LA Times, December 19, 2008
I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

There is a veritable flood of quotes like these.