Is You-Know-Who a Psychopath? - Here's the Actual Criteria

a reply to: BO XIAN

Very well said. I yield to the advanced degree.

Thank you for the validation. It is nice to hear once in a while.

a reply to: SentientCentenarian

Keith Olbermann hates Donald Trump and wrote a tunnel-visioned, biased, inane article to smear him? NOOOOOO!!!!!
Who could have seen that coming!?!?!?

Mind you this asshat also recently said "Donald Trump with access to nukes is more dangerous than ISIS with access to nukes." Now, if that statement from Olbermann doesn't make you realize he's the one with the screws loose and he's the one who needs the sanity test, then there's probably no point in further discussing it because you're in too deep to save.

What a fascinating article. I don't know much about Donald Trump but it certainly was a compelling read. Bias granted, he still demonstrates some concerning character traits and past behaviours.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Yeah, welll, that and $15 MIGHT get you a Mocha at Starbucks.

Mercifully, I haven't had to do toooo much with psychopaths or sociopaths close at hand in recent years . . . more borderline folks . . . which have their own flavor of . . .

"fun."

I wonder if universities had more psychopaths or sociopaths than the list of counseling clients. An interesting question.

a reply to: JimNasium

Time for a Johnson in The White House and not for someone who acts like a "Johnson" or who is married to a guy who has a problem w/His 'Johnson'...

Feel the Johnson.

a reply to: BO XIAN

Well, maybe Dunkin then...

I bet they are a special kind of fun...

What really gets me about psychopaths is how well they integrate. They learn to mimic whatever social skills they need to manipulate whoever is in their sites. It literally is like pushing buttons for them. Scary. When I was little people would say things to kids like, "Be careful - watch out for the bogey man." The problem was that the bogey man didn't wear a sign that said 'bogey man'. The real threat came from the guy who matched his surroundings on the outside, but was pure evil on the inside. These chameleons are invisible, until its too late. Even in retrospect they still are the ones people say, "He was such a nice guy, never caused any problems, always kept to himself, his yard was always so neat."

Creepy.

a reply to: SentientCentenarian


There's no missing your intent or point. You can position him as you like. (others as well.) All it indicates is Trump made strides and the fear is escalating on the left..

This is a very good indicator, IMO.

This has been a nation of 'Law and Order'. We have not suffered anything approaching your very invalid attempt
to position Trump as some fascist. The average citizen has no fear of our laws...but do fear the obvious selective application of those laws.

'Fear of fascism' versus 'fear of chaos'. I prefer those that would violate our laws and Constitution regain a sense of 'fear of consequence' of those acts.

I question anyone's intention, integrity and loyalty that would promote a fear of fascism when there is zero evidence, history or apparent intent for anything remotely resembling your obvious positioning.

a reply to: SentientCentenarian


America is screwed either way, both are psychotic, both liars, and both Progressives.

I thought if you took a selfie,that was the definition of a psychopath.

ABSOLUTELY INDEED!

That's one of the few reasons that even partially explains the brain-dead cluelessness of her supporters who otherwise probably can at least tie their shoelaces and brush their teeth somewhat regularly.

originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: BO XIAN

Well, maybe Dunkin then...

I bet they are a special kind of fun...

What really gets me about psychopaths is how well they integrate. They learn to mimic whatever social skills they need to manipulate whoever is in their sites. It literally is like pushing buttons for them. Scary. When I was little people would say things to kids like, "Be careful - watch out for the bogey man." The problem was that the bogey man didn't wear a sign that said 'bogey man'. The real threat came from the guy who matched his surroundings on the outside, but was pure evil on the inside. These chameleons are invisible, until its too late. Even in retrospect they still are the ones people say, "He was such a nice guy, never caused any problems, always kept to himself, his yard was always so neat."

Creepy.

ABSOLUTELY.

More than creepy . . . ruthless, visceral, tyrannical, murderous, genocidal raw evil running around loose scanning, searching for ways to express itself in rank evil, ruthless, bloody ways.

I'd guesstimate that were the screeching pants suit to get back in the WH, the "mysteriously dead" list would quickly rise into the thousands--NOT COUNTING the "OFFICIAL" black ops and otherwise ordered military actions.

a reply to: NOTurTypical

There have to be some hidden things on the Trump side that the oligarchy is playing very cleverly. I can't believe he is all THAT independent from them.

HOWEVER,

we have HAD a taste of what being . . . uhhhh . . . humped by the Clintons is somewhat like--though it was probably several orders of magnitude LESS back then--compared to what it would be if she were to return to the WH.

I don't think folks understand what RAW EVIL lurks within that woman. Just talk to folks who worked around her and saw it on a regular basis and are no longer literally under her evil, mind-control-demonic-SPELL.

Even if I knew that Trump was going to be seriously bad (I cannot believe he'd be 1/20th as bad as the screeching pants suit)--but just pretend that he'd likely be seriously bad. I'd still rather be raped by him than the Clintons, yet again. There are too many still bleeding sore spots from the same-ole-same-ole by the Clintons. At least I'd have some different sore & bleeding spots.

a reply to: neo96

Maybe Trump is this countries last,best,hope to restore sanity back to the asylum.

Trump is AIPAC approved, Zionist-backed, 1%er from a rich family, files bankruptcy and abuses the system, lies about his wealth, tells non-stop lies, has not a single clue how to deal with politicians, and you think he's a winner?

He reminds me of Bush. He has zero platform, decent persona and full of himself, can avoid subjects and lie or just talk nonsense for hours on end. And he's a comic's dream.

And just to remind the Republican flakes/drones/automatons on the board, Im not saying HRC is better, in fact, there is zero worthy choice, which is why people should refuse to participate. But if you actually think Trump is going to do anything but sink the country into the worst hole imaginable, or start a war, you're delusional.

The ol' "The Antichrist will be someone who people believe is the solution to the problem, the saviour in disguise..." -I never actually thought that could happen, because people are just too used to corrupt lowlives, that they couldn't possibly be swindled by another. Apparently wrong because some people actually think a guy born with a silver spoon, who's spend his life lying about having more money than he's had, trying to get "in" with the oldest money, and burning millions on gaudy, tacky, tasteless junk while he bankrupts his projects and gaslights partners....You think he's the one that will fix things?

Holy crap.

Lets not mention his best buddy involved in 9/11 either. Makes sense though. People liked Bush too.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: SentientCentenarian

NONSENSE.

The gritchy pants suit--yeah, she'd probably qualify.

. . . except for her ragaholism . . .

certainly she is a compulsive pathological liar.
certainly she is a homicidal maniac.
certainly she has not a shred of morality or compunctions about doing any number of a long list of evil deeds--then laughing, cackling about them.

certainly she is an EXTREME NARCISSIST.
certainly she is pathologically vengeful, spiteful, ruthless, greedy, power-mongering.

She's probably the most psychopathic politico on the world stage currently--by a good margin.

And that's just in view of the well publicized stuff in her own words and often in her own videos.

You would have a point if those things were true. But they are not. I think even in a venue such as this it is irresponsible to write such garbage in regard to someone's mental status. People are listening to you because of your age old Ph.d and you are doing them a disservice. And you know it. If you don't, you should.

a reply to: BO XIAN

That's one of the few reasons that even partially explains the brain-dead cluelessness of her supporters who otherwise probably can at least tie their shoelaces and brush their teeth somewhat regularly.

So can you explain to the "brain dead clueless supporters" why the Clinton's (Bill) was investigated 6 times in office, HRC was investigated for Benghazi-the longest running investigation in Congressional History, even more than JFK, 9/11-two of which have Mossad-linked connections...

Not to mention Trump is the Zionist-approved candidate, the pro-Zion magazines are telling their readership to vote for him over HRC.

Strange when he was linked in a 250 Million Tax Fraud case by someone with a direct connection to the Iaraeli-Russian Mafia & the CIA oh, and even after "blaming" Saudi Arabia for 9/11 or inferring they are partly responsible, Trump still does business there.

Now, if a global power elite is controlling the world behind the scenes... Weird how if the Clinton's are just stooges, they would end up being targeted repeatedly, volley after volley, and the same forces that seem to be attached to multiple false flags and connected to cases which are suspected but not proven, those people are not happy with the Clintons.

Also why is HRC being investigated more than anyone, when Bush was in power, John O'Neil - Counter-terror chief of NY, expert in Al-Q, chasing down Bin Laden, all over his ass, and the Blind Sheik's, Ali Mohamed, was also tracking down the Mossad-linked operation on the Cole, gets dragged out of Yemen, walks out of a 30 yr career at FBI, and given the head of security for WTC position as consolation for being pushed out. Little did he know he'd be dead in two weeks.

Not only did all that happen, but after that, Bush would go on to lie entirely, to get into a war. Which is just historical record now. But where were his congressional hearings? Ah right. Just like 9/11 it wasn't important. Just like it wasn't important Trump had business dealings with the Israeli-Russian mob/fraudster/spook.

So here's the question, why is it the "good guys" appear to be facilitating the "bad guys"? If HRC supporters are brain-dead and clueless, what does that say about Trump and Bush? The latter seem to get by pretty unscathed.

You can vote for whoever you want, but don't pretend Trump is even an iota different than HRC. If anything probably worse because he hasn't spent years building leverage on people like she has. The strings on Trump are dangling out of his pants and people are pretending he's a hero. Its bizarre.