It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Jonjonj
now we are getting Tweets to fan the flames. Can we ban tweets on ATS? We all know about Twitter ffs, we don't need links to them live until they are real and proven.
Tweets are easily photoshopped and easily verified.
My point is simply that they heat up the debate for no reason. ATS isn't that kind of place, unless it wants to be.
So, how could they know that it is an attackers car if one or two are on the run, and the dead one still under investigation???
originally posted by: Dumbass
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Jonjonj
now we are getting Tweets to fan the flames. Can we ban tweets on ATS? We all know about Twitter ffs, we don't need links to them live until they are real and proven.
Tweets are easily photoshopped and easily verified.
My point is simply that they heat up the debate for no reason. ATS isn't that kind of place, unless it wants to be.
ATS is that kind of place for a couple of years now or didn't you read that memo?
originally posted by: UKTruth
Just very wary of the biggest threat in the world - radical islamic terrorism, which this looks to be.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DerBeobachter
So, how could they know that it is an attackers car if one or two are on the run, and the dead one still under investigation???
Perhaps they have been able to identify the dead man and the car was registered in his name.
Just a thought.
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DerBeobachter
So, how could they know that it is an attackers car if one or two are on the run, and the dead one still under investigation???
Perhaps they have been able to identify the dead man and the car was registered in his name.
Just a thought.
Thought about how could they identify him, when the robot is still investigating, as it seems. But maybe he was a registered criminal.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DerBeobachter
So, how could they know that it is an attackers car if one or two are on the run, and the dead one still under investigation???
Perhaps they have been able to identify the dead man and the car was registered in his name.
Just a thought.
Thought about how could they identify him, when the robot is still investigating, as it seems. But maybe he was a registered criminal.
True. I don't know the right answer, but I was just offering options.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
Once again:
9 people dead.
3 possible attackers still on the run.
1 suspect possibly dead.
Unconfirmed amount of people injured, some critical.
Bring it back people, bring it back.
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DerBeobachter
So, how could they know that it is an attackers car if one or two are on the run, and the dead one still under investigation???
Perhaps they have been able to identify the dead man and the car was registered in his name.
Just a thought.
Thought about how could they identify him, when the robot is still investigating, as it seems. But maybe he was a registered criminal, then a pic of his face would be enough.
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DerBeobachter
So, how could they know that it is an attackers car if one or two are on the run, and the dead one still under investigation???
Perhaps they have been able to identify the dead man and the car was registered in his name.
Just a thought.
Thought about how could they identify him, when the robot is still investigating, as it seems. But maybe he was a registered criminal.
True. I don't know the right answer, but I was just offering options.
It´s nothing but speculations right now, and news stop coming in, or slowed down.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: Dumbass
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Jonjonj
now we are getting Tweets to fan the flames. Can we ban tweets on ATS? We all know about Twitter ffs, we don't need links to them live until they are real and proven.
Tweets are easily photoshopped and easily verified.
My point is simply that they heat up the debate for no reason. ATS isn't that kind of place, unless it wants to be.
ATS is that kind of place for a couple of years now or didn't you read that memo?
I really did miss the memo, can you show me a copy?
Cautious clear: We found as part of the investigation, a person who has killed himself. It is highly likely that the offender who has acted alone according to the current status of investigations. For more information on the press conference to 02:00.
Vorsichtige Entwarnung:
Wir haben im Rahmen der Fahndung eine Person gefunden, die sich selbst getötet hat. Dabei handelt es sich mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit um den Täter, der nach jetzigem Ermittlungsstand alleine agiert hat.
Nähere Informationen auf der Pressekonferenz gegen 02.00 Uhr.