It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rebels in Syria behead boy in 'mistake'
Gruesome video footage has emerged of Syrian rebels beheading a young boy, in what leaders of the group involved called an "individual mistake."
...
But al-Quds denied the boy had anything to do with the group, saying that he was not a prisoner and lived with his family -- "one among a number of poor families living in areas controlled by the terrorists."
In a statement posted on their Facebook page, the rebel group involved, Nour al-Din Zenky Movement, called the killing an "individual mistake" and said it would investigate "the human rights abuses that were shared on social media sites."
Somehow I fear someone will try and justify this "mistake"
" It added that the men involved had been detained and turned over to a "judicial committee" appointed to lead the investigation.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420
Don't trust a word they tell you
Somehow I fear someone will try and justify this "mistake"
It looks like they already are!
originally posted by: DigitalVigilante420
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420
Don't trust a word they tell you
Somehow I fear someone will try and justify this "mistake"
It looks like they already are!
Sadly I meant within site membership.
It seems that no matter the atrocity there's always a justification for it, if it was done by our boys or their underlings.
The statement added that such abuses are "individual errors that represent neither our typical practices nor our general policies."
WORTHINESS FOR U.S. MILITARY SUPPORT
In addition to meeting political criteria, any Syria rebel unit being considered for U.S. or allied military assistance should be measured against a broad set of military criteria. As described above, Harakat Hazm appears to rate well on several benchmarks:
- Ideology: It is a moderate/secularist faction, not an extremist/jihadist group.
originally posted by: ColCurious
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420
This statement:
The statement added that such abuses are "individual errors that represent neither our typical practices nor our general policies."
is a blatant lie.
The Nour al-Din al-Zenk are largely made up by fighters known as the Hazzm Movement with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, and support by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
The U.S. was warned not to support them, for example because their slogan is:
"(united) to fight against the disbelievers collectively"...
Kind of a red flag you would think.
Not to mention, Amnesty International pointed out their warcrimes several times.
The U.S. instead chose to follow the assessment of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (won't comment since I'm German) which is:
Syria's Harakat Hazm are moderate rebels worth supporting.
Have a look:
WORTHINESS FOR U.S. MILITARY SUPPORT
In addition to meeting political criteria, any Syria rebel unit being considered for U.S. or allied military assistance should be measured against a broad set of military criteria. As described above, Harakat Hazm appears to rate well on several benchmarks:
- Ideology: It is a moderate/secularist faction, not an extremist/jihadist group.
Source: WINEP re: Hazzm