DOE Atmospheric Science Meeting this month = Chemtrail evaluations??

Originally posted by dh
Yes, Howard - 3, 5 and 6 are rather good and I'll be hanging on to them for further reference.
Number 4 looks like perhaps some evidence of sylph activity way back then
Thanks

Although having looked at the other chemtrail thread currently upfront, which appears to carry similarly tagged URLs, I'm a bit confused
Somebody's hoaxing?

[edit on 24-1-2005 by dh]

I'm sorry dh but you lost me -- on one thing when your refer to Number 4 as sylph activity and on your second paragraph?

I could just be tired from doing snow but I'm confused.

thanks

jm

Originally posted by justme1640

Originally posted by dh
Yes, Howard - 3, 5 and 6 are rather good and I'll be hanging on to them for further reference.
Number 4 looks like perhaps some evidence of sylph activity way back then
Thanks

Although having looked at the other chemtrail thread currently upfront, which appears to carry similarly tagged URLs, I'm a bit confused
Somebody's hoaxing?

[edit on 24-1-2005 by dh]

I'm sorry dh but you lost me -- on one thing when your refer to Number 4 as sylph activity and on your second paragraph?

I could just be tired from doing snow but I'm confused.

thanks

jm

'Doing snow'? I presume you mean heavy East Coast storms rather than nasal inhalations

The second paragraph refers to a current thread going here

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The sylph reference is in this context a diversion from the main topic for which I apologise, but if you want to study the subject, here

educate-yourself.org...

Going to check out the links -- thanks and Yes -- I meant the East Coast Snowstorm Snow

I would imagine that he other kind would also result in some confusion though too

Thanks again
jm

Originally posted by dh

Although having looked at the other chemtrail thread currently upfront, which appears to carry similarly tagged URLs, I'm a bit confused
Somebody's hoaxing?

[edit on 24-1-2005 by dh]

Most definitley

They lifted a bunch of pics from airliners.net but had to credit them when the lawyers got involved. Airliners.net protects it's copyrights.

Originally posted by HowardRoark


Most definitley

They lifted a bunch of pics from airliners.net but had to credit them when the lawyers got involved. Airliners.net protects it's copyrights.

And you and your pal the biggest hoaxers of all? Is that right?

What are you talking about?


I was talking about the thread about the contrail pictures taken from a plane.

I don't know about you sometimes, dh.