Reports of multiple officers down in Baton Rouge - CONFIRMED

Another thread just opened:
BLM calls for American Coup



Are they bad guys yet?

Or is this just another form of 'community organizing'?

Here is something I thought was interesting:

www.thecommonsenseshow.com...

I understand this is Dave Hodge's Common Sense Show but I thought a message from one of his listeners bears mentioning.

"I am a nurse in Baton Rouge and I am aware that we are receiving massive amounts of shipments of blood that could be used for transfusions and we are also receiving pain medication. I lived through Katrina and did not see this kind of spike.

"I feel that something big is about to happen."

This was posted EIGHT days ago.

Just thought it worth mentioning.

originally posted by: texasgirl
Here is something I thought was interesting:

www.thecommonsenseshow.com...

I understand this is Dave Hodge's Common Sense Show but I thought a message from one of his listeners bears mentioning.

"I am a nurse in Baton Rouge and I am aware that we are receiving massive amounts of shipments of blood that could be used for transfusions and we are also receiving pain medication. I lived through Katrina and did not see this kind of spike.

"I feel that something big is about to happen."

This was posted EIGHT days ago.

Just thought it worth mentioning.

WOW!! Interesting info for sure!! Thanks for posting texasgirl

a reply to: texasgirl

Is there anything to corroborate it?

No offense of course, just asking. I can come on ats and make a post about impending martial law and use my profession to bolster my credibility about it. Doesn't make it true, though.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy

I doubt it. BLM doesn't seem to be a threat in regards to "sedition, or rebellion, against the U.S. and conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction".

I think the comparison is laughable at best.

Apparently a judge thought that the Michigan Militia didn't pose a threat either.
But, who made a comparison???

You asked for proof that the government was arresting people in militias without reason.

The judge didn't see any reason.

a reply to: butcherguy

Being acquitted of a crime is not the same as a judge saying a person was arrested for no reason.

Not even remotely the same thing.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: texasgirl

Is there anything to corroborate it?

No offense of course, just asking. I can come on ats and make a post about impending martial law and use my profession to bolster my credibility about it. Doesn't make it true, though.

I will definitely see what I can find and will post. Again, I just thought it was worth mentioning, considering what happened yesterday.

a reply to: texasgirl

Absolutely interesting. If true, it would certainly add a whooooole other layer to the events. Would be interesting to learn if something similar happened in Dallas, as well.

Hi All of you. It's time for everybody to consider following " MOTHER NATURE LAW " It is very simple and it works.
TREAT EVERYBODY THE WAY YOU WANT TO BE TREATED !! then we won't be constantly waking up to more dead people.
Peace!!

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: butcherguy

Being acquitted of a crime is not the same as a judge saying a person was arrested for no reason.

Not even remotely the same thing.

Okay, I will post it again... just for you:
Source

A federal judge on Tuesday gutted the government's case against seven members of a U.S. militia, dismissing the most serious charges in an extraordinary defeat for federal authorities who insisted they had captured homegrown rural extremists poised for war.

The JUDGE gutted it. Dismissing charges.

The charges were dismissed by the judge at the request of the defense..... Dismissed by the judge, NOT A JURY.

Roberts granted requests for acquittal on the most serious charges: conspiring to commit sedition, or rebellion, against the U.S. and conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction.

So are you saying that the judge is giving the prosecution a big KUDOS for bringing the case before the court when there was not enough evidence to warrant a trial???

Another case of the government trying to make it look like there is something there when it wasn't there. Read... 'Extraordinary defeat'.

a reply to: butcherguy

Okay, I will repeat myself, in simpler terms for you. She found that the government had not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. And said so in her ruling. At no point did she state the defendants were arrested without cause.

It was not at the request of the defense. It was after arguments were heard from both the prosecution and defense.

mobile.nytimes.com...

Acquitted - articles.latimes.com...

Oop, they also had their civil lawsuit, in which they alleged insufficient probable cause for arrest, tossed out for not providing any substantive evidence to rebut the probable cause, which the grand jury had signed off on when handing down the indictments.

www.splcenter.org...

Not sure if this has been posted here yet.

Baton Rouge Police Ambush: Cop Killer Didn't Make 911 Call

BATON ROUGE, Louisiana — The gunman who killed three Baton Rouge police officers did not lure them to their deaths on Sunday but instead carried out the ambush after a member of the public called 911, an official told NBC News.

Police do not think that tipster was the attacker or an accomplice, Louisiana State Police Col. Mike Edmonson said.

Still doesn't necessarily rule out a trap...calling yourself vs getting someone else to do it.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Early in the reporting frenzy, I read on the Huffington Post that the original 911 caller stated that there were two armed men shooting at each other.

Then that story just disappeared?????

a reply to: Shamrock6
I followed that case very carefully because I had met some of those folks, including the FBI infiltrator who caused the charges to be brought. The judge threw out the case because the only person recorded making any threats at all was the infiltrator. That was simply a botched FBI "sting" made in attempt to frighten anyone who might think of aligning themselves with a militia. Funny thing is, most of the people who met the FBI guy didn't have any trouble figuring out that he was a potential problem. He was being shunned and knew he was ineffective so he trumped up stuff to get arrest warrants. If memory serves me it was discovered that he lied on most of the affidavits for the arrests but was never charged with perjury. He was also the one trying to distribute illegal weapons at a meet-up in Kentucky.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Cowardly acts like these only inflame tensions.

This discredits any activism towards British violence against the american colonies. It makes the British soldiers the victims.

No doubt, completely agree. People need to lay down their muskets and just peacefully protest the crown in their designated free speech zones.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

But now we have BLM supporters ambushing police (both white and black) and killing them. For what?

I hate talking to people your age because your generation is lost when it comes to reality as a whole...for both sides. You only have the thoughts to think one way it is not intelligent enough to continue a conversation with a person that cannot look at both sides of an argument.

1. A cop shoots a young black male claiming he was charged and the youth fought with him to get his gun. The boy died. 2. The black community decides to riot, loot, steal and cause property damage for multiple days. 3. In a court of law, the cop is found innocent and apparently acted accordingly. 4. More black riots, stealing, etc. 5. Regardless that the white cop was found innocent, his life and career is gone.

his life and career is gone.

You have the mentality of some one born in the late 50s early 60s and if that is so, that means that you learned from people thoughts from the 30s and 20s. This kind of mentality is not suited for 2016 in no way shape or form. You are just completely lost in the new generation, the new age of thinking…its irrelevant what you say or think in these times because it truly just does not make sense in this time or era.

I will have to excuse my self from this conversation because you just do not make sense and its not just sense its common sense that you lack. Your generation has screwed this world up and are still doing it with no conscious any knowledge and no reality of what is real in this world….and it’s sad.

Last post on this subject do to a lack of common biased sense.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Early in the reporting frenzy, I read on the Huffington Post that the original 911 caller stated that there were two armed men shooting at each other.

Then that story just disappeared?????

There is a video posted on page 14 of this thread made just across the street from the shooting in which the shots are clearly heard. The lady making the video speaks of "him" and describes how he is dressed. She speaks only of "him" not of them. It is about 4 minutes. The shooting can clearly be heard but at the end she says that the police "need to get him" as though they haven't contained him at that point. If the video is real, and I have no reason to doubt that it is, it would seem that the people in that video saw only one guy.

a reply to: diggindirt

Funny. You'd think the judge would've mentioned that at some point in her ruling.

Or that it would've counted as substantive evidence during the civil suit.

Yet neither happened.

originally posted by: diggindirt

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Early in the reporting frenzy, I read on the Huffington Post that the original 911 caller stated that there were two armed men shooting at each other.

Then that story just disappeared?????

There is a video posted on page 14 of this thread made just across the street from the shooting in which the shots are clearly heard. The lady making the video speaks of "him" and describes how he is dressed. She speaks only of "him" not of them. It is about 4 minutes. The shooting can clearly be heard but at the end she says that the police "need to get him" as though they haven't contained him at that point. If the video is real, and I have no reason to doubt that it is, it would seem that the people in that video saw only one guy.

Yeah, I saw that video. The video is fine and there's no reason to doubt any portion of it. However, the video could have been shot after the alleged gun fight between the two men, before the police arrived. There was a clear police presence by the time that video was shot.

If there was a gun fight, then the second man is in the wind, or the police don't want him to know they're looking for him.

The Huffington Post made it clear in their reporting, and still holds the page's headline claiming that police were not lured into a trap.

a reply to: Shamrock6

It was not at the request of the defense.

So, did the prosecution request acquittal? If not, who was it?

Roberts granted requests for acquittal on the most serious charges:

The prosecution had no case, or the judge would not have thrown it out.
You can think, as a cop, that every arrest is a good arrest, but this was a sting that failed.
An Eric Holder led sting operation.