It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Oh man that is rich, sorry people are unwilling to listen to the people who are currently letting the freaking reality TV star be their candidate. He is just as bad as hillary.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Perfect, talk about dividing!!
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Perfect, talk about dividing!!
And here... I thought the reason this country is so divided was all Obama's fault. He's responsible for everything people don't want to take responsibility for. He's responsible for the hatred we see in many posts here. He's responsible for the division in this country. We're just puppets who've been manipulated by him. And we're all divided and stuff...
Damn You, Obama!
We don't want a dictator who decided he can write or change laws by himself...
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: sirlancelot
How fitting a left winger excusing her for being the liar she is. I guess the ends justifies the means though right?
I did not make any excuse for her. Yes, she is a liar. So are you.
Are you going to sit upon your high horse and say that you are some beacon of virtue that has never lied?
Hypocrite.
originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Realtruth
If not lying and being a role model are your requirements for the highest office in the USA, you better be turning in an empty ballot this November.
The difference between people that are liars, on ATS, and Hillary Clinton is that she is running for the highest office in the USA.
Also the president should be a role model for our young, but have instead become a beacon of cancer for how to justify bad morals, behavior, and ethics.
It's disgusting to see people justifying any of this whether it's from Clinton, Trump, or any other candidate.
originally posted by: introvert
We elect people. Not robots. To hold someone to a higher standard than you hold yourself is disingenuous and hypocritical.
The role models for the young should be their parents and those they are surrounded by. Why are people allowing their kids to be affected by political matters? Don't parents raise the kids, or do they let the TV do it for them?
It's not about justifying someone's actions. It's about accepting reality about human nature.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Oh man that is rich, sorry people are unwilling to listen to the people who are currently letting the freaking reality TV star be their candidate. He is just as bad as hillary.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: sirlancelot
1.Trump is advocating war- guess who pays for that.
Also those kids getting degrees will then get jobs which guess what, pay taxes for the subzidies on the schools.
2. That number changes every time, but to say they are unvettable is your own opinion not a fact.
3. More opinion, but one I could agree with a bit more.
4. Muh guuuuns! She can't cripple it, you all said the same about Obama and gun sales just went up.
5. Well they didn't prosecute.
6. And Trump had zero record or any experience.
7. War means higher taxes too, we have to pay for it somehow.
They both suck, I won't be voting for either.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
The real reason Clinton will get votes is because more people can't stand Trump than her.