Brilliant Light Power Demonstration, June 28th 2016

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Mills made additional discoveries that caused him to abandon that plan.

Right. I wonder if the discovery that it doesn't produce power was one of them.

Maybe this will be the one... but unfortunately probably not.

Lots of evidence to suggest that in the early 20th century Tesla had a practical and proven method for delivering free energy to any point on Earth, but we all know what happened with his work. And since then, there have been dozens if not hundreds of claims of free energy, cold fusion, and other 'overunity' technologies. I refuse to give up hope, as I personally believe govt black projects must already be making use of some of these.

Perhaps some day, mass production/distribution of a tech something like this will be allowed, and it will end war, starvation, and economic inequality forever. Then we can all join hands and sing Kumbaya.

No offense AnarchoCapitalist- I hope it happens, I really, really do. But I'll believe it when I see it.

a reply to: Phage

Oh, this time is for real!
...
BTW, you cannot get 100 billion whatnots out of a liter of water. Even nuclear fusion needs a 55 gallon barrel of fuel to run for a whole year. And they have only made a plasma last six minutes at the W7-X which was not at fusion temps even.

Lets do the maths! 55 gallons... uh, we'll do "new" math and guestimate, so, 52 paychecks a year is 52 gallons every two weeks, or, 1 gallon a week. So, calling BS on the 100 billion whatnots right there!

a reply to: Phage

bloody brilliant Phage, i'm beside myself.

a reply to: M4nWithNoN4me

Tesla made use of 2 things; the potential difference between sky & earth, and tapping off the Schumann resonance using a so-called hetrodyne oscillator. There are other ways of tapping the sea of energy we are in. Yes the gubmint has some incredible toys to play with that we won't probably ever see.

Fusion is easy, practical, and already here, i might do a thread on that sometime if it doesnt get me bumped off....

But all i see here is fuzzy vids that could be anything & a lot of almost-science-but-not-quite talking.
If i get really bored i will go through more of it.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

are these key words 'four months away' a perpetual occurrance with blp? just curious

What about this guy, Anthony Marchese that NIAC, ( NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts) gave a P1 grant to study possible rocket propulsion using 'hydrinos'.
As for the presentation, it's supposed to be a live link, while there might be some pre arranged stills that show up on the screen, it seems like a live link, not a video.

a reply to: smurfy

What about this guy, Anthony Marchese that NIAC, ( NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts) gave a P1 grant to study possible rocket propulsion using 'hydrinos'.

13 years ago. $75k for a 6 month feasibility study. I guess it wasn't feasible.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy

What about this guy, Anthony Marchese that NIAC, ( NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts) gave a P1 grant to study possible rocket propulsion using 'hydrinos'.

13 years ago. $75k for a 6 month feasibility study. I guess it wasn't feasible.

Well, at least he's still living, doing well, and involved in multi-million projects, so seemingly not losing credibility since he did say at the time he was quite confident that there was no fraud involved with BLP. It seems he didn't like bullies either.
I do wonder about his research though. Still, you don't know.

a reply to: smurfy

NIAC is awesome
www.nasa.gov...

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

are these key words 'four months away' a perpetual occurrance with blp? just curious

Yes. How else would they keep the suckers coming in?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy

NIAC is awesome
www.nasa.gov...

Who said they were not? but thanks for the link anyway. BTW I have Anthony Marchese et al conclusions at P1 on a PDF, in a word or three, they were to apply for a P2. I don't have that thus far.

a reply to: smurfy

You won't share?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy

You won't share?

Why not? but why should you be bothered, it's all nonsense, you said so typically dismissively, "I guess not"

The BlackLight Rocket Engine page -37
NIAC Phase I Final Report (May 1 – November 30, 2002)
Phase II funding is justified to continue this work. Accordingly, the team plans to submit a Phase
II proposal that will focus on the following objectives:
ƒ Perform independent experiments with additional diagnostics and consult with plasma
physics experts to validate previously published spectroscopic data on energetic mixed
gas H2 plasmas.
ƒ Consult with experts to develop a method to validate excess energy experiments.
ƒ Complete testing of BLPT thruster with various propellant combinations, pressures and
power input to determine optimum operating conditions based on measured C*.
ƒ Complete development of BLMPT thruster hardware, install BLMPT thruster into vacuum
test chamber and probe exhaust flow using laser alignment system to attempt to
measure exhaust velocity using Doppler shift.
ƒ Run BLMPT with He/H2, Ar/H2, H2O propellants and determine optimum operating
conditions.
ƒ Design, build and test a thrust stand to accurately measure thrust, specific impulse (Isp)
and overall thruster efficiency (η) for the BLPT and BLMPT thrusters.
ƒ Develop a theoretical model of BLPT and/or BLMPT performance for integration into
space vehicle mission studies.
Examine other concepts to convert random fast hydrogen to directed fast hydrogen and
examine other concepts to convert plasma power into useful power source for spacebased
applications.


Last para kind of says everything in these arrangements. Kind of, it's not yours, it's mine thing.

www.niac.usra.edu...

a reply to: smurfy

Consult with experts to develop a method to validate excess energy experiments.

So. It didn't work
And, apparently NIAC did not take him up on a proposal for further study.

Yes yes yes, black water energy and the US will collapse by summer of 2014. Is that right? What year is it again?

I wonder if you'll be man enough to admit when you're wrong, and apologize for pushing nonsense in 4 months this time. Did you learn your lesson yet?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy

Consult with experts to develop a method to validate excess energy experiments.

So. It didn't work
And, apparently NIAC did not take him up on a proposal for further study.

I don't know if it worked or not, the idea was for better measuring equipment, ...that's pathetic, I should expect more from you.
But like I said, Anthony Marchese is doing quite well, one way or the other.

a reply to: smurfy

I don't know if it worked or not, the idea was for better measuring equipment,

Actually, it looks more like he was looking for someone to be able to say it worked since he was unable to.

But like I said, Anthony Marchese is doing quite well, one way or the other.

In the field of biofuels? Yes, it would seem so.

originally posted by: playswithmachines
a reply to: M4nWithNoN4me

Tesla made use of 2 things; the potential difference between sky & earth, and tapping off the Schumann resonance using a so-called hetrodyne oscillator.

Tesla didn't believe in the ionosphere. Tesla didn't know about the 'Schumann resonance'. The Schumann resonance isn't magical or mystical, it's the resonance of the Earth-ionosphere waveguide. It doesn't create energy.

"Heterodyne" is a word with meaning, "oscillator" is a word with meaning. Combined, it doesn't really go together other than, maybe, 'an oscillator used for heterodyning' which everyone would call a local oscillator. But there's no TYPE of oscillator called 'heterodyne'. And again, it's not a source of energy at all.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: playswithmachines
a reply to: M4nWithNoN4me

Tesla made use of 2 things; the potential difference between sky & earth, and tapping off the Schumann resonance using a so-called hetrodyne oscillator.

Tesla didn't believe in the ionosphere. Tesla didn't know about the 'Schumann resonance'. The Schumann resonance isn't magical or mystical, it's the resonance of the Earth-ionosphere waveguide. It doesn't create energy.

"Heterodyne" is a word with meaning, "oscillator" is a word with meaning. Combined, it doesn't really go together other than, maybe, 'an oscillator used for heterodyning' which everyone would call a local oscillator. But there's no TYPE of oscillator called 'heterodyne'. And again, it's not a source of energy at all.

I thought that everything in the Universe is energy.