It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: [post=20947258]BlueAjah
Comey said she broke the law. Which is what we have been saying.
"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
Just to be clear...Nowhere does he say she broke the law. That is what a court would need to conclude. What he chose to say was "there is EVIDENCE of POTENTIAL violations of the statutes"...NOT evidence of violations of the statutes..or "violation of the statutes".....He qualified it ...evidence of "potential" violations...Not sufficient evidence or potential to warrant an indictment though.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Honestly, I don't know what people would expect. It's not as if the presence OR the absence of Hillary Clinton in this election or AFTER this election matters one damn bit. It's all going to be the same damn thing no matter whose face you have to watch in TV for the next 4-8 years. The only thing that will change will be the narrative. The agenda will be exactly the same.
No one seems to want to face this. I guess it's because it means we're just plain screwed. Nobody likes reality when it sounds like that.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen
Funny that Clinton is still 10 points ahead of him.
Maybe you're counting backwards or something?
originally posted by: RickinVa
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Exactlyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. So why does Hillary possess a valid security clearance from the State Department? They refuse to comment about that.
Another consideration for voters to look at with both eyes open. This scandal is not going away.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen
Funny that Clinton is still 10 points ahead of him.
Maybe you're counting backwards or something?
It's +4.6 for Clinton according to the RCP averages.
Huffpost average is at +5.0 Clinton
The latest poll (July 4th Morning Consult) has Clinton ahead by 1 point.
Not that any of that matters much - The swing states are the most important. Some pretty close numbers there...most within the margin or error.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: RickinVa
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Exactlyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. So why does Hillary possess a valid security clearance from the State Department? They refuse to comment about that.
Another consideration for voters to look at with both eyes open.
This scandal is not going away.
originally posted by: RickinVa
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
Exactlyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. So why does Hillary possess a valid security clearance from the State Department? They refuse to comment about that.
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
People here care way too much who the president is, it's almost like they're paid to care because people I talk to don't care that much.
Only really dumb people, the kind of person who thinks putting out a yard sign has any influence whatsoever on people act like this.