It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: NOTurTypical
So nobody since is allowed to see god because this one guy ate some forbidden fruit?
You can try to convince me of the veracity of that, but to me that part is misinterpreted, too.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: NOTurTypical
So nobody since is allowed to see god because this one guy ate some forbidden fruit?
You can try to convince me of the veracity of that, but to me that part is misinterpreted, too.
What did Jesus say?
How many people had ever seen Father?
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: NOTurTypical
That's true, they are the one exception, because basically, they were responsible for sending Jesus to his death via the Romans, who only did it to satisfy a frenzied Jewish mob. They made a choice, even though they saw the miracles and prophesy being fulfilled in Jesus.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: NOTurTypical
That's true, they are the one exception, because basically, they were responsible for sending Jesus to his death via the Romans, who only did it to satisfy a frenzied Jewish mob. They made a choice, even though they saw the miracles and prophesy being fulfilled in Jesus.
I have one problem with your explanation and that is that the HS (pentacost) had not yet been given .
Nobody could be saved, nobody is perfect. Even after conversion. Example, Peter received the Holy Ghost in John chapter 10, but denied Christ to 3 people the night of Jesus' arrest.
What did Jesus say?
Marjoe Gortner
Hugh Marjoe Ross Gortner (generally known as Marjoe Gortner; born January 14, 1944 in Long Beach, California) is a controversial former evangelist preacher and actor. He first gained public attention during the late 1940s when his parents arranged for him at age four to be ordained as a preacher, due to his extraordinary speaking ability; he was the youngest known in that position. As a young man, he preached on the revival circuit and brought celebrity to the revival movement.[1]
He became a celebrity during the 1970s when he starred in Marjoe (1972), a behind-the-scenes documentary about the lucrative business of Pentecostal preaching. This won the 1972 Academy Award for Best Documentary Film. This documentary is now noted as one of the most vehement criticisms of Pentecostal preaching.
But surely knowing that the gift is free, that the Spirit grants a power beyond anything and that there is love and acceptance in God and in fellowship, to remain in a position of apostasy requires a hardness and psychopathy that would never allow them to be repentant.
6:4For concerning those who were once enlightened and tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5and tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the age to come, 6and then fell away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance; seeing they crucify the Son of God for themselves again, and put him to open shame.
I know why I'm not a Christian.
I was raised in a Christian home. All that I was taught reflected the presupposition that it was all true. The only worldview presented was very narrow.
God created the World 6,000 years ago, and gave man a pure truth. Men rebelled against a clearly, unmistakable visible truth about the creator and made up false gods, which were really Satan and other fallen angels, who also had unmistakable knowledge of the true God but defiantly rebelled.
When I was a teenager, I turned my life over to God because I felt the Spirit call me to Jesus. I became filled with the Holy Spirit. And began to share the good news to my friends. To most of what I said, I got back a blank stare. But that didn't deter me.
I went to college to learn how to effectively share Christ. It was a Christian college of the same denomination that I was raised in, therefore no alternative worldview was presented to me, nothing to challenge the only truth I knew.
From Church History, and comparison of historic creeds and confessions and the various prominent theologians, it struck me that Christianity was way bigger than my tiny worldview, could not be contained or limited to my denomination. I dropped out of college, the one that would have prepared me to preach a narrow world view.
Over the next decade, I continued to see Christianity as bigger and bigger in inclusiveness which resulted in the question "One Christ, One Spirit" yet so many different expressions. What then is the minimum requirement to be a Christian and be one in spirit with all other Christians. (Ecumenical Paradox).
The world grew bigger, the absolute essential core of Christianity grew smaller. The limited worldview I grew up with had exploded like an old wineskin, and in the ruins I wandered crying out like a demoniac. After ten years of this, I just couldn't take it any more. Judaism taught all foreign gods were evil demons. Christianity swallowed that notion wholesale. Greek and Roman culture at the "time of Christ" had a completely different view of demons.
If a god is a demon, and if the genius of man is a demon, and if concepts and ideas are demons, then what's that make the Holy Spirit? I better not say it, because that would be an unmistakable example of the unforgivable sin.
Probably. Doesn't matter, whether the term exists or not, the paradox is there. Look it up, Google or something.
en.wikipedia.org...
Ecumenical apologetics is "an explanation (defense) of the Christian Faith, in an ecumenical fashion";[1] presenting a defense of the faith while advocating and recognizing "a greater sense of shared spirituality"[2] with those of other faiths.
While neither apologetics nor ecumenism is a new term, "ecumenical apologetics" came into use early in the 21st century in an effort to combine the two, which were previously presumed to be opposing efforts or ideas.[3] Likewise, both apologetics and ecumenism are terms used by people of varying faiths; however, the term is used primarily, if not exclusively, to refer to a form of Christian apologetics.
Yes. The last project that I undertook as a Christian Elder and Sunday School teacher was to teach "The Essentials of Christianity". I felt it was necessary due to having overheard a fellow elder say, "I don't believe Jesus was actually raised from the dead physically."
After trying my hardest to come up with the essentials which would not exclude people of good will. I gave up, couldn't be done. That's the paradox.
www.etymonline.com...
Online Etymology Dictionary
demon (n.) Look up demon at Dictionary.comc. 1200, from Latin daemon "spirit," from Greek daimon "deity, divine power; lesser god; guiding spirit, tutelary deity" (sometimes including souls of the dead); "one's genius, lot, or fortune;" from PIE *dai-mon- "divider, provider" (of fortunes or destinies), from root *da- "to divide" (see tide (n.)).
Used (with daimonion) in Christian Greek translations and Vulgate for "god of the heathen" and "unclean spirit." Jewish authors earlier had employed the Greek word in this sense, using it to render shedim "lords, idols" in the Septuagint, and Matt. viii:31 has daimones, translated as deofol in Old English, feend or deuil in Middle English. Another Old English word for this was hellcniht, literally "hell-knight."
The original mythological sense is sometimes written daemon for purposes of distinction. The Demon of Socrates was a daimonion, a "divine principle or inward oracle." His accusers, and later the Church Fathers, however, represented this otherwise.
Originally posted by Wombocracy
a reply to: Akragon
That was my quote why. But I will try harder.
Right in the beginning.
Chapter 6 the beginning of Truth (the Holy Spirit, Spirit of Truth) unto it's completion;..." For authority has been given me through the Ineffable and through the First Mystery of all mysteries to speak with you,...
Study it out.
You know it is a very open to interpretation book. But in my study of this book I have found that the First Mystery is the Holy Spirit and so is the last.
If you want me to dig in any further you got to give me some time. I spend an hour on one page trying to piece this, what I equate to the Christian Zohar, together sometimes. It is even more mysterious than the Zohar and I am determined to master it. Not there yet but I am making progress.
Originally posted by Wombocracy
Five helpers, three triple powers. I am not going to deny it is not easy to piece together the meaning. But I enjoy trying.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: intrptr
This is where trust comes in. Believing what the gospel tells you.
Faith is all about trust.
Originally posted by Wombocracy
Good stuff.
I believe that there are 3 triple powers too. So 3,6,9 must be relevant somehow.
Originally posted by Wombocracy
I also noticed that the First, Last, Fourth and Twentieth Mystery are the same. I believe this is the Holy Spirit, Truth.
But there has to be more to that last riddle.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: NOTurTypical
I have one problem with your explanation and that is that the HS (pentacost) had not yet been given .
Nobody could be saved, nobody is perfect. Even after conversion. Example, Peter received the Holy Ghost in John chapter 10, but denied Christ to 3 people the night of Jesus' arrest.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: NOTurTypical
How can we account for Judas Iscariot then ??