Endless bigotry

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Nah it should be



with this in the background.





I mean come on OP seeing people smile leads your thoughts to gays? lol funny.

a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

That's a nice image too - but while I sound flippant, the technique I gave him above actually could help him....

LOL!!

@ reldra:



@OP:
Maybe should have rethought your username - but it's too late now....live up to it!

a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

No this:

originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat
bobs_uruncle

So... let me see if I get it:

Equal rights for LGBT individuals equates to "societies bearings degrading"?

Am I getting it?

Nice try at baiting lol. I didn't say any specific facet of society was degrading, it's degrading in general. If you read into it the wrong way, that's on you.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You were being serious and being nice.

I have no problem with ruining the 'safe space' for this OP and ' Triggering' him.

This is the first time I have used those terms. I finally have a use for them.

bobs_uruncle

Is it really that far fetched to assume as much, considering the subject matter at hand?

Yeah, it's pretty messed up how the homosexuals hijacked the word "gay". I think a lot of people would be more comfortable with LGTB if it wasn't all about elevating hedonism.

Love who you want, but why turn your gay pride parade into porn simulations. It's very disturbing seeing children attending such obscene events.

All I know is that since the gays started coming out of the closet, that door is wide open now. Prepare to see freaks that will make today's appear modest.

a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

It's competely far-fetched! The topic is about gay people so what in the world makes you think he'd be talking about gay people in his reply? That's ludicrous!

/sarcasm

a reply to: Kali74

Evolution, could be one factor

What's the evolution purpose of the LGBT community? If there isn't an evolutionary purpose, then would members of the LGBT community means that they have a genetic mutation or a mental illness. If it's a mental illness, shouldn't those people get help? Instead of being used as a political tool. If it's a genetic mutation, then that opens up a debate is how society should judge abnormal sexual desires. Normal sexual behavior is 6 women partners for males and 4 male partners for women. Which abnormal sexual behaviors should be acceptable, which should be tolerated, and which should be taboo?

I mean, If you think a 13 year old boy can "know" he's a girl and should be treated like a girl, and that's brave of him for thinking that. Then how do you tell another 13 year old boy that he cannot "know" that he wants to have sex with the subway spokesman?

a reply to: Kali74

Evolution, could be one factor

What's the evolution purpose of the LGBT community? If there isn't an evolutionary purpose, then would members of the LGBT community means that they have a genetic mutation or a mental illness. If it's a mental illness, shouldn't those people get help? Instead of being used as a political tool. If it's a genetic mutation, then that opens up a debate is how society should judge abnormal sexual desires. Normal sexual behavior is 6 women partners for males and 4 male partners for women. Which abnormal sexual behaviors should be acceptable, which should be tolerated, and which should be taboo?

I mean, If you think a 13 year old boy can "know" he's a girl and should be treated like a girl, and that's brave of him for thinking that. Then how do you tell another 13 year old boy that he cannot "know" that he wants to have sex with the subway spokesman?

double post

originally posted by: harvestdog
Yeah, it's pretty messed up how the homosexuals hijacke the word "gay"..

It is beyond ridiculous that you typed that in a serious manner.

a reply to: thinline

I can't have more than 4 male partners? I must have some sort of mutation, it is already way too late for that.

a reply to: thinline

It's not known whether homosexuality, bi-sexuality or transgenderism has an evolutionary function or not. We're over 7 billion people on the planet now... maybe this is natures way of telling us to slow down.

You guys! Seriously, try my recipe above!

It's awesome. Try it, and tell me how you experienced it.

The Music and the Image and the Breathing.....

I'm about to do it again - round 3. It's a great package!!



I'm having a good time anyway -

originally posted by: harvestdog

All I know is that since the gays started coming out of the closet, that door is wide open now.

They were 'out of the closet' in ancient times. You may mean the US version of 'out of the closet', that would be the late 1950s. What has come out of the 'wide open door' since the late 1950s?

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: harvestdog
Yeah, it's pretty messed up how the homosexuals hijacke the word "gay"..

It is beyond ridiculous that you typed that in a serious manner.

gay (n.) Look up gay at Dictionary.com
"a (usually male) homosexual," by 1971, from gay (adj.). In Middle English it meant "excellent person, noble lady, gallant knight," also "something gay or bright; an ornament or badge" (c. 1400).

etymonline

originally posted by: harvestdog


All I know is that since the gays started coming out of the closet, that door is wide open now. Prepare to see freaks that will make today's appear modest.

Sounds like fun!

I hope we heterosexual freaks will be allowed to participate. I'll bring the tequila, the baby oil and the leather accouterments.

a reply to: harvestdog

People in Victorian times meant it as a happy and often sexually liberated person. It was later used as a pejorative to describe homosexual people. It was not hijacked by homosexual people.