It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: everyone
Should a police officer who swore he would uphold the law who then publicly proclaims that the law should be ignored be allowed to keep his job too?
originally posted by: Phage
...
B) Those guys understood that, at its core, the Constitution is a framework and that society evolves.
...
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: introvert
TOO bad, we took an oath and they haven't absolved us of it so it REMAINS in place,because WE will kill for it.
WE couldn't care LESS what the HIPPIEBELT of education sh#ts out.
THAT is America, NOT Princeton or P.C. or any OTHER popular cultural movement to dismiss it.
originally posted by: sycomix
a reply to: introvert
The Constitution and Bill of Rights DO NOT have an expiration date. They are the supreme law of the land in the USA. Get on board or get out. Nobody said you have to be here.
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: introvert
" Do you believe his act of voicing his opinion (free speech) should lead to him being taken off his bench? "
If his Personal Thoughts Conflict with his Ability to be Far and Balanced concerning his Court Decisions , then yes , he should Resign as a First Choice , then if he refuses , take Him to Court .
So basically any judge or elected official that doesn't agree with your personal beliefs should be impeached?
Should a police officer who swore he would uphold the law who then publicly proclaims that the law should be ignored be allowed to keep his job too?
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: xuenchen
Not surprising, especially coming from "Slate"! What a rag......
I wonder what laws this so called "judge" wants to rule by? Is he cool with ending Democracy?
originally posted by: xuenchen
Deluxe comments coming from a U.S. Federal Judge about the U.S. Constitution.
Judge Richard Posner (7th Circuit) says he sees no reason for judges to study the Constitution !!
He claims it's too old and not up with today's culture.
He sees no value in studying any of it.
Sounds like he's really out of touch if you ask me.
I bet Obama agrees 100%.
Federal Judge: U.S. Constitution Is Outdated, Judges Should Stop Studying It
According to 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner in a post published to Slate, U.S. judges should stop studying the Constitution.
“I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation,” Posner argued.
Judge Richard Posner (7th Circuit) says he sees no reason for judges to study the Constitution !!
originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: ImmortalLegend527
The only people the Constitution "controls" are government employees.
The population is protected by it from abuses of power.
If the government isn't controlled and limited, than they can do whatever they want and the population becomes powerless, the only recourse at that point is revolution - or we can bend over and enjoy the tyranny - whichever.
Judges better study that Constitution real closely, for the sake of all humanity and to save the foundation of civilization itself.
originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: xuenchen
A clear case of a judge aiding and abetting the slide of the US into the black hole of tyranny.