Is space and the universe real?

a reply to: InhaleExhale

A "Sheraid" is a transgender mermaid.

Yeah nah, he meant "charade" but you knew that.😃

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: Night Star
Why do people keep questioning reality lately? Seems pretty damned real to me.

You are entitled to your opinion. But you know what Descartes said (more or less); "I think therefore I am."

Take it a step further, "I think not..."

Therefore I'm not?
So if we empty our minds we cease to exist? Or does everything else cease to exist? Until we think again.....thought creating reality...no thought, no reality....😳
We recreate reality every time we wake...when we sleep, we're in a different reality (often a nonsensical one) 🤔
That explains the state of the world, we're all in different realities, with some people thinking their reality is the only real one

okay take a look at this.... but before you watch please consider this....

At about 0:35 seconds the rocket is still up in the stratosphere. That's nearly 100kms up. Then watch as in about 15 seconds it's able to come down through the atmophere covering 100kms in 15 seconds and land. That's IMPOSSIBLE! The average time it would take even a jet to come straight down that far would be at least 5 to 10 minutes. pLEASE THINK ABOUT THIS OKAY. It can't pass through the atmophere in 15 seconds like they show in this video. And this video is from space X.

0:35 seconds to about 1:05 when it lands (but there was a pause as well when he was talking. So minus the pause gives you like 20 seconds...GET REAL!)



now watch how long it actually takes to fall that far: Jumps at: 3:35 lands at: deploys shut at 7:35 at least several miles up. So that's a full 4 minutes. So say he kept falling, you're looking at at least 6 minutes to reach the earth, not 15 seconds like in the space X video. Now can you see how fake space X is? So if it's fake that means it's all fake, just as myself and so many others have been trying to tell everyone.

a reply to: daaskapital how can we be sure it is not illusion? What news and science sources are trustable?
Perhaps it is an earth within an earth within another planet?
I was told there is a molten fire source within the planet in which to gather fuel from.

a reply to: lavatrance

First.... define real!

Do i really need to quote Morpheus for you???

Define 'real' and i will give u an answer!

originally posted by: lavatrance
okay take a look at this.... but before you watch please consider this....

At about 0:35 seconds the rocket is still up in the stratosphere. That's nearly 100kms up.

Dude, that segment was from a time lapse, it's not real time.

Then watch as in about 15 seconds it's able to come down through the atmophere covering 100kms in 15 seconds and land. That's IMPOSSIBLE!

That whole sequence took minutes of real time, not seconds. It's a time lapse.
en.wikipedia.org...

It can't pass through the atmophere in 15 seconds like they show in this video. And this video is from space X.

How about actually looking at what SpaceX said about the video?

Published on May 27, 2016
Sped up video of the Falcon 9 first-stage landing during the THAICOM 8 mission on May 27, 2016.

Not everything is a conspiracy.

a reply to: lavatrance

Not sure how to reply to this...

You really can't be serious.

I am truly convinced youtube is dumbing down the world...and the flat earth believers are at the top.

a reply to: ngchunter

Not everything is a conspiracy.

Well this is ATS so pretty much anything and everything is a conspiracy for some.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
Well this is ATS so pretty much anything and everything is a conspiracy for some.

Not everything is a conspiracy, but that does not negate the fact that genuine conspiracies have taken place at different points throughout history. Therefore, to dismiss all potential conspiracies on the basis that "not everything is a conspiracy" is folly.

a reply to: Dark Ghost

Not everything is a conspiracy,

Of course, but as I said to some everything is a conspiracy especially if NASA is involved.

a reply to: Dark Ghost

Therefore, to dismiss all potential conspiracies on the basis that "not everything is a conspiracy" is folly.

I don't dismiss all conspiracies...only the ones that have absolutely nothing that can back it up.

originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: lavatrance

First.... define real!

Do i really need to quote Morpheus for you???

Define 'real' and i will give u an answer!

okay applause. I just was hoping that there was sort of a standard to it? Like the laws of physics or something. But I suppose when someone is hypnotised, in a hypnotic state, "they are there", even though their body might not be.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Dark Ghost

Therefore, to dismiss all potential conspiracies on the basis that "not everything is a conspiracy" is folly.

I don't dismiss all conspiracies...only the ones that have absolutely nothing that can back it up.

ya except a video with obvious holes.

originally posted by: lavatrance

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Dark Ghost

Therefore, to dismiss all potential conspiracies on the basis that "not everything is a conspiracy" is folly.

I don't dismiss all conspiracies...only the ones that have absolutely nothing that can back it up.

ya except a video with obvious holes.

You haven't shown any holes. In fact you haven't replied to my post at all. I already addressed your "holes."

a reply to: Phage

"I think not....therefore i'm a politician" ??
My part of space is pretty much real to me, i don't know about the rest of you though, you may all be just figments of my deteriorating mind. Guess i will have to live with that

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

What do u think tv was designed for. To brain wash the masses. That's why it's called tv programming. Ur programmed to believe what u see coming from the tv

a reply to: ngchunter

It's low budget Hollywood special effects

I have a healthy imagination but...flat earth? Really?

Simple experiment in theory: A sphere is the most logical shape for a (fluid) object because it has the greatest volume/space ratio, Nature knows this. That is why soap bubbles are round and not flat.
Think about that for a while.........
ETA What worries me the most is that this pseudo-science quasi-religion still exists!

a reply to: playswithmachines

Besides, be careful what you wish for.......