Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE)

a reply to: Rapha

Minds so open that brains are lying all over the floor

Post of the YEAR. !!! i wont say the category it won though.... you know.. manners and decorum etc...

originally posted by: AMPTAH

The Invisible entities are just the old well known Angels and Demons.

Humans see in the visible spectrum between RED on the low end and VIOLET on the high end.

Angels are seen above the highest human vision, so they are in the ULTRAVIOLET part of the spectrum.

Demons are seen below the lowest human vision, so they are in the INFRARED part of the spectrum.

The mid range for humans is GREEN. And that is the color of the LORD of the earth, otherwise known as YWHW.

LORD = L+O+R+D = 12+15+18+4 = 49 = 7 x 7 = 49 = 7 + 18 + 5 + 5 + 14 = G + R + E + E + N = GREEN

He is the "Jealous" God.

"Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate
me; " -- KJV, Exodus 20:5

According to the Tibetan Buddhists, you meet this God on the 5th day in the Bardo when you die.

Jealous God on the FIFTH DAY

QUOTE:
"O nobly-born, listen undistractedly. On the Fifth Day, the green light of the primal form of the element air will shine upon thee... Along with it a light of dull green colour from the Asura-loka, produced from the cause of the feeling of jealousy, coming side by side with the Wisdom Rays, will shine upon thee. Meditate upon it with impartiality, -- with neither repulsion nor attraction. -- The Tibetan Book of the Dead, [The Fifth Day], pg.17
END QUOTE.

So, you see the same LORD of the Judeo-Christian Old Testament, is found with the same attributes everywhere. [Jealous, Green, Warlike, Vengeful, Wrathful, ...] and even in English Gematria the name LORD is encoded with the numerical code for GREEN.

a reply to: Rapha

If you have nothing to add to the OP, move along as this thread is beyond your understanding and open mind.

What thread are you reading, this thread is about a company that will publish anything given to them with a fee involved, I fail to see how stacking rocks that are invisible has anything to do with thread.


I guess its beyond my understanding and open mind

a reply to: AMPTAH

The Invisible entities are just the old well known Angels and Demons.

What invisible entities?

So, you see the same LORD of the Judeo-Christian Old Testament, is found with the same attributes everywhere. [Jealous, Green, Warlike, Vengeful, Wrathful, ...] and even in English Gematria the name LORD is encoded with the numerical code for GREEN.

and this relates to this thread how exactly

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: AMPTAH
What invisible entities?

Invisible entities are those beings that normal people can't usually see with their natural eyes.

However, many people can actually learn to see beyond the human vision range.

The way this skill is developed, according to various mystery schools, is by observing your own usually invisible aura.

To do this, you start in a dimly lit room, and put the tips of your fingers of your left hand to just touch the tips of your fingers on your right hand. Then, slowly pull the hands apart and concentrate on the space between the tips of your fingers. Keep looking directly in the center between the finger tips, don't follow the fingers themselves. You'll begin to see something within the space. With practice, you'll train your eyes to pick up the faint image of the aura near your finger tips. With lots of practice, some people can see entire auras of others walking down the street.

Once you have seen this "invisible" reality yourself, you will then begin understand your own question "What invisible entities?"

There's no art to the blind, nor music to the deaf, so they are entitled to say "What Painting?" and "What Sound?"

If you sleep depravate yourself you start seing these things, or some other sht, i never heard of ITE's by name but I know these "invisible" being's exists and affects our everyday life

originally posted by: AMPTAH


Humans see in the visible spectrum between RED on the low end and VIOLET on the high end.

Angels are seen above the highest human vision, so they are in the ULTRAVIOLET part of the spectrum.

Demons are seen below the lowest human vision, so they are in the INFRARED part of the spectrum.

You see by either light reflected from objects (mostly) or by light emitted from objects.

If an object reflects ambient light, it doesn't really matter what 'part of the spectrum they are seen in', a phrase that doesn't actually make sense. Because if you're looking at something in normal light, it's going to reflect something unless it's totally, perfectly transparent with the same refractive index as air. If it reflects light, you'll see it. The end.

It doesn't really matter if it's colored red, or blue, or UV, or IR. If it reflects a color you can see, you'll see that color. If not, you'll see it as gray or black.

If it's emitting a color you can't see, and it's not also optically identical with air, you'll still see it. Because you can't see through it.

YOU are emitting IR right now. It doesn't turn you invisible. Because you also reflect common light, and you are not air, you will be seen and affect the viewing of objects behind you. The whole 'on a different spectrum' thing is daft.

originally posted by: Rapha

Everything will be just fine whilst the world splits in half between those that understand and those who cannot handle the truth.

Come now, I'm sure with a bit of study and a bit of practice you will find you can handle the truth. And that truth is, the world is not flat, there aren't any invisible beings that disguise themselves as rocks, and there weren't any magical predecessors.

What you see around you is magical enough for anyone. Invisible magical pseudo-rocks aren't watching your every move and reporting it to some mystical being.

originally posted by: Bedlam


You see by either light reflected from objects (mostly) or by light emitted from objects.

What often causes confusion is that people forget that physical objects don't really emit or reflect light.

What the physical objects emit or reflect are photons, which are electromagnetic waves.

When the electromagnetic waves hit the retina at the back of the eyeball, the signal gets converted into electro-chemical signals. These charged particle signals then carry the information to the back of the brain, where they are converted into "light" as we perceive it.

So, the light of perception has little to do with the physical light that is electromagnetic waves.

There are correspondences. Like frequency ranges corresponding to color perception ranges.

So, when we say low or high frequency, there's a corresponding order in the color spectrum of perception.

So, there are two different spectra:

1) the electromagnetic frequency spectrum of the physical phenomena
2) the color spectrum of perception of the psychic experience

The confusion introduced by using the same term "light" for both these things obscures the reality of what is happening.

You can "see light" where there are no electromagnetic waves or photons.

Conversely, there can be electromagnetic waves or photons that make no impression on your sight.

In in some forms of synesthesia, beating a drum causes the individual to "see light and shapes".

Physical sound is perceived in the visual field.

So, the first thing to consider is the "mapping" between "light of perception" and "external influences".

The fact that you "see something" doesn't mean that there are photons in the external world stimulating your sensory perception.

The stimuli for the "vision" could come from many different pathways.

Once you understand this, you can conceive of how it is possible to see things that aren't there in the physical world. You wouldn't be able to capture the light with a camera, since it's not photons that are stimulating the vision.

What most often occurs, is that there is some connection between the physical world and the spiritual world, so that something might show up in a camera, or lens, like a shadow or fuzzy image, because of the same synsethetic type effect of co-stimulation occurring , but the sharpness of detail seen in the perceptual vision doesn't show up in the camera lens because most of the stimulation is arriving through a different pathway.

When you train yourself to see auras, you use the physical world's photonic stimulation like a key to open the doorway to the alternate pathways for seeing the visions beyond the physical world.

a reply to: AMPTAH

Sorry, but no. Trying to ring in perception isn't going to handwave you invisible demons and angels because IR and UV.

originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: AMPTAH

Sorry, but no. Trying to ring in perception isn't going to handwave you invisible demons and angels because IR and UV.

There really is no substitute for experience. On this we agree.

a reply to: AMPTAH

Totally. Can you believe this bedlam guy?!? He talks as if he was some expert in optical physics and refraction indexes or somethng.

I agree with you btw about perceptual vision. Im running into that in my own research into the science of photogenics. At first I figured if the subject was emitting frequencies that were interfering with the digitial sensors, but then I remembered that the phenomena of negative photogenic indexes were observed even in the analog era. So my latest theory is that perceptual vision by the observer leads to a bias towards either a positive or negative photogenic index....either that or the subject (I used my self in these experiments.) Is just ugly.

originally posted by: AMPTAH

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: AMPTAH
What invisible entities?

Invisible entities are those beings that normal people can't usually see with their natural eyes.

However, many people can actually learn to see beyond the human vision range.

The way this skill is developed, according to various mystery schools, is by observing your own usually invisible aura.

To do this, you start in a dimly lit room, and put the tips of your fingers of your left hand to just touch the tips of your fingers on your right hand. Then, slowly pull the hands apart and concentrate on the space between the tips of your fingers. Keep looking directly in the center between the finger tips, don't follow the fingers themselves. You'll begin to see something within the space. With practice, you'll train your eyes to pick up the faint image of the aura near your finger tips. With lots of practice, some people can see entire auras of others walking down the street.

Once you have seen this "invisible" reality yourself, you will then begin understand your own question "What invisible entities?"

There's no art to the blind, nor music to the deaf, so they are entitled to say "What Painting?" and "What Sound?"

This is true. Mystery schools do teach this technique, and it works. That's how I learned to see some psychic phenomena. However, it has nothing to do with the article, which discusses telescopes that may or may not record unknown objects hovering above military bases. I think to evaluate the claims of the article it's better to defer to people who understand telescopes.

a reply to: AMPTAH

Now, the question of "am I seeing this because it's the only way my brain can process this sensory modality", that might be a valid concept.

I am slightly synesthetic and "hear" visual motion. But it's NOT true that things I see/hear are therefore emitting ultrasound.

Similarly, perhaps the brain can be taught to "see" a sensory input of some sort, but that doesn't mean the thing you're "seeing" is therefore "in the UV".

originally posted by: AMPTAH

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: AMPTAH
What invisible entities?

Invisible entities are those beings that normal people can't usually see with their natural eyes.

However, many people can actually learn to see beyond the human vision range.

The way this skill is developed, according to various mystery schools, is by observing your own usually invisible aura.

To do this, you start in a dimly lit room, and put the tips of your fingers of your left hand to just touch the tips of your fingers on your right hand. Then, slowly pull the hands apart and concentrate on the space between the tips of your fingers. Keep looking directly in the center between the finger tips, don't follow the fingers themselves. You'll begin to see something within the space. With practice, you'll train your eyes to pick up the faint image of the aura near your finger tips. With lots of practice, some people can see entire auras of others walking down the street.



There's no art to the blind, nor music to the deaf, so they are entitled to say "What Painting?" and "What Sound?"

Seriously?

I asked what invisible entities not what they are plus asked how in the world is anything you are posting is related to what this thread is about.

Once you have seen this "invisible" reality yourself, you will then begin understand your own question "What invisible entities?"

I understand perfectly well, you don't understand the simple question.

Which comes back to my other question asked in this thread, have you even read it and the replies?

I really wanted this story to be something when it first came out.
Now I'm starting to believe that Santilli in Italian means;

"One who alledges scientific evidence of aliens to the masses yet is ALWAYS
found wanting"

Beacause at this point between Invisible aliens cloaked in antimatter
buzzing Florida's sensitive military installations and
the 1947 Alien Autopsy film, the Santilli clan has the market cornered .

I don't have much of an opinion about the OP except for the too unreadable wall of text. soooo . . . a fix

originally posted by: Agnost
I just stumbled accross what seems to be a legitimate peer-reviewed journal article, that I think will be of interest to ATS. I can vividly picture some members saying: "I told you so!"

This is the PDF:
Apparent Detection via New Telescopes with Concave Lenses of Otherwise Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE)

From the abstract:

BEGIN QUOTE
we present for the first time evidence for the apparent existence of entities in our terrestrial environment that are solely visible via telescopes with concave lenses, while being invisible to our eyes and to conventional Galileo telescopes with convex lenses, which entities leave dark images in the background of digital cameras attached to the Santilli telescopes.
.
These entities are here called Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the first kind (ITE-1) or dark ITE.
.
We then present, also for the first time, evidence for the apparent existence in our terrestrial environment of additional entities that are also visible to telescopes with concave lenses while being invisible to our eyes and to conventional telescopes with convex lenses, which entities leave bright images in the background of digital cameras.
.
These additional entities are here called Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the second kind (ITE-2) or bright ITE.
.
It is pointed out that both types of entities generally move in the night sky over sensitive areas, and their behavior generally suggests unauthorized surveillance.
.
This paper has been motivated by the significance and diversification of the collected evidence, as well as available independent confirmations, that warrant systematic inspections of the sky over our sensitive civilian, industrial, and military installations via telescopes with concave lenses, so as to detect possible unauthorized surveillance.
END QUOTE
I don't really know what to think of it. For the moment I'll just post this for your digestion, meanwhile I'll look for how legit the author and the journal are. The author has a company: Thunder Energies.

Enjoy!!

originally posted by: InhaleExhale


Which comes back to my other question asked in this thread, have you even read it and the replies?

I have no idea what the camera lens saw, I wasn't there. My comments are about the existence of things to be seen, not whether it was seen on some occasion.

a reply to: Bedlam

Hi guys,

I think he might indeed have seen something, but that he is misinterpreting what he sees.

He is seeing these things "over our sensitive civilian, industrial, and military installations via telescopes with concave lenses".

These areas will probably have background light emision, which is de- or refracted by dust, gas and water particles, scattering this background light in all directions.

Seeing this through a concave lens, will make that that backgound light appears to come from one focal point.
(can't seem to upload an image at the moment, will try to do it in an edit, or next post)

Bedlam, as you are the light specialist, what do you think?

regards, Agnost