It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ancientthunder
Time is just a human concept a way of labeling, so what else could be of value in looking in to time? a reply to: Greggers
originally posted by: ancientthunder
a reply to: Greggers
Thanks for the reply and understand where your finger is pointing. but can that fabric not be stretched or shrunk? If so time is only a current way of measuring that fabric and I am not saying that its a bad system. Once we go in to relativity, which unlike you I do not know much about it. But what I would say, is that going by the word what is relative is only relative to what we know and hold as a fact. Its a bit like gravity, we just havent got it right yet. Me may be getting closer, but..... who knows.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Greggers
Time seems more than just a unit of measurement through. If humanity had never been around to attempt to quantify one moment from the next, time would still flow forward, entropy would still increase.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Greggers
Time flows, ebes along and moves at pace. Whether or not it does so in a liner fashion, or does so throughout our entire universe, that would be the real side note.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Greggers
Sounds like predestination through, and if that's the case then that's freewill out the window, which to be fair is also an illusion of sorts.
Somehow i imagine Humanity in its present form simple does not have the tools or understanding to describe whats really going on, not yet anyway.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Greggers
"unless we have some hidden method of utilizing free will beyond the space-time manifold"
Well we possibly share some form of group consciousness as a species but i cant see how or why that would be able to negate the factor of predestination. Possibly if our universe turns out to be of a holographic nature, which our current understanding of mathematics seems to suggest. Guess we will know for sure once we are able to measure the individual unit of Planck time.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Greggers
Sounds like we might all be Boltzmann brains in this block universe? Statistically speaking of course.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Asking if reality is real is like asking if falsity is false.
Really?
Is it?
Really. It is.
originally posted by: ancientthunder
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Asking if reality is real is like asking if falsity is false.
Really?
Is it?
Really. It is.
Is reality it?
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: ancientthunder
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Asking if reality is real is like asking if falsity is false.
Really?
Is it?
Really. It is.
Is reality it?
Explain reality; describe its function.
originally posted by: ancientthunder
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: ancientthunder
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Asking if reality is real is like asking if falsity is false.
Really?
Is it?
Really. It is.
Is reality it?
Explain reality; describe its function.
Is it really worth even trying, why not just let everything speak for it self.