#Guccifer2 and #Guccifer3 Trending on Twitter

a reply to: DJW001

Can i get a source please? You are the queen of one line responses asking for the same!

a reply to: onequestion

All can be found on Google if you know how.

OP your thread being vigorously linked to on twitter (Guccifer 2)
twitter.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Heh. Funny.

a reply to: onequestion


You deserve it!

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Don't be fooled. Reid only said that to appease us on the Left who were furious with them for not even passing a "Public Option". They also kept trying to sell us the "even Medicare started out small so be patient" crap, too, specifically to get us off their backs. They never had any intentions of pushing single payer and still don't.

YOIKS! Not going to be a good day for Crooked Hillary.

a reply to: IAMTAT

It doesn't matter it's the blind leading the blind in todays world.

a reply to: onequestion

Here's a good one at which to look:



Make note of the names of the contributing companies...

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

You know what bugs me more is the University of California.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: onequestion

Here's a good one at which to look:

Make note of the names of the contributing companies...

OOOOooo...Time Warner...AND Look at ALL the Bankie-Banks!

a reply to: DJW001

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

etc. etc.


Well, the original Guccifer did say that he had tons of information stored in the cloud.
Maybe he had a failsafe on it, so that under certain circumstances certain information would be released.
I think I recall him being in contact with WikiLeaks at some point.

ETA: Of course there was information that Russia also had access to the same information that Guccifer has, either from Hillary's server, or by hacking Guccifer's stash.

Or.. maybe it was the FBI:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This seems like a good way to fight back one.

Good op.

I just added this (and tied it to the #Guccifer2 hashtag) to the twitterverse:



Wonder if it will get any traction.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Could you please explain what that means? I'm a bit out of the loop lately.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

I will quote another post of mine from another thread to answer:

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yep, it goes back further than that with Hillary and the DNC:

Recall:

“I was not paying attention. For me, it was not like the Hillary Clinton server, it was like an email server she and others were using with political voting stuff," Guccifer said.

Fox News

When did Hillary officially announce her campaign for 2016?

launched her 2016 presidential bid on April 12 with a Tweet and a campaign video in which she cast herself as the champion of a middle class still struggling to emerge from recession.

NBC news

But, what if she was already organizing and planning while she was Secretary of State?

It was widely guessed that she would run again, but I am left wondering about the legalities of actively working on the aparatus of a presidential election whilst simultaneously holding a cabinet level position.

I really do not know and am hoping someone with more knowledge can share their thoughts on this.

Is there a point before which Hillary would have broken the law (not that she would let a detail like that stop her) had she actively worked on organizing her campaign?

The reason I ask the above question is because of an email sent congratulating her on her being appoint as SoS in which the following is also said:

BTW, would like your campaign staff for the 2016 election!
Gods speed and tight hug,
Prameela Bartholomeusz
DNC Platform Committee Member

April 29, 2016
Case No. F-2015-06322

From an email sent January 2009.

If she was actively working on her presidential campaign behind the scenes while also holdng the office of SoS, did she break any laws?

Guess who else is mentioned in that email?

(Lady Lynn Rothschild knows well and I am sorry say that I supported the McCain/Palin ticket the final weeks-I truly believed Sen McCain was more likely include you his cabinet).

I've brought this up a few times and no one has been able to answer this.

Is there a point in time before which it would have been illegal for Hillary to work on the apparatus of her presidential campaign?

Keeping in mind this is a letter congratulating her on becoming SecState, so this was while she was in that office.



Looking at the above referenced email, it would appear that the DNC and Hillary have been planning her presidential run from before she even took office as Secretary of State.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Hillary is endorsed by the Rothschilds !!!!

The irony is many Hillary supporters are aware of the Rothschilds and are against their banking habits.

A NEW CLINTON LIE!
[email protected]

The cache of emails released on Tuesday includes correspondence from 2009. But future email releases, according to the State Department, may include additional messages from that year.

The available emails show that, for about six months, Clinton received messages sent to the old account — but responded from “[email protected].” The last instance, in this release, of an email from the AT&T address was Sept. 20, 2009.The “[email protected]” account was shut off around that time.

Clinton, as aides said earlier this year, no longer has access to those messages.

Aides have maintained since spring that Clinton — now almost three months into her campaign for president — only used one account as secretary of state.

Merrill also said on Tuesday that Clinton only used the “[email protected]” as a senator. (The release on Tuesday also includes messages showing the address, “[email protected],” which is the same account, according to Merrill. AT&T and Cingular merged in the mid-2000s.)

www.buzzfeed.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

More Hillary lies exposed.

How many now?

about 500 lies ?

I thought campaigns were not allowed to ask for donations to Super PACs. Aren't they supposed to NOT be associated with them?

twitter.com...