It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ASIAHXPAORSBA
a reply to: chr0naut
The Ebionites and Nazarenes are 2 sides of the same coin.
Iranaeus of the Apostolic fathers lumps Ebionites in with other Gnostic sects.
Iranaeus Ebionites Gnostic heretics
This should end the debate and make you think that maybe you were arguing your beliefs, what you want to be true, and instead of searching for the truth you search for anyone who agrees with you.
Eusebius on the Nazarenes in the Panarion is the source of the Nazarenes being slandered to de Judaize Christianity. Again lumped in with Gnostics.
Panarion 29 Nazarenes
Ebionites
Though reading your comments I don't reckon Jesus himself could convince you that grass is green if you even accidentally said it was blue, it would probably remain blue to you just to avoid admitting you don't know what you are talking about.
But at least you are not going to be fooling anyone today.
Truthfully, how long before your current logon is also banned? What you are consistently doing is DISHONEST.
Also, the Ebionites and Nazarines were NOT 2 sides of the same coin.
The Nazarines were ultra-orthodox Jews who had taken an oath of dedication to God. The Nazirite oath had existed for thousands of years before the Ebionites existed. The Nazarenes did not know of Jesus for much of their history of thousands of years. They were dedicated, not to the Messiah, who had not come, but to YHWH. The Nazirite vow does NOT include a vow of poverty.
The Ebionites were a post-Christian Messianic Jewish group who held that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah but they rejected His divinity. They held that to follow Christ, people must obey the Jewish laws and traditions (however, In the book of Acts, the Christian church leaders; James, Peter and John, had determined that it was disingenuous that gentile Christians follow Jewish Laws and traditions). Theirs was an order of poverty (the title relates to "Ebionim" - 'the poor ones') and they took vows of poverty. Iranaeus, Origen and Epiphanius all said that these Ebionites were Gnostic.
Epiphanius of Salamis (not Eusubius) wrote "Panarion". In it he spoke of a sect originally called "Jessaeans" but who changed their name to the "Nazoreans". It is obvious that this group did not follow the Nazirite vow in belief, or in their actions, and were not Nazarene's in the sense that Jesus was called a Nazarene. It is this group that Epiphanius describes as Gnostic, not the true Nazarene's who take the Nazirite oath.
There are cults and sects around today who take upon themselves "religiousy" sounding names but who don't believe in the things that are in their very title, we all know that. They do it to deceive because their real 'source' is the father of lies.
originally posted by: ASIAHXPAORSBA
a reply to: chr0naut
You don't have any credentials. You have an agenda.
Enforce the image Christianity wants.
I didn't present anything of Eisenmen's, I just said he's qualified to translate, that he theorized about James and wrote a book and that you are only slamming him to bolster your argument.
Everything has been called into question about the Dead Sea Scrolls. Everyone used to think Essenes wrote them but that has been all but abandoned because it's clear from the Scrolls that they are not peaceful Essenes at all and never call themselves that or anything like it.
So it's a pointless thing to mention unless you want him discredited because he proves you don't know what you are talking about.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: coomba98
You will notice his two latest user accounts are now banned. I hope he gets the point and stays away. But that mey be wishful thinking.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: coomba98
Try looking over KingPhilipSix (which also happens to be the number of the current king of Spain).