The Violent Anti Trump "Protesters" Are Terrorists At Best...Hate Criminals In The Least

originally posted by: neo96
There is no constitutional protection for what Trump protestors have been doing.

To wit:

Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

www.law.cornell.edu...

Key word there?

PEACEABLY.

Sure, they are blatantly violating the law. As such, they should be arrested, processed and charged accordingly in my opinion. Not executed in the street.

I'm sorry, I understand your guys' frustration with this. The violence sickens me too. I just can't support the idea of mowing down people for throwing punches and burning flags. They completely ignore the rule of law so the solution for us is to do so as well and rob them of due process?

What crime has been committed that warrants execution in the streets? I'm sorry, maybe I'm a naive, bleeding heart romantic that thinks more bloodshed just takes us backwards.

But if animals wanna go at eachother like animals, they will. Just hope no one acts all high and mighty whIle they're executing people for non-capital crimes.

Why are they called "Anti-Trump" protestors, instead of "pro-Hillary" or "pro-Sanders" protestors who attack Trump supporters?

If Trump supporters went to a Sanders speech and beat up Sander's Supporters, you can bet your last dollar that they wouldn't be referred to as "Anti-Sanders" protestors! They'd be instantly classified by our incendiary media as " Trump supporters mugging Sanders supporters". Right?

a reply to: atomish

I'm sorry, I understand your guys' frustration with this. The violence sickens me too. I just can't support the idea of mowing down people for throwing punches and burning flags. They completely ignore the rule of law so the solution for us is to do so as well and rob them of due process?

Don't recall saying anything of the sort.

BUT.

The current administration has droned people for less.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
a reply to: KTemplar

I'm not sure Trump is the answer anymore. I am removing myself from touting him or supporting him in general. I do know however that Hillary and Bernie will bring MORE of this.

But I agree with the rest of your statement.

As much as I hate to say this.

Considering the last eight years between the police shootings,occupy wallstreet,ferguson, and BLM and the Trump protesting.

I could see martial law getting declared if Trump won.

Mainly because he would pretty much have to.

The seeds of violence have already been sown.

And there will be the left saying 'We told you so' when they have been the main agents provocateurs.

The problem in this country is basic math:

Supply and demand

There aren't enough jobs, which is why there are so many riots, it is more socio-economic then people realize.

Rents are being driven up - again, Supply and demand.

Jobs are being outsourced to other countries.

So this country should just give up and let it keep on course, and you see Shangra-la?

The drugs are so available now - kids are being offered Free Friday, and dealers are mixing heroin in with other drugs so they get hooked. Told to me by a DEA Agent.

You have to start somewhere! Staying status quo is not an option!

a reply to: Arizonaguy

I agree with you.

Having participated in field force training, along with a couple of lines during unlawful assemblies, I feel that San Jose PD received some kind of stand down order.

I mean the mayor of San Jose practically blamed Trump for the violence.

The mayor and city manager have quite a bit of control when it comes to their police departments.

I could be wrong, but...

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: atomish

I'm sorry, I understand your guys' frustration with this. The violence sickens me too. I just can't support the idea of mowing down people for throwing punches and burning flags. They completely ignore the rule of law so the solution for us is to do so as well and rob them of due process?

Don't recall saying anything of the sort.

BUT.

The current administration has droned people for less.

Sorry, I assumed you had because you responded to my response to UKTruth (who does advocate such), saying they had no constitutional protections when assembled in a non-peaceful manner. I took this as a tacit agreement to with the idea they should be executed in the street.

My apologies for attributing that stance to you unfairly.

Also for the record, I don't agree with the drone strikes either, generally speaking. But you are indeed correct.

Let's cut the crap.

If a group of trump supporters went to a Hillary or Bernie rally, and pelted people with eggs, attack cops, attacked elderly, attacked police horses, chased 15 year old kids like he was being lynched...while holding American Flags or the Gadsen Flag...

There would be pitchforks and torches in the streets and non stop media coverage.

I'm sick of this double standard charade. This is pure BS

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

That's because they want to blame Trump.

They are the victims of Trumps words. they are only striking out in pain and anguish because Trump wants to deport illegals.

He's mean.

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

A Simple Solution for Americans Citizens would be to Fight Fire with Fire . It's OUR COUNTRY , not Theirs.......

a reply to: TorqueyThePig

Very hard to disagree with that, amigo.

I found it shocking that somebody would be able to be chased down a block, across a street, and then back the other direction for half a block. All without seeing a single uniform.

Either the PD was completely and utterly unprepared for the event, or they were told to be unprepared for it.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

Yet no one trying to stop them from hurting Trump supporters. That is because by design they want to intimidate Trump followers but what they are really doing is forcing the4m to vote in mass for him.

While I agree with you that the word terrorism does get thrown around too much, this is the definition of terrorism:

The systematic use of terror, violence, and intimidation to achieve an end.

You please tell me where these protests, especially now that they have ramped up to actual physical violence against people attending Trump rallies, do not fit that definition. They are trying to keep from voting for Trump using these means. That is the end they hope to achieve.

This is no longer simply protest or speech.

However, I will add that anyone who has paid deep attention to the rhetoric has noticed that it was only a matter of time. Dialogue is not enough. Certain elements no longer want to convince. They simply want you to shut up if you don't agree with them and what they want. This is a natural outgrowth of that.

What these rioters and protestors are too dumb to realize is that they're solidifying Trumps supporters, and also generating new Trump supporters/voters. Everything done AGAINST Trump has had the OPPOSITE effect. This will be no different.

I hope that they will jump off a bridge, to help make the world a better place, after Donald Trump wins in November.

a reply to: carewemust



I realize it's a Bernie meme, but I think Venezuela is the proper place for the anti-Trump crowd no matter whom they support for president. Just read the top to say "If Trump is elected ..."

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

there is no such thing as hate crime only crime just saying

originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain

originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

No, theyre not "terrorists".

The "t" word is thrown around way too much.

Pretty sure Reid referred to the Bundy's as "terrorists".

The ones who committed acts of violence are criminals presumably guilty of assault and or battery.

According to the FBI, you're in error.

And according to feds you might be one. These guys are damn good at what they do. They have everyone hoodwinked. Right versus left. F@:$#!!ing priceless.

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
I think you just pointed out the frustration of the silent majority. I dont even like Trump but I am so sick of the double standards as well. Liberal media and millenial libs have taken this crazy train on a long ass ride and im ready to get off now. Its insane how many people defend this crap and pin it on one guy rather than the idiots who commit this violence.

Im sure not all libs defend it, but I have yet to meet one liberal who isnt.

If you go back to the Liberalist movement (my term) of the 1960's, which is the formative time for the many of the Democratic administration members; Holder, Clinton, Obama et al... you have to realize their own personal bars are set very low for moral conduct in a political arena.

They were in fact terrorists willing to commit b0 mbings, and MANY other extreme political acts. Is it a surprise that now, in their moment of glorious stupidity, they are willing to unleash, "by any means necessary" their self-righteous version of Liberal Fascism?

originally posted by: DOCHOLIDAZE1
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

there is no such thing as hate crime only crime just saying

Totally agree. I wonder if one of these fools was convicted of a hate crime, if liberals suddenly agreed also. Something to ponder...

The leftists have gone off the deep end trying to defend the increasing mobs of violence against anyone perceived to be a Trump supporter.

The argument now is it's ok because one time Trump said he's like to punch a protestor like the good old days? I mean, can these idiots separate a tongue and cheek statement from a legit, serious statement?

We've now reached a point that if you wear a Trump hat, if you wear a Trump shirt, if you even show up to a Trump event, you're risking personal safety, all because some violent clowns can't handle a difference of opinion? And none of this is happening because months ago Trump joked he'd like to punch a protestor. It's happening because these schmucks twist building a wall into racism, when it's about protecting our economy and safety of citizens and because these schmucks twist halting Muslims migration until we have a plan to deal with extremist elements as hating Muslims.

It's just foolishness all around.

I don't agree with Bernie or Hillary. Does that mean I have a green light to go sucker punch their followers? If someone likes MMA, a violent sport, do I have the green light to cold cock them? If someone likes violent rap music, do I have the green light to spit on them and get my friends to surround and taunt them in public?

What is this craziness. Trump supporters aren't stalking and attacking Bernie/Hillary supporters outside their events. The left condones these actions because a handful of Trump-protestors went inside Trump rallies and disturbed live events on private property and a few got roughed up due to it? These situations are nothing alike.