It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: usernameconspiracy
And that's where the "they are inter-dimensional beings who can't be picked up by infrared" junk gets added in, further discrediting the entire thought that they exist.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: Maverick7
I swear I'm not being a wise guy but did we really need any type of closure on this..don't think there are many on here who believed this to be true...but it is ATS
Why not?
I dont see any major big deal about a yet to be discovered primate class. its not like other primates are simply unheard of unicorns in the wild. Plenty of people have said they have eye witness accounts of these primates..sure..why not. its semi interesting, like hearing about a giant boar sub species.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
Im not convinced either way as to whether the PG film is real or fake.
To play devils advocate to his argument:
So basically this guys argument is as the horses and the videographer initially approach the bigfoot is standing relatively still for a whole two seconds. (Witnesses often say that the bigfoot will attempt to stand motionless to not draw attention or will stand motionless until the person gets too close and essentially flushes it out)
Looks like the bigfoot basically confirms its been spotted and then goes "ah crap the usual stand still trick didnt work" and then decides to egress. Sounds like a plausible explanation to describe its behaviour other than its an actor waiting for its cue.
35 frames for one step. Its standing still for 35 frames!!! You know what that means!?! The subject was standing still for two seconds. Thats it. Could have paused to see what the hell was walking up on it, maybe takes a second to go "oh crap humans, errrr what should I do....bail."
His argument is all baseless conjecture.
originally posted by: schuyler
Done by Blevin's Biblical Investigations, who has done extensive investigations of Noah's Ark, including timelines back to 4004 BC, the date God formed the Earth.
originally posted by: usernameconspiracy
The technology is just too good now to be stuck with Finding Bigfoot as "the search". If you take these films and videos at face value, these are not nocturnal creatures, and even in the expanse of the Northwest, a plane using specialized equipment should be able to pick up heat signatures somewhere regardless of time of day.
And that's where the "they are inter-dimensional beings who can't be picked up by infrared" junk gets added in, further discrediting the entire thought that they exist.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: BiffTannen
Its possible, being a supposed female in the video, she was purposely walking away from him in an obvious fashion to lead the videographer away from perhaps a family hiding in the tree line. A way as the alpha female of her pack to protect the rest of them.
Or, she just didn't feel threatened and didn't care and simply walked away.
"The upper half of the body, bears some resemblence to an ape, the lower half is typically human. It is almost impossible to conceive that such structural hybrids could exist in nature. One half of the animal must be artificial. In view of the walk, it can only be the upper half. Subsequently, I have seen and studied the film, frame by frame, a dozen times or more ... I was [also] puzzled by the extraordinary exaggeration of the walk: it seemed to me to be an overstatement of the normal pattern, a bad actor's interpretation of a classical human walking gait ... There is little doubt that the scientific evidence taken collectively points to a hoax of some kind. The creature shown in the film does not stand up well to functional analysis. There are too many inconsistencies ..."
"Great Mysteries-Mysterious Monsters 1975"