It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lavatrance
ball earth is the ultimate brainwash used to sell the theory of evolution.
Gravity is yet to be proven.
The Coriolanus effect is fake. Ask any sniper or tank gunner. There is no corrislis effect.
NASA is 100% cgi. They have no real video.
Virgin galactic was destroyed for good reason.
NASA is 100% cgi. They have no real video.
originally posted by: lavatrance
ball earth is the ultimate brainwash used to sell the theory of evolution.
Gravity is yet to be proven.
The Coriolanus effect is fake. Ask any sniper or tank gunner. There is no corrislis effect.
NASA is 100% cgi. They have no real video.
Virgin galactic was destroyed for good reason.
Jets do not reach escape velocity. Therefore they are still attracted by gravity. The gravity center is the center of the planet. With that in mind and the Bernoulli's Principle of how their wings work, they don't need to adjust for curvature, they cruise on air...with gravity...going around a planet...not in a vacuum without gravity.
originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: BIGPoJo
1. jets should have to but don't adjust for curvature
ever 3 seconds
Using that logic, I can get a high powered telescope and see the Eiffel Tower...but I can't. If this was a true feature, someone would of taken a picture via a telescope of something that is impossible with a curved Earth...don't see anything out there yet supporting this part of the flat Earth theory.
2. when ships over the horizon you can just keep zooming in a camera more and more to see it every time it goes over
CGI...? So those telescope pictures from a ground observatory that show crazy arse details in space objects are fake?
3. everything from space is cgi for sum reason
This one seems to change between flat earth theorists.. Either people state that everything in space is faked or CGI'd. In both of those instances, wouldn't it easy to put fake stars into pictures and other images? Or how about this, take a picture of someone with a very bright backlight. You can see who you are taking a picture of, but once you take a normal picture, the details of the subject is washed out. Images from space are the same - the bright Earth/moon, the Earth/moon that is reflecting light from the sun, washes out the very dim light of stars.
4. m.youtube.com...
5. mountains, canyons, sea level... Y would we b a perfect sphere.. also gravity is still a theory 4 sum reason..
6. We could easily replace einsteins theory of gravity with a theory of electro magnetics
7. What happens to water in zero gravity? which is what ur body is made of..
8. Antarctic treaty includes The Governments of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, the French Republic, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Union of South Africa, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the UniteThe Governments of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, the French Republic, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Union of South Africa, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States plus etc..
9. vids from in the iss are in earth orbit recording from very high up, through the circular window on the supposedly spacecraft which makes it appear like a perfect spheroid. not even that hard to pull off at all. might also explain why we can't see stars in space
10. The artic is the middle. Antarctica is the outside. Not top and bottom
originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: ChuckNasty
I never said the earth was flat.