It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Syrian refugee, Daham Al Hasan (47), who has fled to Denmark, has 3 wives and 20 children, and he expects the State to pay for them as he cannot work, according to himself. And it will cost Denmark a lot. Only in child support it is expected that he will get DKK 214,000 ($32,120) annually.
So far he has received approval to get one of his wives and 17 of his children to Denmark, after he arrived alone. 3 of his children are too old to get approved for (automatic) family reunification.
Daham Al Hasan says that he can not work or learn Danish at the moment because of psychological problems due to missing his children. Confronted by politician Naser Khader on Ekstra Bladet TV, he said he fled to Denmark and left his family in a war zone because he could not afford to care about them at the moment, but he had received information that he could get them to Denmark (or Sweden, which was the goal) after three months, if they managed to get to Turkey on their own, which obviously turns out to be true.
This case, and the amount of child support that Denmark has to pay, has made the Danish Parliament to rethink the amount of child support the State is willing to pay, and a suggestion for a maximum amount (for four children) is now on the table.
originally posted by: paraphi
Yes, a bit of a joke. Most immigrants received last year were men. All their families will be en route. It's a disaster for European culture. I mean, even polygamy is illegal, so how can he continue to have three wives? Why are such practices tolerated?
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: RomeByFire
I am from Denmark, the story is true...
If I were to live in Saudi Arabia (for example) it is illegal to own a bible..... so no bible or face incarceration BUT Is it OK for a man or woman to violate federal law and make the government recognize this polygyny as acceptable and legal? So the laws do not apply to everyone......
originally posted by: RomeByFire
I'm going to be "that guy," and say that OP's article - which is of course from the oh-so-not credible Alex Jones and Infowars - should be taken with buckets of salt.
I'm one of the very, very rare individuals who does not simply believe or accept anything/everything I see on the Internet as true, and for anyone else that has a similar style of credibility in journalism, they would surely do the same.
Sorry, OP, but Infowars and the infamous fear-monger Alex Jones should not be taken seriously.
and if that country rejects polygyny why pay for those other wives and children? Since when is polygyny allowed in Europe to anyone who has more than one wife?
"We're very happy for people to come to this country ... but we want people who are going to integrate and we want people who are going to respect our laws and our values, that's all we ask." West Australian Premier Colin Barnett said earlier this month he would not allow any State Government facility to be used for the party's launch. It was a repeat of the ban Mr Barnett implemented when Mr Wilders visited Australia in 2013. At the time Mr Wilders was booked to speak at a Perth hotel but the venue cancelled days before the speech. ALA national president Debbie Robinson said a five-star hotel had cancelled a booking for today's launch when it realised Mr Wilders would be involved. The Australian Hotels Association warned its members to carefully consider whether they wanted to allow bookings from Mr Wilders.