Casey Anthony's lawyer admits she killed daughter Caylee, investigator says

a reply to: gladtobehere

it is a news submission, so it has to be the exact same headline copied from source. This only applies to the news submissions though. Any other forum you can pretty much completely re-write the title as long as it accurately reflect what your posting about.

Well if she was banging the attorney because she could not pay, I wonder what other services she would offer this payment for?? I will have to inquire further...

It's possible that her daughter's death was an accident and that she used chloroform to make her daughter go to sleep while she went out and partied or whatever. That scenario did come up in the trial. And there were google searches for chloroform from her IP address, but then her mother claimed on the stand that she was the one who had searched for Chloroform while using Casey's computer.

But I still think she murdered her. I think she is the one who came up with the 'Chloroform your daughter' to sleep scenario to make it seem like it was an accident to her parents. Or perhaps Jose Baez gave her the idea?

I always had a gut feeling that she was guilty all the evidence pointed to her.it seemed obvious that she was sleeping with her lawyer they just looked too chummy on the news,and in court. when it was reported that she was staying at his beach house and he hired security to guard the house it was obvious that he was banging her.

Yeah, Casey Anthony was innocent like O.J., Jodie Arias, and Zimmerman. Yeah. There were on-going debates when that was going on. Whether this report is true or not, I always found it difficult to believe anyone actually thought she was innocent, and would have hated to be on the jury that set her loose. They have to live with that idiocy.

She's not free , never will be. But she was cut loose from the justice system. Big mistake. Baby killer. Infanticide. The worst of the worse.

a reply to: Bigburgh

No we all dont know she did it. No evidence was found to suggest she did. as such I suggest you think of it like this. The jury found her not guilty so i also leave it at that,and wish her well. Their decision trumps your feelings.

originally posted by: angeldoll
Yeah, Casey Anthony was innocent like O.J., Jodie Arias, and Zimmerman. Yeah. There were on-going debates when that was going on. Whether this report is true or not, I always found it difficult to believe anyone actually thought she was innocent, and would have hated to be on the jury that set her loose. They have to live with that idiocy.

She's not free , never will be. But she was cut loose from the justice system. Big mistake. Baby killer. Infanticide. The worst of the worse.

Zimmerman was justified though. Jury said so as well as the evidence. And no the jury dont have to feel idiocy. because the accusation of the PI is in question as credible due to previous statements and actions. You were not privy to all the evidence therefore you do not have the legal high ground to argue anything regarding its outcome.

a reply to: yuppa

No evidence was found to suggest she did.

Are you referring to the sex allegations or to the murder of her daughter? Because somebody chloroformed her daughter and she died as a result of it. If it wasn't Casey then who? The grassy knoll?

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: yuppa

No evidence was found to suggest she did.

Are you referring to the sex allegations or to the murder of her daughter? Because somebody chloroformed her daughter and she died as a result of it. If it wasn't Casey then who? The grassy knoll?

Nothing with her prints and or anyone being hired by her. Once again evidence or lack of it in this case clears her of the actions. The cops coudnt prove it,and the jury ruled not guilty. So it might had been the grassy knoll. Oh wait i know who i t was.. It was JARRETH the GOBLIN KING!!!

a reply to: yuppa

The evidence was actually pretty overwhelming at the trial. It was mostly circumstantial but it was a lot of damning, circumstantial evidence.

Baez got her off by portraying the Casey Anthony family as the family next door that deteriorated under the burdens of society's pressure. The media was fixated on trashing her parents for raising a killer, so Baez put the mom on the stand to show just how much of a trainwreck she was and she even came off as willing to lie to protect her daughter.

The jury saw it as (and rightfully so) a disturbing attempt by the media to put Casey Anthony on trial with the viewing audience before her criminal trial could ever even come to fruition.

I agree that the media had a hand in the outcome of the trial but I still think the jury royally f***ed up by not finding her even guilty of manslaughter. By the end of the trial the jury fell right for Baez' trap and ultimately just felt so sorry for the defendant and her family.

P.S. I love to hate Nancy Grace, too.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

if we had trials like in britain unless you have 100 percentile truth you arent found guilty. American courts rely too much on emotion. And circumstantial evidence is just stuff that happens to be and nothing acually factual. Its coulda shoulda woulda evidence.

a reply to: yuppa

Is finding chloroform searches on her IP and having chloroform stains in her trunk considered shoulda woulda coulda evidence?

I'm starting to think that you didn't watch the trial.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: yuppa

Is finding chloroform searches on her IP and having chloroform stains in her trunk considered shoulda woulda coulda evidence?

I'm starting to think that you didn't watch the trial.

She was found not guilty. I dont care what you feel. Law is absolute here.

a reply to: yuppa

Judging from your avatar and signature I can see you're a really big fan of obeying the LAW.

a reply to: ColdWisdom


I never thought she did it. Still don't.

If you look at photos of her and her daughter, they are very close and you can see the love between them. I DO think she was somehow irresponsible as a parent and ultimately "responsible" for her death. It was caused either by neglect, an accident, or by the hand of someone she entrusted with the child. She was a party-er and sadly, I think that was more important, and she was irresponsible with her baby's care.

a reply to: Loveaduck

Well that's why she got off. Because the jury felt sorry for her family.

But she should have been convicted of manslaughter at the very least.

That's my opinion.

Casey "got off" because the prosecution couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty of murder 1. That she got off is actually a good thing.

A lot of people forget that the American legal system is stacked in favor of the defendant. It is better for the guilty to occasionally go free than for the innocent to be easily condemned. In our system you are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Circumstantial evidence may suggest guilt but it does not prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. That's why so many people beat the system. It's designed to be beat.

It may seem unfair that a murderess walk. Wait until you are the one on trial, however. You'll be glad the deck is stacked in your favor. (Yes, I know that even with the deck stacked in the defendant's favor, many innocent people are still condemned.)

As to these new allegations, who knows? Who cares? Her life is over anyway. Last I saw, she was living with the lead attorney's family, not Baez but the older guy, and working as a housemaid.

Double jeopardy? While she can't be tried for breaking the same law twice, there are other things she could be charged with. If there are Federal laws that she broke, for example. Then again, she must be proven guilty. Hunches or gut feelings aren't enough.

a reply to: Bruce001

Despite the 'innocent until proven guilty' position that US courts take, it is usually the other way around for most, unfortunately.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

She never testified...

a reply to: raymundoko

Correct. She had a smart lawyer. He knew the better option would be to make Casey's mother testify.

Even if she got off clean and cannot be taken to trial again, we should have some sort of law that helps instead of prevents people being brought to justice for crime in which they can find hard evidence. A confession is not hard evidence, although in certain situations I believe it should be enough.