It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: scolai
Only one person on that list was an actual fascist and that's Hitler. There's some confusion over the use of the word I think because their definitions have so much overlap, particularly now. All fascist are authoritarians but not all authoritarians are fascist. The rest of them are more properly referred to a totalitarians.
Contrast the lives of Germans under Hitler and those in the Soviet Union under Stalin to see the differences.
originally posted by: scolai
originally posted by: onequestion
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing...
How is Facism right wing?
-Pol Pot
-Lenin
-Hitler
-Mao Tze Tung
-Kim Il Sung
-Ho Chi Minh
-Stalin
Name one of these famous Facists who were not Socialist or Communist. I'm sure right wing Facism exists, but historically speaking, it's been mostly the left wing that has exhibited Facist tendencies.
originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
Not that socialism. The other one.
You know. The other one. It's always the other one.
originally posted by: scolai
originally posted by: onequestion
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing...
How is Facism right wing?
-Pol Pot
-Lenin
-Hitler
-Mao Tze Tung
-Kim Il Sung
-Ho Chi Minh
-Stalin
Name one of these famous Facists who were not Socialist or Communist. I'm sure right wing Facism exists, but historically speaking, it's been mostly the left wing that has exhibited Facist tendencies.
Benito Mussolini own quote of fascism. “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
drumpf lowered the bar, and there are idiots in every party
I have been following US politics since 1980 and I can't ever remember violence being this common, and it all started with the hate speech and not so sublte fascism coming from drumpf in phase 1
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: scolai
Only one person on that list was an actual fascist and that's Hitler. There's some confusion over the use of the word I think because their definitions have so much overlap, particularly now. All fascist are authoritarians but not all authoritarians are fascist. The rest of them are more properly referred to a totalitarians.
Contrast the lives of Germans under Hitler and those in the Soviet Union under Stalin to see the differences.
The "Fasci" were under Mussolini.......
AKA "Fascio"
It's Italian.....
You should read more.....
It would help....
originally posted by: onequestion
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing, but I believe we are beginning to see the rise of authoritarianism from the left. I've noticed a recent surge of this phenomenon working its way into the MSM rapidly by mostly Bernie Sanders supporters.
Now let me make it clear that I believe it has nothing to do with Sanders himself, its a rogue element using Sanders in the same fashion that Daesh and other radicals use Islam to turn believers into radicals or to gain support from believers.
Observer
The modern social justice movement, or the new “political correctness,” vaulted into the spotlight last year. Student protests swept across campuses with demands often focused on purging thoughtcrime—leading to heated debates on whether this movement is a dangerous pseudo-progressive authoritarianism or a long-overdue effort to achieve justice for all.
Here we have one of the most important questions we need to be asking ourselves.
Is this authoritarian or prgoressive and cultural adaptation?
I totally understand wanting to end hate paradigms and addressing with REAL racism, sexism, and other forms of indiscriminate hate against any and all groups, HOWEVER I do not believe the way we are going about it is the right way. We should be creating and promoting cultural changes that are based on merit and not sex, race, religion, nationality or any of it!
Chris Ryan PHD Podcast
Here is an episode from the Chris Ryan Podcast where he interviews Reid Mihalko, a professor and self professed SJW. During this episode you'll hear Reid address all the scary ideology being promote by this movement. Subjects like, safe spaces, gender pronouns, white privileged, among others.
Regardless of my own thoughts on the above subjects what really makes me nervous is not the conversation around these topics (which can be good) but the action taken by many so called SJW's. You can see it on campus, on the forums, on Facebook and in social media.
What am I talking about?
Violence, verbal and physical violence being accepted from the social justice movements towards people who do not agree with their perspective and the acceptance of this violence. Either your a moron, an idiot, completely stupid, or worthy of physical attack if you disagree with anything being said by the purported leaders of this movement! Its insanity!
I realize the country is going through a lot and our minds are adjusting to information overload from the internet but I think we need to all step back and chill out a little bit and realize that we're entering into a new paradigm culturally and globally. That we really have no precedence for and how we handle it is going to determine the future for the entire human race.
The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.
-Pol Pot -Lenin -Hitler -Mao Tze Tung -Kim Il Sung -Ho Chi Minh -Stalin