Saudi Press Just Accused US Govt of Blowing Up World Trade Centers...

originally posted by: yuppa
Its in retaliation for allowing them to be sued. Its blatantly obvious.

Or...

It's the standard layered obfuscation the US gov has patented and uses as standard operating procedure.

First it was bin Laden.

Then when nobody believes that pile, oh suddenly it's the Saudis.

Never mind that the hijackers are still alive, which makes THAT explanation implausible.

See, there has to be a fallback position when BS is loudly called on the Official Story so they can admit they lied initially without actually divulging what really happened.

This might actually be closer to the real truth than than what we've been told so far.

a reply to: Terminal1

Which is the elephant in the room. Never has SA been been at all held accountable and we all know why, elitist ties. Every other ME nation is constantly demonized, drone striked, bombed, or invaded but not SA. Hell, Iran was sued by families over 9/11 in NY and won in FEDERAL court! Iran! We are pretty familiar with 9/11 but who here knows about the Iran connection?

they did...what is new?

Yeah with the saudi royals as accomplices!

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Terminal1
a reply to: In4ormant

Yes... I repeat. 15 of 19 were Saudi nationals and we weren't even suspicious.

They weren't even looked into. Unless you count the ones that egressed out of country while every other plane in the sky was immediately grounded.

That stinks no matter how you look at it.

Everything looks suspicious when 2 skyscrapers fall from the sky.

Don't you mean 3 modern day sky scrapers taken out by 2 planes.

The official story is as believable as a map that promises to lead you to treasure after you encounter a leprechaun, a unicorn, bigfoot, and the lochness monster sitting around a table discussing their talents of shifting through dimensions!

a reply to: Terminal1

5 of 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals

Do you have proof that there was any hijackers? Except some pictures the MSM put on TV? Why would you believe what a liar says? Don't assume I believe there weren't any..

I wonder how many of these politicians are still hooked on the official story and actually think Saudi Arabia is really to blame.

If the judge overseeing these cases is another of Bushes uncle's then it is pretty clear the outcome. If the judge is actually impartial then the result that will eventuate from the body of evidence of just who is responsible will give the media something to coverup.

Look on the bright side, we got to demolish those outdated towers, and then bomb a few countries back to the stone age

a reply to: Terminal1
Not to mention missing trillions and their potential records getting destroyed, Pakistani ISI's Mahmoud Ahmad meeting at the Pentagon a week before 9/11, Saudi officials being flown out immediately after the attacks, the 140 Israelis who were detained for managing "an organized intelligence gathering operation designed to penetrate government facilities" yet extradited to Israel by executive order...



It seems to me like a coalition of countries that all had something to gain put forth a concerted effort to harm the American people.

Very limited "security" footage from the airports, of any of the "other" hijackers on 911 except Atta. Maybe someone could clarify this...?

a reply to: FlyingFox

Yes, I can clarify, 9/11 was an inside job.

Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.

(CNN) -- FBI Director Robert Mueller has acknowledged that some of those behind last week's terror attacks may have stolen the identification of other people...

Its not as though Saudi Arabia is going to have the opportunity to defend itself in court, just as Iran did not:

US District Judge George Daniels reached the ruling in default because Iran did not contest the case, so no evidence was heard and no trial took place.

No real trial will be allowed to occur.

Can you imagine if SA could get Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to testify on their behalf?

The OS would immediately crumble.

originally posted by: Urantia1111

originally posted by: yuppa
Its in retaliation for allowing them to be sued. Its blatantly obvious.

Or...

It's the standard layered obfuscation the US gov has patented and uses as standard operating procedure.

First it was bin Laden.

Then when nobody believes that pile, oh suddenly it's the Saudis.

Never mind that the hijackers are still alive, which makes THAT explanation implausible.

See, there has to be a fallback position when BS is loudly called on the Official Story so they can admit they lied initially without actually divulging what really happened.

This might actually be closer to the real truth than than what we've been told so far.

posting something THREE DAMN TIMES is really stupid you know that right? Bin laden...Saudi wasnt he? Oh of course the saudis dis avowed him to cover their arses.

The hijackers died but their families were shipped back to saudi arabia by bush.