The Knight Templar & The Holy Grail

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: TerryDon79

And this makes a pretty good point why it can't be a hoax, or how would he have access to the old cisterciensier dating table, the easter table?

More speculation makes a point why it can't be a hoax?

So, your op is speculation backed up by speculation which is backed up by more speculation.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Why don't you answer my question?

And it is speculation based on artifacts. Which is how archeology works...

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: TerryDon79

Why don't you answer my question?

I don't need to. All you've offered is speculation. There's no evidence to dissect or rebutt.

a reply to: TerryDon79

If öhman hoaxed it how did he have access to the cisterciensier easter table?
Who built the newport tower and who planted oaks on oak island? They are not endemic there you know.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: TerryDon79

If öhman hoaxed it how did he have access to the cisterciensier easter table?
Who built the newport tower and who planted oaks on oak island? They are not endemic there you know.

You know that this was "discovered" in 1898? That's PLENTY of time to find out information and make a hoax.

The tower is easily explained as an old windmill. It even has the evidence of it being such.

What's so special about the table?

And trees? Really? There were trees of similar size nearby that were dated around 10-20 years before the stone was found.

a reply to: Peeple

your X is a Greek K (Chi) and the P is an R (Rho) as in the Chi Rho ligature used for Christ below:



Part true though, Rosicrucians used Greek mixed with Latin and English or German to transmit coded messages. You see it a lot in Shakespeare and with Bacon, seemingly odd typos or geometrical (dis-)placements hinting to certain things like star constellations and their parallell map references on Earth.

I strongly suggest you be careful when pursuing the holy grail. You might come across the Knights that say NI, and there are no more shrubbery s.

NI !! NI!!!

a reply to: GemmyMcGemJew

— What's you gonna do? Bleed on me?
— I'll bite you leg off!

a reply to: TerryDon79

I believe you're wrong. And I really don't need to convince you. The tower was no windmill. There are other indications, like inspiration point another rune tablet at the coast and so on.

We are talking about 1362 not 1898. Trees.


a reply to: Utnapisjtim

No it's not.

a reply to: Peeple

Yet it was sent to translators and found that the language used on the tablet wasn't the same as the language used pre-1500.

There are so many faults with the stone that it shouts hoax.

The trees roots it was "found entangled in" were dated around 1870-1880.

Deleted misplaced post

Second line

a reply to: TerryDon79

It's a phantastic story.
The writing could be off because someone just used it for the only reason that runes are easier to cut in stone than latin letters. Of course there would be mistakes.

The fact that someone planted the trees over the place where the tablet was hidden 1362 strongly suggests to me that it wasn't öhman. He hid it there 1880 to dig it up 18 years later? Nope.

a reply to: Utnapisjtim

What?

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: TerryDon79

It's a phantastic story.

Yeah. Quite literally.

The writing could be off because someone just used it for the only reason that runes are easier to cut in stone than latin letters. Of course there would be mistakes.

It has errors compared to other carved texts that are of the time. There's no getting away from that.

The fact that someone planted the trees over the place where the tablet was hidden 1362 strongly suggests to me that it wasn't öhman. He hid it there 1880 to dig it up 18 years later? Nope.

But you're basing your "he dug it up" on his word. Anyone can say they dug something up.

originally posted by: Peeple

a reply to: Utnapisjtim

What?

Yes, it's called linguistic science. And it has proven a zillion times that Pentecostal tongues is nonsense and is similar to what, articulate laughter og expressions of extatic madness.

ETA: Sorry wrong thread, my last few replies are for a different thread, sorry for the mixup

a reply to: TerryDon79

And the stone has acid traces from the tree roots on it, so it was definitely under earth under a tree.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: TerryDon79

And the stone has acid traces from the tree roots on it, so it was definitely under earth under a tree.

You know that that can be easily faked aswell.

I know you're trying to justify your claim, but it's only been verified as a fake. Sorry.

I am a bit confused, Christ was not wealthy, the disciples. We're not wealthy.
Israel was heavily taxed by Rome, what's this holy grail.

Do you really think it's a cup of gold with a giant ruby, diamonds and other bling or a clay cup like every other Jewish home had

This holy grail is fantasy, some made up relic like the shroud of Turin to suck people who need idols into worshiping

a reply to: TerryDon79

It's not fake. But I can live with it, if you and many others just don't want it to be true. Who knows maybe we live long enough for someone to find the treasure.
But then you and others will probably say that it's a hoax too...

a reply to: Raggedyman

Could also be the ark, hidden in New Jerusalem.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: TerryDon79

It's not fake.

It is.

But I can live with it, if you and many others just don't want it to be true.

Who wouldn't want it to be true? It would be amazing if it was true. Sadly, it's not.

Who knows maybe we live long enough for someone to find the treasure.

Or find the hiding place of unicorns?

But then you and others will probably say that it's a hoax too...

If it is found to be true and the treasure found, I will eat my hat. I only have one so I'd be a bit upset.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Agree to disagree.
Keep your hat ready. I want a video from you eating it, if it is found during our lifetimes.