posted on May, 23 2016 @ 07:04 AM
The videos are mostly pretty accurate. The statements are often very pro-JSF without telling the complete story. However, it's still much more
accurate than the average tripe you see by the like of Bill Sweetman or David Axe. If you look in the description there's a link to another website -
where most aspects have been discussed and expanded, by the author of the videos. There's also a transcript (yes I did get permission from mods to
link this):
www.reddit.com...
www.reddit.com...
www.reddit.com...
As one of the comments said: "Fantastic video. Although I wouldn't call the video "busting myths", but rather "holy # look what this can do."". Here's
another example from Denmarks analysis:
Mission effectiveness (the x-axis is different mission types):
Survivability (the x-axis is different mission types):
www.fmn.dk...
www.fmn.dk...
Boeing of course, has disputed the analysis, stating that the Super Hornet could actually last 9500 hours in the way Denmark uses (hence 38 Super
Hornets are no longer needed, only 28) and other things. In any case, my expectation is the F-35 will begin to be praised once it really enters
service and a greater level of maturity is reached (like the F-22).
edit on 23/5/16 by C0bzz because: (no reason given)