It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
explain how another planet would affect the navigation of birds and sea creatures.
originally posted by: relentlessm3
but refuse to take head to any of the 3,000 year old plus, ancient documents, that acknowledge the existence of not only an orbital body, but beings from somewhere other than here.
originally posted by: wastedown
there is NO proof Someone's Bones or the article is a hoax
and it is not from a hoax site.
. Instead, in an apparent compromise between moderate and extreme nationalist generals, as Hammond’s aircraft was approaching Spanish airspace, it was intercepted and warded off, by two SAF T Mk IX Spitfires[1]
Just because a mod put it there does not make it so.
For anyone to be so stuck on themselves to really believe they know for sure what tomorrow brings is folly once they are caught unprepared.
For I or anyone to claim know the capabilities of something as of yet discovered is just as far off as speculating on what "they,it, them" are capable of.
If a Culture is out there that is millions of years more advanced who is to say they haven't sent ahead a team that is using a tech that keeps us all in a super real dream state all hunky dory while out world is actually in shambles. Can anyone prove that isn't so? Can you prove they haven't developed a tech that has an effect on what we call Gravity? Can anyone prove this system is moving at a speed or frequency that no matter what we do we cannot detect it until they flip a switch?
I read above that climate change is real and widely scientifically accepted as fact while in the same sentence stating that there is no proof it is man made or natural. No proof that it isn't caused by an incoming object causing changes whitin our solar system either, why is it the only cause excluded entirely? If you don't know the cause you don't know the cause. You have to look at everything together in a big picture sometimes to get to the truth. You also have to stay fluid and ready to accept a result you were not expecting. You have to wake up knowing that even if you went to bed last night knowing everything, does not mean you know it all today. If you have made up your mind on a subject and refuse to accept that you might not know it all, nothing I ever say will change that. Until it is right in front of your face you won't believe. And, that is fine we each are allowed to express our ideas and information, ALL OF US.
Yes... I totally understand how the human body interprets its "environment" and that was exactly my point. Light hits a "sensor" and is converted into and electrical signal that is somehow( no one knows how) translated by a conglomeration of proteins, amino I acids, various other chemicals and minerals, into a format that our consciousness (no one has "proof" where it resides or even comes from) understands.
Who is wrong?
Who can really honestly prove it?
originally posted by: wastedown
I said I would follow through and I have. Not that I expect any apologies from you bunch.