It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WhiteWingedMonolith
originally posted by: Thetan
Societies considerations on nudity absolutely fascinate me. Why do so many countries consider public nudity to be taboo or immoral? Why is it that in the United States(or any other country) you will be arrested and thrown in jail for walking around the streets in the nude? Why is it that co-ed locker rooms are considered shocking to those of us who live in North America? In Germany(and other parts of Europe too) for instance there are co-ed saunas and it isn't a big deal, not to mention tribal societies. When, where, why and how did we come to the conclusion that the human body is something to hide and if you don't hide yours you need to be thrown behind bars like an animal? To me the consideration that co-ed or public nudity is unethical is completely arbitrary. I understand the use of close for practical reasons(such as cold weather.) Or for reasons such as displaying social status or "expressing yourself." It's merely the consideration that nudity is in some cases indecent or immoral that is odd to me. Thoughts?
Why?
Because males can't control an erection. Garments can hold them in place. It helps them deal with it. Women ovulate in addition to other natural internal cleansing methods to keep "the bed of life" functioning. Garments keep that in place. We also have food and drink exits that we sit on. Anyone over 40 knows those areas start to weaken with escaped flatulence that could very possibly have the tiniest of turds attached to it, all innocent yes, but unsanitary. Women still in their youth have weak bladders due to having carried a baby in their womb, and for both genders, middle aged on up, the urinary muscles that hold in pee weaken. Laughing too hard, coughing or even a sneeze could result in a dribble. In addition, just as people sloppily dress or groom their nails and hair, one can easily surmise wiping after elimination is sloppily done. This is unsanitary out in public or in a shared home. Or even alone. Garments help shield. Male and female private parts, at any age, are sensitive outside of sexuality and need to be protected. No one needs an ant crawling around their private areas while sitting on a public bench at a park. We also have no hair or the hair is very fine on our bodies. So our skin is very sensitive. Our bodies are not covered with fur like a bear. This is what garments act as. A protective fur of sorts. Women have breasts and most prefer to have them held in place with garments based on comfort, believe it or not, so they are not jiggling around. Smaller breasts in middle aged women experience the same. Men with man-boobs feel similarily. Same with thighs, buttocks and upper arms, any extra flesh attached to the bone feels loose, garments help bind for better movements. Being fat has little to do with it as middle agers on up deal with skin losing it's flexibility to hold regular body fat and muscle in. Now some like to lay around naked or not feel binded but they are an exception, not the rule. Environments are also too extreme temperature wise and bare feet, boobs and butts can't deal with them without garments. Lastly, people are superficial and judge mere clothing. You can imagine the bullying and mockery would be worse naked. That wouldn't be cool. It's not Rocket Science. It's logical to protect the body and meet sanitary standards.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Phage
Most men think about sex all the time anyway. So do women for that matter. Since its the prime directive, it smells of " Find out what they want and don't give it to them"
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: SeaWorthy
These days if the majority of people walked around naked, sex wouldn't be an issue anymore.
originally posted by: hudsonhawk69
a reply to: Thetan
Since you bring it up? Is Western cultures insistence on keeping the body covered really any different from Muslims demanding that THEIR women cover up???
originally posted by: Phage
Because naked people (women in particular) engender evil thoughts.
About sex and stuff. And that's bad. Can't be thinking about sex.
originally posted by: schuyler
So many words; so little nudity.
Here's why you shouldn't normally go nude in public: Someone will complain, call the cops, and you will be arrested. The aftermath will be complex and costly and ruin several days of your life, possibly your livelihood and reputation.
That's the only real reason to avoid nudity in public.
In Germany in the summer, many people will get nekkid in the public parks and sunbathe. No problems with guys getting over excited or ogling.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: schuyler
So many words; so little nudity.
Here's why you shouldn't normally go nude in public: Someone will complain, call the cops, and you will be arrested. The aftermath will be complex and costly and ruin several days of your life, possibly your livelihood and reputation.
That's the only real reason to avoid nudity in public.
Well again I must disagree, you have teens with VD you have kids who don't wipe their arses and they sit on the benches and the restaurant chairs, animals like dangly things, you have sand, grass and bugs, skin cancer.... need I go on?
originally posted by: Night Star
originally posted by: hudsonhawk69
a reply to: Thetan
Since you bring it up? Is Western cultures insistence on keeping the body covered really any different from Muslims demanding that THEIR women cover up???
OMG, yes, yes it is very different! You should know this.
originally posted by: Thetan
Societies considerations on nudity absolutely fascinate me. Why do so many countries consider public nudity to be taboo or immoral? ...?