It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: FamCore
Cows were made to give milk and to eat. Any cow that is just allowed to live freely is a burden on the land and useless.
Humans aren't supposed to drink other mammals' milk, so no, cows were not "made" to make us milk or provide us with meat, they are here to experience life just like you or me.
All of the Maasai’s needs for food are met by their cattle. They eat the meat, drink the milk and on occasion, drink the blood.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: FamCore
Cows were made to give milk and to eat. Any cow that is just allowed to live freely is a burden on the land and useless.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: FamCore
Cows were made to give milk and to eat. Any cow that is just allowed to live freely is a burden on the land and useless.
Yes.
They are said to contribute to global warming because they belch and fart.
But we should tolerate them doing that as pets?
Cows are stupid.
They will stand in the middle of a stream with their arse end pointed upstream, take a dump and piss.... while drinking the downstream water.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: ChesterJohn
What about starving kids in Africa? Because they aren't working in our manufacturing plants are they just a "burden" to natural resources on the planet and a waste of life as well? Should we not allow them to live either? I have to respectfully and wholeheartedly disagree
Humans aren't supposed to drink other mammals' milk, so no, cows were not "made" to make us milk or provide us with meat, they are here to experience life just like you or me.
What makes you think we as humans have the authority to deem which creatures are "allowed" to stay alive? It's the year 2016. Human nature can be barbaric but at this point we need to realize we are smart enough to be more responsible. This is long overdue if anything. There will always be atrocities taking place, but those who recognize opportunities to improve can make a difference
originally posted by: Sremmos80
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: FamCore
Cows were made to give milk and to eat. Any cow that is just allowed to live freely is a burden on the land and useless.
You confused made and domesticated, we didn't make the cow, we just decided at one point it was a good resource.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: ChesterJohn
What about starving kids in Africa?
All of the Maasai’s needs for food are met by their cattle
They may still have relationships with the animals and treat them with respect.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
does this mean we just slaughter the lot of them because we don't think they are allowed to be here anymore? Are humans doing great things for the environment? No, so should we just all kill ourselves then?
I'm having trouble understanding how we can justify factory farming and killing tons of animals just because we don't find them useful anymore. Is there no concern for other living things anymore? Is the world just full of psychopaths who aren't affected when they see other creatures being mutilated and killed for the sake of "saving space"?