It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyosaurus
I'll watch it I just hope it's not written by Dan brown.
originally posted by: Starcrossd
Thanks for posting the video links! I have watched the first one and will finish it when I have the time, It's very interesting!
originally posted by: Droogie
a reply to: Aazadan
If I'm not mistaken Frances Yates has argued that there's a lot of rosicrucian ideas found in Shakespeare's works. And this supports Petter Amundsen's findings, which points in the direction that Shakespeare was a rosicrucian project. It has been argued that rosicrucianism was a proto-masonic society. Altough there's no record of freemasonry in the 17th century, I believe there's a record of a certain person being inducted into the secret society in the 1640's. So something has obviously been going on within freemasonry 20 years after the first folio was released. That doesn't necessarily prove anything on this matter however.
I find it highly likely that Shakespeares works was a rosicrucian project. Jola Sigmond who's an expert in 17th century typesetting (not sure of the correct translation) and an accomplished cryptographer lends his support to Petter's findings.
originally posted by: Sillyosaurus
I'll watch it I just hope it's not written by Dan brown.
I can assure you it's not. Alas it can be interpreted to be in the same vein as Dan Brown, I would argue that this is infinitely more compelling though! Hope you won't be disappointed
a reply to: Restricted
The Oak Island theory can certainly seem like a stretch. But it is interesting how Petter recognized Fred Nolan's cross to be a part of the tree of life. The boulders found on the island corresponds with the sephirots of the tree of life. Maybe it's not conclusive, but it is compelling.
originally posted by: Starcrossd
Thanks for posting the video links! I have watched the first one and will finish it when I have the time, It's very interesting!
Thanks, Starcrossd! Glad you enjoyed it. It only gets better in the following episodes. I would also remark that a lot of the findings didn't make it into this documentary, which is unfortunate. There is alot of evidence compiled that sews a much more intricate picture than what is presented.
There will be an english speaking documentary soon I believe, featuring Shakespeare scholar Robert Crumpton, in which Petter Amundsen will present his findings to Robert. Sounds good to me!