It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlubberyConspiracy
Timed perfectly with the presidential primary and the news of massive disapproval of Clinton in California. With her support of the Honduras coup and assassination of democracy and environmental rights activist Berta Cáceres.
This NASA sublet is probably going to be lame news, mostly about the hype to block a critical news story to one of the biggest election thefts in US history. Stuff basically waiting in queue "in case distraction needed" or more nicely put "PR blocked until cap lifted" to give access to one of the two only media giants a nice front page story to divert.
The announcement is unlikely to have anything to do with alien life forms, but NASA doesn’t usually hold a press conference about its scientific findings unless it’s kind of a big deal.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
My prediction is that whatever scientific findings or data are announced, no matter how exciting the findings are among the scientific community, there will be people on this board saying "So what? Why did NASA bother having a press conference for this?"
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Dark Ghost
Any juicy speculations besides disclosure, alien structures, newly discovered habitual planet, new technology or something entirely unexpected?
What is a habitual planet?
You left out a planet killing asteroid being on the way.
originally posted by: ObjectZero
While being kept up to date on what NASA finds is nice. I do wish they would just post up the information and keep the announcement for much larger confirmed discoveries.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
Same as they always are
"We've found another planet that could be earth like in the goldilocks Zone"
- end of conference
No offense to the OP but every time they do this and someone makes a thread and this is pretty much all that is said by nasa
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: darkmaninperth
Given the enormous reach, of the Kepler telescope, the discovery could take practically any shape. The folks running it could have found an interesting planet, a solar system of particular interest, or any other cosmic object of significant import.
There is barely any point in speculating beyond a certain point. Yes, it will have to do with distant objects, but greater detail than that would be impossible to guess at. I will, however, await further data with interest. No matter how apparently mundane their announcements have been in the past, I am always fascinated to hear tell of the discoveries Kepler and other missions are making in the depths of space.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
Not that exoplanets are not interesting. But they arent really are they?
originally posted by: UnBreakable
a reply to: darkmaninperth
Will this big announcement by NASA be akin to other big announcements which basically just regurgitate things the community knew months in advance?
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: UnBreakable
a reply to: darkmaninperth
Will this big announcement by NASA be akin to other big announcements which basically just regurgitate things the community knew months in advance?
As mentioned, NASA didn't say "big announcement"; they only said "announcement".
It is everyone else who hypes these press conferences (which NASA holds regularly as a means for getting information about what they are doing to the press and the public); NASA itself hasn't hyped anything regarding this announcement.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
Not that exoplanets are not interesting. But they arent really are they?
Not yet. However, there might be a time soon that we will have the ability to analyze spectral data coming from an exoplanet in such detail that we may find a planet with -- say for example -- excess oxygen in its atmosphere. "Excess oxygen" would be something like the 20% of Earth's atmosphere that is oxygen, which is a percentage that we think can only be sustained through life processes.
The next round of telescopes being built and planned may have the ability to do such a detailed analysis of an exoplanet's spectrum. I personally find that interesting.