Pretty sure Bill Clinton's doodles prove Guccifer hacked into Hillary's server.

a reply to: Sillyolme


From your reliable source:

"according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter"


real reliable....


according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter, 100% of Hillerites will ignore this part about anonymous sources.

Thank you drive through.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Media Matters? Hmmm...that name is familiar.
Where have I heard that name recently?

Wasn't Hillary's new 'Troll Patrol' connected to David Brock...the founder of Media Matters?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Media Matters and CNN and the Washington post. I'm not an armature.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Thanks for agreeing I'm correct.
I'm no amateur, either.

a reply to: RickinVa

Don't even dude. You provided link after link with nothing but "sources close to the investigation" to support your side. If mine isn't valid then neither are any stories provided by Fox. Level playing field.
You just don't like what my sources say so of course they are invalid. Typical.

a reply to: Sillyolme

David Brock didn't found Media Matters and isn't associated with Hillary's Troll Army? They all aren't connected?
Tell me, if you believe they're not connected.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa

Don't even dude. You provided link after link with nothing but "sources close to the investigation" to support your side. If mine isn't valid then neither are any stories provided by Fox. Level playing field.
You just don't like what my sources say so of course they are invalid. Typical.

I can give you 3 links, all government, that prove without a doubt that Hillary Clinton has broken numerous laws concerning classified information.

All government sites.... straight from the horses mouth....

What do you have? Opinions from anonymous sources....

I will take multiple official government websites over random news sites any day... there is no bias n facts.. only that spin that humans put on them to make them fit their agenda.

a reply to: RickinVa

Not according to those doing the investigating.
You've shown me you can look stuff up and you've told me what you believe but apparently the FBI and the DOJ don't happen to agree with your findings. Tra la la, Tra la la.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa

Not according to those doing the investigating.
You've shown me you can look stuff up and you've told me what you believe but apparently the FBI and the DOJ don't happen to agree with your findings. Tra la la, Tra la la.

When are you going to post that link to the FBI or State Department website to back up your "Tra La La" claims.

For someone who claims to be in their 50's, you sure do type and act more like a 12 year old.

See you on indictment recommendation day!!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

What is your point? That you dont think my source is good? Opinions boy. We all have em.
What about the Washington post? Not good either I suppose.
Wow you are really hard to impress. Well I won't waste time trying . See ya.

Won't answer me?
Here it is again:

David Brock didn't found Media Matters and isn't associated with Hillary's Troll Army? They all aren't connected?
Tell me, if you believe they're not connected.

americannewsx.com...

www.cnn.com...

www.mediaite.com...


Of course I'm not going to find a conservative source for this. That's against their catechism.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Not familiar with Hillary's troll army. Sounds like another conspiracy theory to me.
If you say Mr Brock owns MM ok. This means ???????

a reply to: Sillyolme

This means you agree I was correct.
See how easy that was?
Carry on.

Media matters wasnt the source of the information. They are simply another site reporting it. If MM seems like an unreliable source.
It seems to me they provide plenty of links to their sources. Yes they are a liberal site. Ill admit that. That does not mean they don't report the truth. They debunk the lies too.
Notice Fox hasn't touched this?

a reply to: RickinVa

Like the way you spin this whole thing to fit the laws you think should apply and you don't see how that is less relevant than a news report? You're not getting it Rick. You're applying laws to rumors. Smoke.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Not familiar with Hillary's troll army. Sounds like another conspiracy theory to me.
If you say Mr Brock owns MM ok. This means ???????

See here:
ATS Thread: Trollgate

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Not familiar with Hillary's troll army. Sounds like another conspiracy theory to me.
If you say Mr Brock owns MM ok. This means ???????

See here:
ATS Thread: Trollgate

OOPS!
For someone "not familiar " with Hillary's Troll Army he/she posted in that thread multiple times.

a reply to: butcherguy

Come on now, you know what the first rule of troll club is, right?



Sillyolme, do you have any on-topic comments related to the OP (Pretty sure Bill Clinton's doodles prove Guccifer hacked into Hillary's server.), or are you going to to ignore the objective facts posted in the thread?

Here is some verifiable information for you to work with:

Guccifer retrieved these from a folder called "wjcdrawings".
The "wjc" William Jefferson Clinton naming prefix could also provide a hint.

...

wjcoffice.com also resolved to the IP address 24.187.234.187 in 2010.
In 2011 wjcoffice.com resolved to an unconfigured IIS 7 web server running on port 80.
There might have been an unlisted web directory, or it could have just been a service that Pagliano forgot to disable. No critical 0day directory traversal or remote execution exploits were public at that time for IIS 7, but it's possible private exploits might have been around.

...

[ 2010 ] - mail.clintonemail.com
[ 2010 ] - mail.presidentclinton.com
From September 8, 2009 until June 24, 2011, Bill Clinton’s Foundation-run mail.presidentclinton.com server had an IP address of 24.187.234.187, according to DNS records.
Hillary’s mail.clintonemail.com server had the same exact IP address, 24.187.234.187, from the dates May 21, 2010 until October 21, 2010, according to DNS records.

Source