US military planned 'sex bomb'.

Declassified documents reveal the Pentagon toyed with the idea of an aphrodisiac chemical weapon in 1994.

The gas would have made enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. The weapon's developers said homosexual behaviour among troops would deal a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale.

The plans, unearthed from a US air force laboratory in Ohio, were published in New Scientist magazine.

news.com.au
New Scientist

If the Pentagon weren't so powerful, this would almost be laughable.

Sanc'.

Nothing like going out with a smile on your face I love this can I have one if I ever commit suicide I was to die in bliss. HA I kill myself (with sex gas)



my wife wouldnt mind joining me on this trip either

[edit on 14/1/2005 by drbryankkruta]

[edit on 14/1/2005 by drbryankkruta]

Thats pretty funny. It would be great for riot controll too. Okay dust the hippies with the love bomb. But make sure you put on those gloves before you start making arrests

Well as funny as it may seem on the outside, to me, the issue is that of a democracy openly engaging in developing and using chemical weapons... If this is the case, they better allow all the communist and Islamic countries develop their own chemical weapons and not be complaining about it or using that as an excuse to attack them...
Whether the chemical being used is laughing gas, agent orange, anthrax, or some kind of slow-painful-death, flesh eating chemical is irrelevant, it is still chemical weapons development. The UN should send their weapons inspectors into the states to confirm or deny this report, and then take necessary actions and precautions to rectify the US's hypocrisy on this matter.

Ah, but this is a non leathal weapon hence not really all that subject to interntational treaties anymore than say teargas or something. Well not lethal unless on of the troops had soemthing infective.

Ah, but this is a non leathal weapon hence not really all that subject to interntational treaties anymore than say teargas or something. Well not lethal unless on of the troops had soemthing infective.

Maybe they should look into this aspect at the design stage. They could have it launched via a missile from an MLRS and when it detonates above the target, they could also disperse condoms as well.....Just a thought

Originally posted by IronDogg
Well as funny as it may seem on the outside, to me, the issue is that of a democracy openly engaging in developing and using chemical weapons... If this is the case, they better allow all the communist and Islamic countries develop their own chemical weapons and not be complaining about it or using that as an excuse to attack them...

but then they wouldnt have no fun they wouldnt have saddams to kick around and countries to occupy that makes to much since it wont work in the USA let every one do what they want cause the USA wants to do it, I think they like the do as I say not as I do policy more, never mind the fact saddam didnt even have the dang chem weapons in the first damn place.

granted he did at one time but now we look hypocritical and bullish even more so , chems are chems period doesnt matter if they cause immediate harm or sexual satisfaction the truth is they alter lives one way or another





[edit on 14/1/2005 by drbryankkruta]

[edit on 14/1/2005 by drbryankkruta]

Originally posted by IronDogg
If this is the case, they better allow all the communist and Islamic countries develop their own chemical weapons and not be complaining about it or using that as an excuse to attack them...

Why in the world would the US allow them to do that?

Whether the chemical being used is laughing gas, agent orange, anthrax, or some kind of slow-painful-death, flesh eating chemical is irrelevant,

Its absolutely relevant. Non lethal chemicals are allowed on the battlefield.

The UN should send their weapons inspectors into the states to confirm or deny this report

They couldn't even demonstrate that hussein didn't have WMD, what, have they become more competent all of a sudden?

Nygdan
Why in the world would the US allow them to do that?

For the same reason the US expects it from everyone else, or are you too special?

Nygdan
They couldn't even demonstrate that hussein didn't have WMD, what, have they become more competent all of a sudden?

They where saying it for months before the invasion. Its the US that has been unable to demonstrate they actually DID HAVE weapons...

...And did they have any idea how this sex-bomb was going to look like ? Like spraying female feromones mixed with cialis and poppers everywhere ?

Could you imagine releasing this in the sexually repressed Muslim world

How about a Republican Convention?

KKK Rally?

The list is endless

Oh man - what will they think of next?
Makes the soldiers irresistable to one another? Yeah I guess that would be pretty bad for morale.
Imagine a couple decades from now:
"Grandpop, what did you do during the war?"
"Well little Billy, I was lying on the battlefield with my battalion."
"Where you under fire Grandpa?"
"No, little Billy, we were not...."
"Were you just laying there Grandpa"
"No not exactly, little Billy.........."

I wonder if the weapon actually exists. Or if was just on the drawing board.

WME's : Weapons of Mass Erections


They just drop some ground up oysters and Viagra into an empty shell?

[edit on 14-1-2005 by skippytjc]

Haha

Imagine the Colonel going...

"Sgt.!! I wan to see my privates!!"



seriously, where's the science behind all this?
I suspect it was much more of a hallucinogenic thing...Having delusions that your fellow soldier was a nymph or something...

Its Just as well the bomb wasnt used because if the wind blew the wrong direction after use the weapon what ever cause the enemy soldiers to become irresistible to each other would end up over US lines.

Why don't they just bottle this up and sell it in all of the grocery and convenient stores across the USA. Use it to pay for the Iraq war and then some. I'm sure it would sell like wildfire here in Miami.

Someone should drop one of those on the White House while Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Pat Robertson are in the same room. Then film the results.

Originally posted by xpert11
Its Just as well the bomb wasnt used because if the wind blew the wrong direction after use the weapon what ever cause the enemy soldiers to become irresistible to each other would end up over US lines.

Yes and the US might even stop starting all these wars and flee to Canada to avoid being sent to combat stating they love there brother and wont fight, the whole military draft dodging what a sight.

Wow, quite an effective weapon, I'm just wondering if it encourages only homosexuality or if it encourages sex in general.

Interestingly enough the article mentions a chemicals that would attract numerous angry rats and or wasps. Now that would not be fun to be hit by. In fact I wouldn't want to be hit by any of these.