It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hubrisinxs
a reply to: Belcastro
The work done to compress the gasses in the star formation cloud create the energy that is the heat that causes a great rise in temperature.
originally posted by: misterhistory
Good old Wikipedia Wikipedia on star formation
The work done to compress the gasses in the star formation
liquid state there will be gas as it is on the outside and that is flammable
sure that as the clouds become larger and generate more gravity
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Bone75
Yeah I like this...we live in the Truman Show
The atoms binding together IS the ignition, it's called nuclear fusion.
originally posted by: Belcastro
If the atoms bind together does it make it easier or harder to ignite?
You do need high temperatures and pressures for nuclear fusion as far as we know (which is one reason we are skeptical about so-called "cold fusion"), but the friction of atoms during collapse of a gas cloud provides plenty of heat and gravity results in plenty of pressure for fusion to occur if the mass is large enough, and if the mass isn't large enough, you get something like Jupiter, where the mass is about ten times too low for fusion to occur.
originally posted by: Belcastro
I ask because i thought it was impossible to make ignition at that extreme of a cold.
does anyone know?
It can get complicated according to that but there are some admirable attempts in this thread to simplify the wiki explanation.
originally posted by: misterhistory
Good old Wikipedia Wikipedia on star formation
It's not, stars don't combust like a flame, they are powered by nuclear fusion.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
How is a gas flammable in the vacuum of space?
We understand the behavior of gravity on the scale of our solar system which is relevant to star formation, and that's enough to answer many questions about star formation. Newton wrote down equations describing the behavior of gravity centuries ago which are still essentially correct with a few exceptions which require relativity to explain like the precession of Mercury, and he also admitted he didn't know why it followed those equations, just that it did. Now we have more refined equations thanks to Einstein but I think we are still in the same situation Newton described, where we understand the behavior of gravity, but not the exact cause of the behavior.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
I didn't know that gravity was "generated" or if we even have any real solutions to what gravity is yet...correct me if I'm wrong
There are plenty of hot gas clouds, many of them hotter than the surface of the sun, however that thermal energy tends to prevent their collapse, so as the wiki article cited above explains, if they are too hot that will prevent the collapse:
originally posted by: dogstar23
For some reason, it's hard for me to keep in mind that the gasses are starting off so cold. I always tend to forget. My mind always wants to think of it as hot clouds of gasses.
"kinetic energy of the gas pressure" is of course related to temperature, and if it's really hot it can expand rather than contract.
An interstellar cloud of gas will remain in hydrostatic equilibrium as long as the kinetic energy of the gas pressure is in balance with the potential energy of the internal gravitational force.