"The Trump Family I know" by one of his employees...Lynne Patton

a reply to: reldra

The entire point of this thread is the example.

If it is, then it is an awful one. Don't fail yourself.

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: reldra

The entire point of this thread is the example.

If it is, then it is an awful one.

It is not awful to imagine that a Trump employee, who handles their social media, has created a video where she may not be truthful in order to raise his popularity with women and minorities.

a reply to: reldra

It is not awful to imagine that a Trump employee, who handles their social media, has created a video where she may not be truthful in order to raise his popularity with women and minorities.

It's not awful to imagine anything. Perhaps she was being truthful to raise his popularity with women and minorities. Do you grant that possibility?

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: introvert

Do you believe him?

Hillary says she did not break the law or pass-on secret info on her email system. Do you take her for her word?

I'm not sure what Hillary has to do with anything.

Yes I believe him, and have plenty of reason to.

It's an exercise in consistency.

You avoided directly answering the question because you know that it would expose your inconsistency and political bias.

Trump, just like Hillary, is a known liar. Why would you believe him and not Hillary as well?

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: reldra

It is not awful to imagine that a Trump employee, who handles their social media, has created a video where she may not be truthful in order to raise his popularity with women and minorities.

It's not awful to imagine anything. Perhaps she was being truthful to raise his popularity with women and minorities. Do you grant that possibility?

I have stated it has a low percent chance. So, I have already granted the possibility.

a reply to: introvert

You are still avoiding posting a racist comment.

a reply to: introvert

It's an exercise in consistency.

You avoided directly answering the question because you know that it would expose your inconsistency and political bias.

Trump, just like Hillary, is a known liar. Why would you believe him and not Hillary as well?

Or it's a way to avoid the topic altogether. I try to not confuse hyperbole with lying and deceit.

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: reldra

The entire point of this thread is the example.

If it is, then it is an awful one. Don't fail yourself.

The best example is China. He has said that he loves China, then bashes China for doing what China does.

An entire meme has been created around that.

a reply to: reldra

I have stated it has a low percent chance. So, I have already granted the possibility.

That is fair. And I grant yours. He is a master of branding after all.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: introvert

You are still avoiding posting a racist comment.

I already posted it and I am not going to run around in circles because you want to stick your fingers in your ears.

He called Mexicans rapists. Some people find that racist.

a reply to: introvert

The best example is China. He has said that he loves China, then bashes China for doing what China does.

He doesn't bash China. He has said they are winning. He has said they have better leaders. He has said they are smarter. So much for bashing China.

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: introvert

It's an exercise in consistency.

You avoided directly answering the question because you know that it would expose your inconsistency and political bias.

Trump, just like Hillary, is a known liar. Why would you believe him and not Hillary as well?

Or it's a way to avoid the topic altogether. I try to not confuse hyperbole with lying and deceit.

So you avoided it again.

Figures.

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: introvert

The best example is China. He has said that he loves China, then bashes China for doing what China does.

He doesn't bash China. He has said they are winning. He has said they have better leaders. He has said they are smarter. So much for bashing China.

Then explain things like this:

In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal Tuesday, Trump accused China of wantonly manipulating its currency and “robbing Americans of billions of dollars of capital and millions of jobs.” The Republican candidate pledged to designate China as a currency manipulator on his first day in office.

fortune.com...

a reply to: introvert

So you avoided it again.

Figures.

And you avoid the topic again. Figures. But we do not need to play this little game.

a reply to: matafuchs

The man who made a career out of being happy about firing people on television is a compassionate employer? You'll believe anything positive someone writes about Trump, won't you?

a reply to: introvert

Is it untrue?

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: introvert

So you avoided it again.

Figures.

And you avoid the topic again. Figures. But we do not need to play this little game.

True, we don't. My objective has already been achieved.

Thanks for playing.

the crazy racist was phase 1

isn't anyone paying attention ?

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: introvert

Is it untrue?

Irrelevant.

I have just proven Relda's assertion to be true. He bashed X while at the same time claiming to love them.

a reply to: TheTory

Well, if you wanna get picky sure you can say Mexican isn't a race but try making the same argument to a Jew. Trump was targeting a specific group, a very large group, of people. So to make things simpler I will replace racist remarks with prejudice remarks. Better?