It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Probably not a Horton, because neither Hortons nor any typical aircraft would fly the way Arnold described, "skipping" or dipping every few seconds:
originally posted by: UnderKingsPeak
Yeah I have been all over the place with this one.
Maury Island hoax? Fred Crisman, secret agents, communists,
secret churches, the Kennedy assassination .
I hope for all our sakes it was a Horton,
but the writing on the wall says something much more
secret and guarded.
Here's Arnold's report.
project1947.com...
www.history.com...
That seems to fit Arnold's description better and while I don't agree with all the conclusions of Air Force investigators, I think their explanation for this event is the most likely.
Regarding the June 1947 sighting over Mount Rainier, Air Force investigators deemed both Arnold and the prospector to be credible witnesses, but concluded that what they had seen was a mirage, not actual flying ships.
There was one other sighting 10 days later that Arnold felt was reliable, and it also sounds like a mirage because it "paced the plane" which is what mirages do, they pace the plane:
originally posted by: A51Watcher
Unfortunately we can't discount Arnold and the prospector's sighting so easily considering the hundreds of sightings that year with the same odd movements, which corroborate their sighting as factual and not mirage.
The primary corroborative sighting, however, occurred ten days later (July 4) when a United Airlines crew over Idaho en route to Seattle also spotted five to nine disk-like objects that paced their plane for 10 to 15 minutes before suddenly disappearing.[16] The next day in Seattle, Arnold met with the pilot, Cpt. Emil J. Smith, and copilot and compared sighting details. The main difference in shape was that the United crew thought the objects appeared rough on top. This was one of the few sightings that Arnold felt was reliable, most of the rest he thought were the public seeing other things and letting their imaginations run wild.
OK so it was no Horton based on that description, right?
"Arnold, in pointing to the possibility of these discs being from another world, said, regardless of their origin, they apparently were traveling to some reachable destination. Whoever controlled them, he said, obviously wasn’t trying to hurt anyone. …He said discs were making turns so abruptly in rounding peaks that it would have been impossible for human pilots inside to have survived the pressure.
That plane would have been much closer to the UFOs than Arnold but due to the way mirages work they would not necessarily see the same mirage as Arnold from their different perspective.
a pilot of a DC-4 some 10 to 15 miles (24 km) north of Arnold en route to Seattle reported seeing nothing unusual. (This was the same DC-4 seen by Arnold and which he used for size comparison.)
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
There was one other sighting 10 days later that Arnold felt was reliable, and it also sounds like a mirage because it "paced the plane" which is what mirages do, they pace the plane:
originally posted by: A51Watcher
Unfortunately we can't discount Arnold and the prospector's sighting so easily considering the hundreds of sightings that year with the same odd movements, which corroborate their sighting as factual and not mirage.
originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: A51Watcher
Because theodolites and radar are magically immune to mirages?
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: A51Watcher
THANK YOU! Your input in this thread is extremely important, A51. Most appreciated.
originally posted by: A51Watcher
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
There was one other sighting 10 days later that Arnold felt was reliable, and it also sounds like a mirage because it "paced the plane" which is what mirages do, they pace the plane:
originally posted by: A51Watcher
Unfortunately we can't discount Arnold and the prospector's sighting so easily considering the hundreds of sightings that year with the same odd movements, which corroborate their sighting as factual and not mirage.
That premise is based on one other sighting. My reply stands with hundreds of other sightings including theodolite and radar.
Mirage?
Does Captain Smith's UAL flight 105 sighting along with his crew, of 9 saucers fit mirage?
Check the links I provided and see how quick the mirage explanation evaporates.
eta:
Did you know that Arnold also considered reflections during his sighting, and slid back the window to eliminate that possibility?
Yah, he did.
originally posted by: moebius
originally posted by: A51Watcher
So you have got "hundreds" of sightings that prove what exactly? That human vision is not infallible?
How does sliding back the window prevent a mirage? Why would a mirage not consist of multiple images?
Can you provide any evidence that this sightings have been real objects?
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: A51Watcher
So after reading your posts, with a nod also to: charlyv regarding his question of distance/fuel for such an earthly craft - i.e. where did it fly out of and how does that make sense with fuel capacity, I would, in my own conclusion say:
No. Kenneth Arnold has not been debunked. In fact, I've learned a lot here that only corroborates the idea that he did see something that can still be classified as a UFO or UAP.
Thanks also to SLAYER69 for posing the question and starting the conversation.
This is a common misunderstanding that mirages don't fly around, but that is exactly what they can appear to do from the perspective of a pilot when the pilot reports that they "pace the plane", which by the way so do astronomical objects like Venus, though that wasn't involved in the Arnold case, but I hear the same thing about Venus, that it doesn't "fly around". When the pilot reports it's pacing the plane, that's exactly what it appears to do.
originally posted by: A51Watcher
Mirages flying around with ground and air witnesses and machines detecting and recording them for half the year reported by hundreds would be magic.
Most people don't seem to be familiar with mirages so I am not surprised when some people don't understand why that description sounds like a mirage, but that's what it sounds like to me and I've studied mirages, even made a thread about them.
Arnold’s own statements about his sighting help to bolster the case for just such mirages being responsible. He said the objects appeared to reflect sunlight and that they even seemed like “reflections” (as from his plane window, which he checked and ruled out). Indeed, “the flashing they made in the sun reminded me of the reflection of a great mirror,” he said, and they “looked like they were rocking” (Bequette 1947). The entire effect would have been enhanced by the position of the sun, its light reflecting off the upper surface of the mirages. He stated that, in addition the “saucer-like” objects were “flying very close to the mountain tops,” seemingly “swerved in and out of the high mountain peaks,” and, he came to conclude, were a formation “in the neighborhood of five miles long”—a large squadron indeed!
Your contention that everyone was seeing mirages is actually pretty humorous.
There are plenty of cases of friendly fire though. And I really don't understand how you can train someone to correctly identify something when they don't know what the thing they are identifying is. What training are you referring to and what studies have been done to show the effectiveness of such training?
Trained military observers were among those reporting sightings, whose observations being correct meant life or death for countless soldiers during the war.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
I really don't understand how you can train someone to correctly identify something when they don't know what the thing they are identifying is. What training are you referring to and what studies have been done to show the effectiveness of such training?
originally posted by: SLAYER69
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
I really don't understand how you can train someone to correctly identify something when they don't know what the thing they are identifying is. What training are you referring to and what studies have been done to show the effectiveness of such training?
If I may..
They are trained observers, They can identify many known aircraft. Obviously when they come into site of something they cannot identify its something worth investigating.
In other words, they are trained well enough to know what it isn't.
Wikipedia says the DC-4 was headed toward Seattle, and while I haven't tried to find independent confirmation of that it's a likely destination:
ETA: He says that the DC-4, the other plane in the sky was "far to my left and rear." He does not say which direction that plane is headed. Is there a record of that? Is it possible that they were not able to see what he saw, not because it was a mirage, but because they were going in a direction that did not give them good visibility of the sighting?
So I think based on that heading it would have been within the DC-4 pilots field of view. if you think 10 miles seems far, it's really not that far considering the series of objects described by Arnold would have stretched out over 5 miles.
a pilot of a DC-4 some 10 to 15 miles (24 km) north of Arnold en route to Seattle reported seeing nothing unusual. (This was the same DC-4 seen by Arnold and which he used for size comparison.)
Exactly, in fact some commercial pilot posted in my mirage thread that he had received absolutely zero training in identifying mirages. It just wasn't a subject that ever came up in his pilot training.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
I would imagine that pilots are trained to identify other aircraft. I'm not so sure that they would be any better than anyone else at not being fooled by something like a mirage.
(B) "It was during this search and while making a turn of 180 degrees over Mineral,
Washington, at approximately 9,200 ft altitude, that a tremendously bright flash lit up the
surfaces of my aircraft. " (Note that in his book, written about 4 years after the event, he
puts the initial flash during the turn toward the east, whereas in the letter to the Air Force
written several weeks afterward, see below, he indicates that he has completed the turn before
he saw the first flash.)
From Arnold's letter to the Airforce
(L) " I hadn't flown more than two or three minutes on my course when a bright flash of
light reflected on my airplane. It startled me as I thought I was too close to some other
aircraft."
LINK
COMMENT: Mt. Baker (altitude, 10,000 ft) is about 130 miles north of Mt. Rainier. Arnold
indicates that they appeared to be "in the vicinity" of Mt. Baker. However, it is more likely
that they were in the approximate direction of Mt. Baker, but much closer than Mt. Baker.
Even if the objects were not as far away as Mt. Baker the flashes must have been very bright to
be visible over a great distance. (If the path of the objects as estimated by Arnold, 170
degrees azimuth, is projected northward from Mt. Rainier, his sighting line to Mt. Baker crosses
the projected path about 50 miles from his plane, which is a more likely distance for his
initial observation of the flashes.) This suggests that the flashes were reflections of
sunlight from mirror-like (specular) surfaces, i.e., a polished metal surfaces. Sunlight
flashes could be visible over distances as great as a hundred miles under clear atmospheric
conditions. Anything less would be invisible over such a distance in the bright sky. Since the
sun was at an elevation of about 60 deg, some portion of the object's surface must have been
momentarily at an angle of about 60 deg. to the horizontal in order to cause a reflected sun ray
to travel nearly horizontally in the atmosphere from the object to Arnold's plane. Appendix 2
contains an analysis of the brightness of reflective objects seen under the daylight conditions
reported by Arnold.