Chauvet, Egypt, Da Vinci and Mars. Is there a link?

Several years ago, I stumbled upon something that changed a lot of things.

I've been left with a heck of a lot of new questions, many older ones answered, yet have gained an overview of how many of our theories about an ancient lost civilisation may very well be correct.

One of my biggest new questions is who, or what, were the peoples of this lost civ? Where did they come from? Where did they go? Why is there so little physical evidence of them being here?

Well according to many people, a lot of that evidence can be found in almost every ancient stone structure on the planet.
see this thread for example

I believe I have found some of that evidence in another source.

Art.. 35,000 year old art..

Problem with it though, is that it does not just point in one particular direction. The panels read like a book, but force you to re-read certain sections to see further underlying messages or confirmation of other sections. It then advances to a point where the artist is expecting you to have reached such a level of knowledge and understanding that you are able to carry on reading, so you are led out of the chamber onto the Earths surface and to certain locations. But it doesn't stop there. If you've advanced beyond that and are capable of flight, then you are given images of these locations that can only be seen from the air.

If that wasn't enough, there is a very strange formation on the surface of Mars, in the Cydonia region, that strongly matches to a piece of the original art.

Several of these pieces of art can be compared, very closely, to the ancient Egyptian, Sumerian and Roman cultures. So much so that certain images we have today can still be compared to this art and we can determine the source of this image.

We have a dilemma. Was this ancient civ of alien origin? Was it part human part alien? Or completely Human? Why is there no technology to be found? (money, drills, machines etc) Were they so far advanced that none of the things we know today existed back then that they used tools that we cannot even dream of.. This image is a mirrored section that appears to show a humanoid..


MUFON Australia took a keen interest in what I have to offer and allowed me to present a lot of my findings to them online. This was recorded and I'm now sharing that here. I've found this to be the easiest way to present as i am able to point things out rather than try to explain it in text.

What's striking is the vast amount of links and connections that can be made. Even Leonardo da Vinci appears to have had something to say on the matter as he has created several images in his art works that can also be compared to this 35,000 year old work.
This is a journey through the 35,000 year old cave art of Chauvet that appears to lead us out to Mars.. or is it from Mars to Earth, then into the cave to leave the record of a long lost past? Because of all this there seems to be an eternal loop of questions.
Where and when did it all start? What finished it and whose hands were capable enough to leave such an incredible message.


Because of the new questions I am left with, I have no answers. Because of the evidence that sits in front of my eyes, I cannot question. Because of the existence of this art, we have to broaden our minds and at least consider the possibility that this theory may very well be correct, or at least a majority of it.

I shall leave it in your capable hands and let you digest the sights to try to determine the truth of it all.
As for me, I have many reasons from many sources that tells me I'm right, but of the debunkers, all i hear are a few words. Pareidolia, matrixing or seeing what you want to see. They'll have to try harder than that to debunk everything.

Happy days

a reply to: Extralien

The "mirrored section" that "appears to be a humanoid" is a bit of a stretch.

And the video doesn't work. Use everything after the "=" sign in the video URL.

So what does the original look like? You can get alien faces from mirroring almost any artwork.

a reply to: Extralien

i think you believe to much if things that isnt real

a reply to: LadyTrick

sry for the OT, did you make that lovely avatar?

I'm sorry, what the hell are you smoking ?

Dang,I knew Bruce was looking old, but Batman is old as frack!
Id like to see the video if you can get it working. If you are in desktop mode click the little YouTube icon, then only put the letters and numbers at the end of the YouTube page link. Just get rid of all the "[youtube.com ]" parts and it should work fine. Looking forward to it, right up several of my alleys lol

a reply to: Extralien

This is a subject that hits home for me:

"Well according to many people, a lot of that evidence can be found in almost every ancient stone structure on the planet."

It doesn't end at every ancient stone structure but EVERY STONE. This is something that I know. Repetitive in-hand open-minded observation of many, many rocks is the key. Problem is, it's very rare a person to do this...its "crazy" and who wants to be THAT outside the bedroom?

originally posted by: Marduk
I'm sorry, what the hell are you smoking ?

More importantly, why aren't they sharing?

Seriously though, your best evidence is a mirrored image of part of a carving? What's the whole thing look like?

a reply to: Extralien

You cannot crop a specified segment of an artwork and add something that did not originally exist in it (the mirrored vector) and thence claim that it is proof of something. Considering that art is subjective to begin with, art cannot be proof of anything.

I am afraid you answered your own question when you mentioned "pareidolia".

a reply to: Extralien

My immediate reaction to the picture was Wow! they even had Batman. But before you think I am trolling, I am not because I concur with an ancient civilisation existing well before our lame ones came along and our claiming we built things like the ancient stone working is quite mad simply because if stone masons have existed generation after generation and their techniques may have altered slightly however their craft has never died out like the ancient stone masons appears to have.

The technological problem for today's debunkers is that huge stone "Stone of the South at a quarry just south of Baalbek in the quarry which had been carved on the top and sides only. No means for us to cut if off the bottom from the trench it lies in and certainly not to lift it without some very strong and specialised lifting capabilities.

The more we discuss and emphasise these anomalies the more likely we are to get scientists and archaeologists to speak out about them and maybe get to the truth - which we don't have in any way, shape or form at the moment about our beginnings.

a reply to: Extralien

My immediate reaction to the picture was Wow! they even had Batman. But before you think I am trolling, I am not because I concur with an ancient civilisation existing well before our lame ones came along and our claiming we built things like the ancient stone working is quite mad simply because if stone masons have existed generation after generation and their techniques may have altered slightly however their craft has never died out like the ancient stone masons appears to have.

The technological problem for today's debunkers is that huge stone "Stone of the South at a quarry just south of Baalbek in the quarry which had been carved on the top and sides only. No means for us to cut if off the bottom from the trench it lies in and certainly not to lift it without some very strong and specialised lifting capabilities.

The more we discuss and emphasise these anomalies the more likely we are to get scientists and archaeologists to speak out about them and maybe get to the truth - which we don't have in any way, shape or form at the moment about our beginnings.

Let's see if it works now.. Should do.. Thought I'd got it right the first time.. hey-ho..
If not, just in case,
vid is here

I love the way some try to put words in your mouth. I never said it was proof.. I have put forward "evidence" that "appears" to point towards something that "may" be far more advanced than anyone has given it credit for.

As requested, here is the original.

To give you a bit more of an idea as to the content of the video, here's a few examples.

Another mirrored img compared to a Roman relief in Austria


The eye of Ra from the cave art, to a formation on the surface of Earth near Tehran and from Cydonia, Mars


A section of the art compared to a section from the tomb ceiling of Seti the first


The mirrored face next to a mirrored img from one of Leonardo da Vinci's pieces.. They share more than twelve similarities.


Long horned rhino 'stacked' in exactly the same manner as we see from ancient Egyptian art.

How many times over must we debunk the same ancient rubbish?

a reply to: Astyanax

Every couple of months for as long as this site is online and we continue visit it unfortunately.

I let this thread sit here for five days before I worked up the nerve to read it.

What a letdown.

Put a mirror on my chin and you'll get an ellipsoid.

Harte