It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Talking Protestant peaches from history... Did a mutation remove thier ability of speech?
originally posted by: mOjOm
You guys must realize by now he'll never change his mind and will make whatever excuse required to keep believing, right???
No amount of logic, no matter how sound and irrefutable it may be will change that. Because logic isn't what got him in the position he's in although he spends a lot of time trying to make some reasonable argument for it.
But it's not reasonable. It is however very cleverly arranged and engineered so that once it gets a hold of someone's mind it's very difficult for it to escape. It has it's own security features so to speak. Like discouraging Reason and Logic and what is Real for what is Out Side Reality. It discourages Questioning the belief itself or even suggesting punishment for it.
He's the only one who can get himself out of it because it's been him who's got himself there and kept himself safe in that belief for a long time now.
I know this won't stop any of you. Hell, it doesn't stop me either usually. But there is a point when I think Time is truly wasted. Just saying...
originally posted by: edmc^2
To the contrary moJom - I've moved far beyond the elementary things you're struggling with.
The fact that a very simple phrase is so hard for you people to grasp gives me a chuckle.
True to his words Jesus he saw the wisdom when looking at children:
(Matthew 18:3, 4) and said: “Truly I say to you, unless you turn around and become as young children, you will by no means enter into the Kingdom of the heavens. 4 Therefore, whoever will humble himself like this young child is the one who is the greatest in the Kingdom of the heavens;
originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: edmc^2
Bulkocks. You don't even understand the phrase that you keep bringing up. You are full of sh!t and you damn well know it. Oh by the way I found this dandy scripture.
Psalm 104:5 "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved"
This verse clearly contradicts our knowledge of the earth but I don't expect you to address this. You will ignore it like you ignore all the scriptures I have presented that contradict science. You will say I don't understand a simple phrase as you have done with everyone in this thread.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: edmc^2
To the contrary moJom - I've moved far beyond the elementary things you're struggling with.
The fact that a very simple phrase is so hard for you people to grasp gives me a chuckle.
True to his words Jesus he saw the wisdom when looking at children:
(Matthew 18:3, 4) and said: “Truly I say to you, unless you turn around and become as young children, you will by no means enter into the Kingdom of the heavens. 4 Therefore, whoever will humble himself like this young child is the one who is the greatest in the Kingdom of the heavens;
I actually wasn't talking about you.
Nor am I struggling with anything. I'm also having no part in the conversation about that phrase. I don't find the phrase of the earth hanging on nothing to mean much at all. It's neither proof of anything scientific or anything else. I think both sides of that argument are reading way too much into it actually and there are much better examples to use than just that one phrase.
Also that quote about children isn't anything original either. All Religious Avatars say something to that effect. Because children see the world from a perspective of innocence and without a history of learned bias like adults. They also see it from a perspective of ignorance too so I'd say it's a wash.
Also the earth will not remain forever. All matter will be destroyed to due entropy.
The gospels of Matthew and Luke provide genealogies connecting King David to Jesus, which was necessary to qualify Jesus as the messiah according to Jewish scripture. But when the legend of Jesus’s virgin birth was introduced, it made the genealogies redundant because it rendered Jesus not directly related to David.
Problem #2: Matthew says Jacob is Joseph's father. Luke says Heli is
Joseph's father.)
(Problem #3: Matthew says David's son is Solomon. Luke says David's
son is Nathan. -- Matthew says Jesus is in the lineage of Solomon, but
Luke says Jesus is in the lineage ofNathan -- Both cannot be true. So at
least one of these 2 Gospels is false)
(Problem #4: Neither genealogy can be the genealogy of Jesus since it is
through Joseph. If Jesus had a virgin birth, then it follows that Joseph was
not the blood father of Jesus. Other verses say that the messiah must be
in the blood lineage of David -- see more verses further down on this page.
What is the sense of these genealogies if they are not Jesus'? One solution
would be to say that Joseph was really Jesus' biological father and Jesus did
not have a virgin birth. But, Jesus not having a virgin birth contradicts the first
Bible verses on this page)
(Problem #5: There is little agreement between Matthew and Luke in terms
of Jesus' genealogy)