It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?
You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Sargeras
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: frostjon361
a reply to: reldra
As I stated, I'm not supportive of the source. But the phrasing, the implications come across as just plain silly regardless of the "truth". Legal recognition of a person's biological gender doesn't seem to match up properly in my head. The biological parts you are born with are the defining factor on sexuality and gender. I realize my opinion is not a popular one with today's special snowflakes.
It doesn't need to match up properly in your head. Popularity is not the issue either. It is accepting what is the law.
It is not a law, that I have to treat a mentally ill man as a woman because he says so!!!
What next, we have to agree the crazy guy on the corner with a sign that reads " I am Jesus!! " is Jesus because he says so?
The fact is Bruce is a man, period!!!
This isn't somthing one gets to decide, just like you don't have wings because you think your are a bird, and can't breathe water because you say you are a fish!!
By your logic I am Barrack Hussein Obama because I say so....
Is it really so hard to see how stupid this train wreck of a thought process is?
She is legally a female.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?
You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?
You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?
You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.
Conservative policy corrected the liberal slave trade
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: frostjon361
Wow, is this ever dumb and certainly not worthy of being an ATS thread. DNA is DNA, Bruce or Caitlyn it matters not, he's male. You can't argue with nature.
Cheers - Dave
originally posted by: Sargeras
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?
You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.
Conservative policy corrected the liberal slave trade
Brought to you by the KKK starting Jim Crowe touting tolerant left!
originally posted by: BoxFulder
a reply to: reldra
OK I was trying to summarize, if you are biologically born a male you are a male case closed. Period. If you are born black or Asian that's who you are. You can't alter your DNA to make you a female. You cant mutilate your genitals it won't make you ovulate. Tell me where I'm wrong? You won't make it it in the world if you are so basically devoid of common sense and basic biology.
originally posted by: BoxFulder
a reply to: [post=20622854]Nyiah[/postno but they have x chromosomes and a vagina so they are you know female. Nice try. You have no argument. Sex is not determined in your mind its actually encoded in your DNA. I'm short if I go around telling people I'm tall will that make me tall?
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: frostjon361
The link won't load. But regardless, 1) OK! magazine is a tabloid 2) The rest of your ranting has nothing to do with the matter at hand.
Caitlyn jenner is a female, first name Caitlyn. It says so on her identification. It is legally recognized. Whether you prefer to recognize it or not, it is true.
The term "Democrat" in American politics extends back to the founding era when Thomas Jefferson and other anti-Federalists, or supporters of a small central government, began calling themselves Democratic-Republicans in 1798. Always disjointed by factions, in 1828 then-candidate Andrew Jackson unified and renamed the party the Democrats
And how do you think Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Adams, and Washng would react to Socialists, and Communists? Got a clue?
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: visitedbythem
classroom.synonym.com...
The term "Democrat" in American politics extends back to the founding era when Thomas Jefferson and other anti-Federalists, or supporters of a small central government, began calling themselves Democratic-Republicans in 1798. Always disjointed by factions, in 1828 then-candidate Andrew Jackson unified and renamed the party the Democrats
The democrats and dixiecrats of old were hardly left wing.
I know it is hard to swallow for some that the labels we use today aren't the same as they were back in the day.
But hey I am sure that won't stop you from saying it in the future.