It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was said that the sons of god slept with more than humans, maybe these creatures were the results of this, taken literally then unlikely but if they produced offspring through genetic mutation(like we are starting to do now ourselves) then could these hybrids not have existed?
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: nonspecific
t was said that the sons of god slept with more than humans, maybe these creatures were the results of this, taken literally then unlikely but if they produced offspring through genetic mutation(like we are starting to do now ourselves) then could these hybrids not have existed?
Even today we have people who consider themselves as above other people because of blood line inheritance
They are deluded
I doubt some lizard creature ever copulated with humans or was born of the sexual intercourse between some god and "mere mortals"
originally posted by: nonspecific
We know that this planet has had one of the animals rise above the others in terms of intellect and gained the ability to genetically alter lesser creatures, they are called humans.
Given that we know that it has definitely happened once is it not at least plausible to say that it may have happened before now given the vast amount of time there has been life on the planet?
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: nonspecific
It was said that the sons of god slept with more than humans, maybe these creatures were the results of this, taken literally then unlikely but if they produced offspring through genetic mutation(like we are starting to do now ourselves) then could these hybrids not have existed?
Yes in a highly advanced civilisation capable of such genetic conjuring lots of things are possible though not desirable.
Myths and Art do carry information ... but are not literal
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: nonspecific
So do you believe the Reptilian creatures such as the statues are or were real ?
Or are you interpreting ancient writings ...
the snake in the bible
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: nonspecific
the snake in the bible
The serpent was demonized in the bible story when it is was held in high esteem by those of another faith
To those others ... They did not believe that the serpent was a real creature ... Serpents don't talk the Human languague
The serpent represented certain values which are ascribed to Humans ... wily and wise as opposed to evil deceiver
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
There is absolutely no Archeological evidence that suggests the reptilians evolved here on earth , So the most logical theory would be that they evolved on another planet.
There's no archaeological (or any other) evidence that they even exist, so the most logical theory would be that they don't.
Where's the physical evidence promised in the thread title?
originally posted by: ancienthistorianThe Amorite king, Og, was described by Moses as the last "remnant of the giants" (Deut. 3:11).