It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BigBother: Where you are there you are and all is mind when on it... so hey bossing yourself around instead of trying to control others is a good start.
BigBother: Where you are there you are and all is mind when on it... so hey bossing yourself around instead of trying to control others is a good start.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
...
Can one believe the biological entity can create or be attached to a non biological component? Does that mean a spirit/soul has to be controlled by a god figure?
What is a spirit or soul? How does a ghost differ to inspirit/heaven?
I have seen ghosts, so I'm not here to argue if they are real or not. More a discussion, why can't someone who doesn't believe in God be of the belief that a energy entity can exist without it's biological host?
so where did it come from?
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
I don't know, but that doesn't mean I have to skip passed go and head straight to a god.
I'm ok with just saying "dunno"
there must have been something that affects the transformation of energy.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
maybe, but again, that may not be a god.
...
Double pulse
Truscott's team found that when the second laser pulse was not applied, the probability of the atom being detected in each of the momentum states was 0.5, regardless of the phase lag between the two. However, application of the second pulse produced a distinct sine-wave interference pattern. When the waves were perfectly in phase on arrival at the beamsplitter, they interfered constructively, always entering the state formed by adding them. When the waves were in antiphase, however, they interfered destructively and were always found in the state formed by subtracting them. This means that accepting our classical intuition about particles travelling well-defined paths would indeed force us into accepting backward causation. "I can't prove that isn't what occurs," says Truscott, "But 99.999% of physicists would say that the measurement – i.e. whether the beamsplitter is in or out – brings the observable into reality, and at that point the particle decides whether to be a wave or a particle."
Indeed, the results of both Truscott and Aspect's experiments shows that a particle's wave or particle nature is most likely undefined until a measurement is made. The other less likely option would be that of backward causation – that the particle somehow has information from the future – but this involves sending a message faster than light, which is forbidden by the rules of relativity.
...
What could be that intelligence that affects all electrons throughout the multiverse?
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
My dog thinks I am amazingly clever. maybe he thinks I am a god.
Light famously has two natures: it is wave-like, interfering in the same way that water ripples cross each other; it is also particle-like, carrying its energy in discrete bundles known as photons. If the experiment is sufficiently sensitive, the interference pattern appears grainy, where an individual photon appears on the screen, as you can see in the simulated projection pattern shown. In other words, single photons travel as though they are interfering with other photons, but is itself indivisible. Matter also has this dual character; interference of electrons and atoms has been observed experimentally. All of this is backed up by years of work.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
you want me to repeat it a fifth time?
If our souls made that decision, why don't most of us remember?