Trump/Soros Connection CONFIRMED.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: humanityrising

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: humanityrising
It's funny to me, the 'Is this all you got' automated response. This is literally putting Trump and Soros in the same room many times, going into business together.

And again, the investment was from Soros Fund Management, LLC, not some 'random' financial institution.

He's also been in the same room with Hillary many timea.
He recently had a meeting with the GOP elites.
He's probably had meetings at some time or another with every unsavory character out there in finance or politics.

What's your point?

'The company you keep', 'birds of a feather', etc.

I wonder how many times Jesus went into business with Satan. Cause that would totally be okay according to you guys, right?

If it's about the company one keeps then no one currently running is in the clear.

I share that sentiment.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: humanityrising

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: humanityrising

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: humanityrising
a reply to: Vector99

Ha, ya just realized I screwed the pooch on that last one.

I just don't understand how you guys think he hasn't spent decades making alliances with the people you think he's against.

Hmmm, you edited that link out. That kind of indicates clear bias and intent to smear. It went against your opinion so you removed it. Why? Why not let all sides be seen, not just the ones that suit you. I honestly don't think I've seen such an obvious case of bias in an OP ever before.

Well, duh. I misunderstood its intentions and it wasn't conducive to my OP. Did you 'catch' me?

Yes - you were caught trying to smear and with a typically sensational headline characteristic of smearing. That's why it was obvious. At least be a little more creative.

Wait, wait, I wasn't 'caught'. "That's just business. Everyone has to make a mistake in an OP once in awhile. This proves nothing." Sound familiar?

Mistake? Nah, doubt it... Think you are pretty clear on what you wanted to do.

So you are agreeing Trump is in bed with the elites then.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: humanityrising
It's funny to me, the 'Is this all you got' automated response. This is literally putting Trump and Soros in the same room many times, going into business together.

And again, the investment was from Soros Fund Management, LLC, not some 'random' financial institution.

Yup

1. It wasnt a campaign donation.

2. It was a legitimate domestic business venture.

3. Its very clear where the money went as it is translucent.

1. Hillary takes MANY MANY MILLIONS in "campaign donations"

2. Hillary doesnt use her multi-millions for legitimate business ventures.

3. It is not at all clear where the money goes as Hillary is not at all translucent.

Question for you; Do you see the difference here?

This thread is not about Hillary. We all know she's dirty. This thread is about how George Soros and Donald Trump do business together.

a reply to: humanityrising

You didnt answer the question.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Trump is a 5-letter word.

Soros is a 5-letter word.

Both have vowels AND consonants.

Coincidence?

I THINK NOT!

Vote Sanders, because he has 7 letters in HIS last name!

Got a source link from the Chicago Tribune about that one? Trump is a four letter word, if you know what I mean, imo.

Text

a reply to: humanityrising


When you list ALL the people who Trump has dealt with business-wise and personally, then a proper context is established.

Until then selecting one, stressing that particular one and only that one will receive the yawn it merits.


I'm just a truck driver and I've dealt with assholes my entire career. Should that somehow be different for Trump?


Go back to bed....

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: humanityrising

You didnt answer the question.

You're going Glenn Beck on me here. Ya, of course there's a difference. Hitler was a fascist. Stalin was a socialist. See the difference here?!

originally posted by: nwtrucker

Text

a reply to: humanityrising


When you list ALL the people who Trump has dealt with business-wise and personally, then a proper context is established.

Until then selecting one, stressing that particular one and only that one will receive the yawn it merits.


I'm just a truck driver and I've dealt with assholes my entire career. Should that somehow be different for Trump?


Go back to bed....

Pot. Kettle. Black.

originally posted by: humanityrising

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: humanityrising

You didnt answer the question.

You're going Glenn Beck on me here. Ya, of course there's a difference. Hitler was a fascist. Stalin was a socialist. See the difference here?!

Okay now explain the differences you said you seen in my example.

a reply to: humanityrising


An intelligent, articulate rebuttal....as I expected....

Every candidate has flaws no candidate has got it correct on every issue they speak about and every candidate has at least a few bones in the closet, but there will always be a few bedazzled followers that will try to convince others that their candidate is the exception. I see the same people on these boards trying to justify every aspect of their candidate day after day and isn't just Trump followers.


For those followers I say "WAKE UP AND LAY OFF THE KOOL-AID".

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: humanityrising

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: humanityrising

You didnt answer the question.

You're going Glenn Beck on me here. Ya, of course there's a difference. Hitler was a fascist. Stalin was a socialist. See the difference here?!

Okay now explain the differences you said you seen in my example.

Maybe start your own thread for that. I don't see how it's relevant. We know Hillary is bad. But compare her to El Chapo....

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: humanityrising


An intelligent, articulate rebuttal....as I expected....

Oh, sorry.

"Go to bed..."

Better?

Hilarious....and yet so sad that we degrade the snake-oil salesman by smearing Trump all over the salesman.
This is a movie right...and 9/11 was the prequel...hollywood would be lacking to write this screen play.

Cheer

originally posted by: Grimpachi


Every candidate has flaws no candidate has got it correct on every issue they speak about and every candidate has at least a few bones in the closet, but there will always be a few bedazzled followers that will try to convince others that their candidate is the exception. I see the same people on these boards trying to justify every aspect of their candidate day after day and isn't just Trump followers.


For those followers I say "WAKE UP AND LAY OFF THE KOOL-AID".

Truth. Thanks for the post. I have tried to make a similar point myself.

a reply to: humanityrising

This thread isnt about Hillary, she was used as an example of an established elite candidate as apposed to Trump of which whom is not.

If you werent expecting an intelligent debate then perhaps you shouldnt have started this thread.

Not all Trump supporters are unintelligent as you like to insinuate. Furthermore as you have made apparent there exists unintelligent people that are NOT voting for Trump.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: humanityrising

This thread isnt about Hillary, she was used as an example of an established elite candidate as apposed to Trump of which whom is not.

If you werent expecting an intelligent debate then perhaps you shouldnt have started this thread.

Not all Trump supporters are unintelligent as you like to insinuate. Furthermore as you have made apparent there exists unintelligent people that are NOT voting for Trump.

When did deflection and ad hominem become intelligent debate? All I've gotten from the Trump camp has been some form of patent dismissal and/or deflection from the startling fact that Trump and Soros do business together. I can't understand why this wouldn't be important to his supporters, who have the most to lose from this.

a reply to: humanityrising

There was no attempt at diflection. Trump himself was sighted as part of the example in my original post of which you are referring.

As I pointed out it was a legitimate domestic business venture. It WASNT some sort of shady "campaign donation". It WASNT some sort of shady "fee for a speach".

Yes the LOAN (mind you it was a loan) came from a shady evil man. But the money its self was used for legitimate business and all records of where the money was spent and how it was spent is available.

Everyone here agrees that Suros is evil and that Trump took a business loan from him that was paid back.........sooooo what's your point again?

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: humanityrising

There was no attempt at diflection. Trump himself was sighted as part of the example in my original post of which you are referring.

As I pointed out it was a legitimate domestic business venture. It WASNT some sort of shady "campaign donation". It WASNT some sort of shady "fee for a speach".

Yes the LOAN (mind you it was a loan) came from a shady evil man. But the money its self was used for legitimate business and all records of where the money was spent and how it was spent is available.

Everyone here agrees that Suros is evil and that Trump took a business loan from him that was paid back.........sooooo what's your point again?

Trump and Soros do business together. I'm not asserting anything else. They are connected. What's there to argue with about that?

a reply to: humanityrising

Yeah.


Do you see something wrong with Trump taking a LOAN from Soros and using it for legitimate business purposes?

You said they ARE connected. Mind pointing where they ARE connected? Because your OP asserts that they WERE connected 12 years ago (with a legitimate business venture I might add).