It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A young dad in Australia has been charged with murder after he confronted a burglar inside his home. Father Benjamin Batterham, 33, discovered convicted rapist Ricky Slater, 34, near his daughter's room inside their family home in Newcastle, New South Wales, at 3.30am.
With a 32-year-old friend, Batterham confronted Slater and the resulting skirmish sent Slater to hospital where he later died of his injuries, believed to include brain damage.
Batterham also suffered facial injuries and bite marks to his body and some reports say he had to be tested for HIV. Reports that Slater suffered a broken neck have been ruled out. After Slater was taken off life support Batterham handed himself in at a police station and was charged with murder.
originally posted by: reddragon2015
The law doesn't protect people, it protects criminal.
Newcastle police are investigating the incident. The case has divided opinion across Australia, with most appearing to support the actions of Batterham. Celebrity lawyer Winston Terracini has been appointed to defend the husband and father, who is being held at Cessnock Correctional Centre.
originally posted by: reddragon2015
Stuff like this makes me very angry. The law doesn't protect people, it protects criminal. Shouldn't be if you're committing a crime and enter's someone home, you forfeit you rights? I mean, if someone breaks into my home, and if I feel afraid for my life, and accidentally kill them, why should I have to pay for that? It is so #ing BS. Stuff like this happens all the time in the US.
Who is the law really protecting...
originally posted by: eNumbra
If they won't stop trying to kill you, it is.
originally posted by: Aedaeum
a reply to: Aazadan
So you're a shill for the establishment? Got it
originally posted by: Aazadan
If they won't stop trying to kill you, it is.
And you have proof that was the case?
Killing someone is not the minimum force required to subdue them.