It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
I am sure Chicago is a great place to earn some wealth but once you have some money and passive income I personally would rather be in Seattle or San Francisco (Seattle probably more for me) which is getting a high influx of millionairs.
Of course I am not an American so I am only basing that off of terms like "windy city" and well... the west coast. I am on the west coast and what some call the humble abode of Cascadia. Never going to leave, shotty economy or otherwise.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: xuenchen
Like making people pay for water that is poisoning their children, then lie? That good republican policy. Constructing 288 laws against women, that good republican policy?
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: jhn7537
It seems we have a few conflicting perspectives here.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Edumakated
But, you said democrats were responsible for the bad management and destruction of Chicago. I don't think millionaires are dumb enough to invest in property and a life that will be destroyed by democrat policies.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Vroomfondel
What have the "good people" of Chicago been doing? How do these criminals get into office except for apathetic voters. Just sucking everything good about the city then desert.