Could the Panama Papers bring us to a digital One World Bank/Currency??

So I been reading what I can find regarding the Panama Papers.

Honestly, I don't have a clue what is all going to come about because of this data dump leak.

However, I did have a thought come to mind, So hear me out.

So with the global financial markets teetering on the edge of oblivion, and Negative Interest Rates Practices being implemented in some places.

Could the Panama Papers be the ignition on the fuse for the people to demand a One World Currency, managed by a massive data-collecting behemoth to know where every penny of your hard earned digital currency is spent.

Additionally, we are seeing a call for the demise of physical money, which plays into the above scenario.

Imagine, a facility like the Utah NSA data store facility, but for global financial records, every item you've ever purchased being logged and recorded.

Could this lead to that sort of push? What is your thoughts, ATS?

-Cyg

I doubt it, the papers only confirm what most already knew. If you have lots of money you can move it around, obscure its origin and avoid taxes.
This has nothing to do with one world currency.

originally posted by: Cygnis
So I been reading what I can find regarding the Panama Papers.

Honestly, I don't have a clue what is all going to come about because of this data dump leak.

However, I did have a thought come to mind, So hear me out.

So with the global financial markets teetering on the edge of oblivion, and Negative Interest Rates Practices being implemented in some places.

Could the Panama Papers be the ignition on the fuse for the people to demand a One World Currency, managed by a massive data-collecting behemoth to know where every penny of your hard earned digital currency is spent.

Additionally, we are seeing a call for the demise of physical money, which plays into the above scenario.

Imagine, a facility like the Utah NSA data store facility, but for global financial records, every item you've ever purchased being logged and recorded.

Could this lead to that sort of push? What is your thoughts, ATS?

-Cyg

I don't think the Pannama leaks will lead to anything. The Australian 4 Corners program looked that main player and some Australian companies and how they avoid tax using tax havens. They finished by saying the release of these documents might shake the govt and the tax industry up but the big timers has always paid either little or no tax for the last 30 years I know of.

I reckon the more the NWO and these so called 'free trade agreement' get rolled out, a by product will be that the big people will become even more immune to tax and most other laws. We have banks that are too big to goal and soon we will see the emergence of "super citizens" who are too big to goal and too big to tax.

As I see it, in most countries the tax burden will be borne to the small time insignificant nobodies who will pay the nations tax bill but and get nothing in return.

Socialism for the too big to goal and capitalism for the useless eaters.

a reply to: Cygnis

I sure hope not.

We simply don't need more ways for THEM to control us. They already control our access to so many of life's basic necessities like passports, healthcare and communication. I don't want to live under the thumb of some global currency scam as well.

a reply to: Jubei42

Ah but see, if your money is tracked, and accounted for by one, overly bloated and scrutinized "agency" in ALL transactions from getting a gumball from one of those machines leaving the supermarket, to larger purchases like stocks, bonds, cars etc and everything in between.

There would be no where to hide, if the currency was global, and digital, and tracked.

a reply to: Azureblue

Yes, it's the effect of un-tracked, un-scrutinized "financial freedom".

All someone would have to do is point out:

"People did this to hide money, all we have to do is create a global currency, and an agency to administer and track the currency and then no one could hide it anywhere, etc.".

Something i could being offered by some "group", as a solution after people possibly, get outraged and demand changes.

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Cygnis

I sure hope not.

We simply don't need more ways for THEM to control us. They already control our access to so many of life's basic necessities like passports, healthcare and communication. I don't want to live under the thumb of some global currency scam as well.

Agreed very much, Metallicus.

Sadly, I see this being brought to the table by a socialist side, blaming "financial freedom" as the underlying problem, and this being the cause that "x group" could solve.

Crisis, reaction (coming), solution (my dreaded thought in the OP).

I feel ill.

a reply to: Cygnis

Those with the means are always going to be one step ahead because they have the means to do so. In that sense the game has been rigged from the get go. The others are in no position to demand anything.
And even if a scenario like you mention would come to pass, don't confuse 'keeping track of everything' with 'total transparency'.

People around the world are being taxed on their hardworking income and any dividends received on their investments. Yet these government and corporate leaders hide their income to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. The manipulation and corruption behind the scenes is starting to be exposed. The people of the world need to start waking up and realize we are being oppressed by our government representatives, bankers, the rich, and the corporate elite.

Nope. How would you even begin to implement a 'one world bank/currency'?

How would the Chinese and Americans and Russians and everybody else agree who regulates and controls it?

And how would you sell the idea to electorates who don't want to change the money in their pockets? It would be an instant election loser for any party that tried to implement it.


Plus the elites make way too much money out of just trading in currencies.


So no, I don't think there's any risk of global monetary union being piggy backed on this.

a reply to: Cygnis

I think you are actually right to some degree but this event is not the catalyst. This is the financial sectors version of Wiki leaks. We havnt see the financial sectors version of Snowden yet. It is an operation to gauge reaction. Theybwont dump the real truth until they see what cards everyone is holding. Then they will come back with a hand that cant be trumped.

Its like throwing a bunch of rocks at a mine field before they try to walk through.

I think too many countries leaders would be mighty suspicious of any one broaching the subject of a one world currency, Russia, China, Iran, Arabia, south America, to name some, I learned some time ago when the Brits went metric, (100 pennies to the English pound) the lost 140 pence per pound, a pencil at six old pence, became a pencil at six new pence, as the old pound was 240 pence to the pound, new pound, 100 pence. a loss of 140 old pence.
That's what would have have most people Leary of anything to do with a one world currency.

Politicians would absolutely hate this idea...how would they hide and launder their bribe monies??

a reply to: Jubei42

Even simpler, it would be those same powerbrokers who'd be making the laws for that agency in the first place. We'd need uncorrupted people in every facet of government before creating these agencies, otherwise the corrupt ones would still control them. And if that were the case, I'd expect them to target common people instead of targeting the wealthy. Kind of like the drug laws that virtually never go after stockbrokers, bankers, and celebrities, even though those demographics are notorious drug users.

originally posted by: RainbowPhoenix
Politicians would absolutely hate this idea...how would they hide and launder their bribe monies??

A simple "blind eye" would do the trick.

The foxes, essentially, would be guarding the hen house at that point.

originally posted by: Painterz
Nope. How would you even begin to implement a 'one world bank/currency'?

How would the Chinese and Americans and Russians and everybody else agree who regulates and controls it?

And how would you sell the idea to electorates who don't want to change the money in their pockets? It would be an instant election loser for any party that tried to implement it.


Plus the elites make way too much money out of just trading in currencies.


So no, I don't think there's any risk of global monetary union being piggy backed on this.

You have something like the UN, which both China and Russia, and Iran, etc participate in.

I mean, why not, for all intents and purposes.

You implement it, as the Panama Papers continues to build anger and frustration as more and more names, big names, are brought to light.

You sell it as a way to prevent such corruption, at least to the sheep.

I mean, the UN has already been toying with the idea..

UN one world currency

originally posted by: pikestaff
I think too many countries leaders would be mighty suspicious of any one broaching the subject of a one world currency, Russia, China, Iran, Arabia, south America, to name some, I learned some time ago when the Brits went metric, (100 pennies to the English pound) the lost 140 pence per pound, a pencil at six old pence, became a pencil at six new pence, as the old pound was 240 pence to the pound, new pound, 100 pence. a loss of 140 old pence.
That's what would have have most people Leary of anything to do with a one world currency.

Aye, but how many of the younger generations remember this?

How many actually paid attention, or even still care?

It would bring all currencies to one value, no more regional, or country currencies.

Purchasing power would be equal across the board (Boosting many 3rd world countries economies).

One "earth coin" would be equal to one "earth coin" anywhere you go..

Scary idea, especially since it would be digital, and tracked, and accounted for; at least if your a pleeb.

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: Jubei42

Even simpler, it would be those same powerbrokers who'd be making the laws for that agency in the first place. We'd need uncorrupted people in every facet of government before creating these agencies, otherwise the corrupt ones would still control them. And if that were the case, I'd expect them to target common people instead of targeting the wealthy. Kind of like the drug laws that virtually never go after stockbrokers, bankers, and celebrities, even though those demographics are notorious drug users.

Exactly!

1. Problem (big ugly nasty ENGINEERED problem)
2. Chaos, panick, outrage, protests, disgust. People DEMAND reform, a solution to prevent this from happening again!
3. Same people who ENGINEERED said problem in #1, offer Solution! (Bright shiny no way anyone could loose solution).
4. People DEMAND said ENGINEERED solution offered by from #3
5. Everyone gets screwed!

a reply to: Cygnis

Exactly. Forcing the snakes in charge to create new rules will change nothing. We have to get them out before we can make any meaningful progress or improvements.

a reply to: Cygnis

I've been wondering the same thing. If this is going to start fueling a call for a One World tax system no one can escape which would obviously feed into the end of national sovereignty and a New World, One World Order.

All of it feeding right in to the idea that you cannot buy or sell without the mark, of course, but a digital currency works right into that doesn't it? And we would need something to start feeding that fire ...