Egyptian hieroglyphics what is looked for?

a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

How does one understand what the ancients knew? Besides just making it up, I mean. Besides just assuming stuff?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

How does one understand what the ancients knew? Besides just making it up, I mean. Besides just assuming stuff?

Plato knew of the platonic solids?

He was Ancient.

Why wouldn't the Ancients before Plato know of platonic solids? And all I have posted in this thread?

Look at Ancient artefacts you will quickly notice patterns.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

Why wouldn't the Ancients before Plato know of platonic solids?

No reason. The Greeks were certainly aware of them before Plato talked about them. But except for the mathematical curiosity that there are only 5 such possible solids, what's the big deal?


The "making stuff up" part comes from inventing significance that isn't necessarily there.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

Why wouldn't the Ancients before Plato know of platonic solids?

No reason. The Greeks were certainly aware of them before Plato talked about them. But except for the mathematical curiosity that there are only 5 such possible solids, what's the big deal?


The "making stuff up" part comes from inventing significance that isn't necessarily there.

Are you implying I am making this up as I go along? That I haven't done the research?

That I do not keep finding the same patterns over and over? Because I do.

And so do many others.

a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

Are you implying I am making this up as I go along? That I haven't done the research?

You've posted some of your research.

I'm just curious as to why you can so easily reject what those who can actually read the hieroglyphs say, and so easily accept the claims of people who who base their notions on...who knows what?

Platonic solids are cool. Conic sections are awesome too. These are things that humans noticed a long time ago. Because they used them in their art does not mean that there is anything particularly powerful about them, other than perhaps as being aesthetically pleasing and intellectually interesting. Sure, some people put a lot of stock in magic and superstition. Some people thought that there was something particularly special about those shapes. Plato thought that the universe was made of those objects named after him. He also thought the Sun moves around the Earth.

That I do not keep finding the same patterns over and over? Because I do.

Yeah. Well, if you look hard enough you can find just about anything. People are good at finding patterns. Also good at thinking they have found something significant when all they have really done is performed an interesting experiment in the psychology of perception (or apophenia, perhaps).

a reply to: Phage


What do I need to do to convince you Phage?

I am not implying I can decipher all Egyptian hieroglyphics. But I can some. As I do have an understanding of what the Ancients knew.

Or at least some of it.

The truth is I have only just recently realised what some Egyptian hieroglyphics mean. I have started to look at them with the knowledge I have posted in this thread.

And it all fits. Of course it will fit, it stands to reason the Ancient Egyptians knew such knowledge.

Great thread thanks.

I've really missed these kinds of post.

Please ignore the other posters.

originally posted by: onequestion
Great thread thanks.

I've really missed these kinds of post.

Please ignore the other posters.

Thank you for you interest. And encouragement.

Appreciated.

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
So...much...new age...bullcrap...

Not a single thing attributed to the ancient Egyptians here holds any water. Try spending less time watching ignorant nutjobs on YouTube, and more time reading basic Egyptology books.

Does one not see:

The snail without a shell (sacred geometry). The doughnut (torus) . The fire. The Golden ratio. The Flower of Life petal?

Interesting.


The musical instruments represent: The frequency, the vibration, the energy needed to create matter. To create universe.


It is all there.

I was telling someone today... I think gravity itself is sound, a waveform.

a reply to: onequestion

Here is something you may find interesting.


Cymatics found at Rosslyn chapel. (The Da Vinci code. The Knights Templar).

www.therosslynmotet.com...

a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

Oh I've seen the cymatics inscriptions on pyramid structures around the world.

These are relics of an even older past, pre dynastic Egypt.

In theory the Nubians and other modern Egyptian cultures were more inheritors of the pyramids rather Han builders.

It's to bad that we couldn't see what was actually inscribed on the capstones before they were removed by Sultan Hassan huh?

What amazing knowledge we lost to that guy.

a reply to: onequestion

I believe it is the very reason so many of our Ancient structures etc. are still being destroyed to this very day. ISIS in Syria for example.


The knowledge is not wanted by some, to been known by all.

a reply to: onequestion

It has been suggested that the sun symbol in this image of a Sumerian Tablet is in fact Cymatics.

I agree, it could well be.

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish
a reply to: Phage

Far from it. It is much better to use ones brain and understand what the Ancients knew. Then apply.

It's certainly much easier than studying.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish
a reply to: Phage

Far from it. It is much better to use ones brain and understand what the Ancients knew. Then apply.

It's certainly much easier than studying.

Harte

Are you implying I haven't studied? or researched?

a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

There are many many more examples.

Listen to Robert Shoch and Randall Carlson and a lot of these guys they are onto something.

Don't trust anything that's mainstream.

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: ProfessorPatternfish
a reply to: Phage

Far from it. It is much better to use ones brain and understand what the Ancients knew. Then apply.

It's certainly much easier than studying.

Harte

Are you implying I haven't studied? or researched?

He's telling you to take someone else's word for it rather than intelligently draw your own conclusion.

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

There are many many more examples.

Listen to Robert Shoch and Randall Carlson and a lot of these guys they are onto something.

Don't trust anything that's mainstream.

I do not trust anything mainstream. Not after 9/11.

Thank you for the two names. I am looking them up now.

a reply to: ProfessorPatternfish

Brien forester, Watch magical Egypt

a reply to: onequestion

I gave up taking other peoples word for it a very long time ago. It never seems to add up to the truth.