It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
Ok you made a claim that said if material is questionable as far as being classified then it should be considered classified didn't you? I found a reference to an Executive order which states
If there is significant doubt it should not be.
prospect.org...
And from the government itself.
www.whitehouse.gov...
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
Did you read the links I provided?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
Unlike me?????
I've read pages and pages including the one you link believe it or not. My bookmark folder has dozens of articles, pdfs files,and government links.
Why do you do that? You claim such finely tuned deductive reasoning yet you wrongly conclude I don't read! I just attach article after article you think I have not read. Or you're simply mean spirited which I've gotten indications of a few times already.
I assure you I read. Hours and hours each day and sometimes into the night.
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
Unlike me?????
I've read pages and pages including the one you link believe it or not. My bookmark folder has dozens of articles, pdfs files,and government links.
Why do you do that? You claim such finely tuned deductive reasoning yet you wrongly conclude I don't read! I just attach article after article you think I have not read. Or you're simply mean spirited which I've gotten indications of a few times already.
I assure you I read. Hours and hours each day and sometimes into the night.
I can read your posts and tell you don't read any thing about classified information and how it is properly stored and handled... that is blatantly obvious by comments like... Hillary was allowed to have classified emails on her unclassified server because she was a government worker... yada yada yada.
You might very well read a 100 Hillary articles a day... all I am saying is that it is a waste of time because you severely lack reading comprehension.
Start your Hillary is innocent thread... you won't see me post in it.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
Retroactively classified you mean. God.. pick and choose what's real and what's not.
And retroactive means she's fine.
Remember where I showed you if there is doubt the information should not be classified?
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: UnBreakable
I still have faith that Comey will do the right thing and recommend indictments for those that broke the law concerning mishandling of classified information.
There is nothing Obama can do to him, he is in until his term ends.
The thing is, if you strip away everything.... forget the FBI, forget Hillary Clinton...
Any government official who got caught with 2000+ instances of classified information on a private unclassified server would be in some seriously deep doo doo. I expect no less of the same for Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
What and leave you with your "we hate Hillary" circle jerk? You're not keeping me out of discussions. Look at you... thinking you are somehow controlling me.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
So now I know you're not even looking at the links I provide so I can feel free to ignore yours too.
This is a breakdown of the laws and how they would apply. It is not a left wing blog it's an objective analysis of those laws.
prospect.org...
It's a very long essay.